speculative photography an attempt (essay) of making visible (manifesto)

Main Article Content

Florian Cramer

This essay and manifesto define speculative photography from a historical perspective and through practical poetics, as photography that integrates fantastic and experimental elements in both its subjects and processes. Such photography is even more urgent at a time when generative artificial intelligence (AI) and computational photography are driving photography to an impasse of fabricated yet all-pervasive realism. The text defines speculative photography in its semiotic and information-theory aspects, outlines a taxonomy of speculative qualities in photography alongside examples of photographers and photographic communities practicing them, and pays particular attention to contemporary subcultures of early-2000s digital camera (digicam) reuse and internet pop-cultural redefinitions of “aesthetics”. While theories and definitions of speculative photography have existed since the 1970s, they are scattered and cover only select aspects of the broader concept proposed here. This paper argues that speculative photography rejects empiricism and notions of truth while practicing an art of the “medium” in its most literal – physical, artistic and spiritual – meanings.

Keywords:

photography, speculative, experimental photography, computational photography, hauntology, aesthetics, Artificial Intelligence, digicam

Article Details

How to Cite
Cramer, Florian. “Speculative photography: an attempt (essay) of making visible (manifesto)”. Artnodes, no. 34, pp. 1-9, doi:10.7238/artnodes.v0i34.424946.
Author Biography

Florian Cramer, Willem de Kooning Academy, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences

Practice-oriented research professor at Willem de Kooning Academy, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, the Netherlands. He studied Comparative and Art History in Berlin, Konstanz and Amherst/Massachusetts, was a lecturer in Comparative Literature 1998-2004, and has been an art school research professor and tutor in Rotterdam since 2004. Recent publications include: Lumbung, Commons and Community Art, co-authored with Simon Kentgens, Rotterdam: HumDrumPress, 2023, A Near-sighted Falling into Technology: Through the Looking Glass of Art Practice as Human Self-Experimentation, Accidents and Coincidence, with Elaine W. Ho, in: Joke Brouwer & Sjoerd van Tuinen (eds.), Technological Accidents, Accidental Technologies, Rotterdam: V2_ Publishing, 2023; Making Matters. A Vocabulary for Collective Arts, edited with Janneke Wesseling, Anja Groten, Klaas Kuitenbrouwer, Pia Louwerens, Marie-José Sondeijker, Amsterdam: Valiz, 2022; on speculative computational poetics: Words Made Flesh, Piet Zwart Institute, 2005.

References

ALG. “2002.12 cONVENIENCE, tENTATIVELY a, 2002.12 tENTATIVELY, a cONVENIENCE interviewed by aundre-g (Aundre Gandy) for his ‘Strike’ zine”. Idioideo. (n.d.). http://idioideo.pleintekst.nl/InterviewStrike.html. [Accessed: 3 May 2024].

Anonymous. “FAQ”. Aesthetics Wiki. https://aesthetics.fandom.com/wiki/Aesthetics_Wiki:FAQ. [Accessed: 3 February 2024].

Anonymous. “Fotonight Web”. Aesthetics Wiki. https://aesthetics.fandom.com/wiki/Fotonight_Web. [Accessed: 3 February 2024].

Anonymous. “Frutiger Aero”. Aesthetics Wiki. https://aesthetics.fandom.com/wiki/Frutiger_Aero. [Accessed: 3 February 2024].

Anonymous. “List of Aesthetics”. Aesthetics Wiki. https://aesthetics.fandom.com/wiki/List_of_Aesthetics. [Accessed: 3 February 2024].

Barthes, Roland. Writing Degree Zero. New York: Hill & Wang Pub, 1990 [1953].

Buzzo, Daniel. “The Volca project: a sensory experiment in collaborative visualisation”. Transimage 2018. Proceedings of the 5th Biennial Transdisciplinary Imaging Conference. (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3177767

Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. London: Routledge, 2022 [1923]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429284922

Chokkattu, Julian. “The Evolution of Smartphone Night Photography”. Video, 10:31. YouTube (2022). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nk-26lSbIMk. [Accessed: 3 February 2024].

Consumer Aesthetics Research Institute, The. CARI | the Consumer Aesthetics Research Institute. (2024). https://cari.institute/. [Accessed: 3 February 2024].

Cristofovici, Anca. Touching surfaces: Photographic aesthetics, temporality, aging. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401206693

Digicam.love. digicam.love. (2024). http://digicam.love. [Accessed: 3 February 2024].

Fuller, Matthew. Behind the Blip: Software as Culture. New York: Autonomedia, 2003.

Greenway, John L. “The Photograph as Esthetic Norm in Fin-de-Siècle Scandinavia.” Fin(s) de Siècle in Scandinavian Perspective: Studies in Honor of Harald S. Naess, (1993):141-149.

Lachmann, Renate. Erzählte Phantastik. Zu Phantasiegeschichte und Semantik phantastischer Texte. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2002.

Panofsky, Erwin. Perspective as Symbolic Form. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020 [1927].

Saguaro, William. Aesthetic Shit. Apple Music. (2022). https://music.apple.com/us/album/william-saguaro/1645907228. [Accessed: 3 February 2024].

Thomas, Lew. Structural(Ism) and Photography. San Francisco: NFS Press, 1978.

Trachtenberg, Alan. “Camera Work: Notes toward an Investigation”. The Massachusetts Review, vol. 19, no. 4, (1978): 834-858.

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.