Angels and blue brains: aesthetics of knowledge in science and religion
Article Sidebar
Google Scholar citations
Main Article Content
This paper deals with the sensory and culturally situated dimension of knowing, which I refer to as “aesthetics of knowledge”, and focuses on knowing and knowledge in two fields of the modern and contemporary cultural sphere: science and religion. Since its emergence during the 19th century, science has been sharing many elements of the aesthetics of knowledge with modern Western religion. These are shaped by common heritage from the Romantic period and, while often dismissed as superficial borrowings, they contribute to construct scientific meaning. Based on existing literature, this paper endeavours to show how a focus on shared aesthetics of knowledge in science and religion can provide new insights in science, media and art studies by complementing other approaches.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
(c) Arianna Borrelli, 2024
Copyright
For all articles published in Artnodes that are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence, copyright is retained by the author(s). The complete text the license can be consulted at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s).
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary licences for the images that are subject to copyright.
Assignment of intellectual property rights
The author non exclusively transfers the rights to use (reproduce, distribute, publicly broadcast or transform) and market the work, in full or part, to the journal’s editors in all present and future formats and modalities, in all languages, for the lifetime of the work and worldwide.
I hereby declare that I am the original author of the work. The editors shall thus not be held responsible for any obligation or legal action that may derive from the work submitted in terms of violation of third parties’ rights, whether intellectual property, trade secret or any other right.
Arianna Borrelli, Technische Universität Berlin and Bielefeld University
She is a historian and philosopher of natural philosophy and modern science currently teaching at the Technical University in Berlin and Bielefeld University. The focus of her research is the relationship between scientific knowledge and the strategies employed to represent, communicate, store and transform it. Her specific fields of interest include medieval mathematical cosmology, early modern meteorology and mechanics, and quantum theories from their early days up to the present. Currently, she is focussing on the historical-epistemological premises and implications of the increasing use of computational tools in the natural sciences. She worked in research first as a theoretical physicist (Italy, UK, Switzerland), and later in humanities (Braunschweig, Berlin, Lüneburg).
Blue Brain Project. Blue Brain Project. EPFL, (2024). https://www.epfl.ch/research/domains/bluebrain/. [Accessed: 12 February 2024].
Barany, Michael J. and Steve McKenzie. “Chalk: Materials and Concepts in Mathematics Research”. In: C. Coopmans et al. (eds.). Representation in scientific practice revisited, (Cambridge, MY: MIT Press, 2014), 107-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262525381.003.0006
Bond, James D. The Paris Exhibition of 1900, 1900.
Borrelli, Arianna. “Mathematical Notation as a Philosophical Instrument”. In: Siegfried Zielinski and Sylvia Wagnermaieir (eds.). Variantology 1. On Deep Time Relations of Arts, Sciences and Technologies, (Cologne: Walther König, 2005), 279-96.
Borrelli, Arianna. “Crystallogy in the Making”. In: Siegfried Zielinski and Eckhard Fürlus (eds.). Variantology 4: On Deep Time Relations of Arts, Sciences and Technologies in the Arabic-Islamic World and Beyond, (Cologne: Walther König, 2010) 53-86.
Borrelli, Arianna. 2011. “Angular Momentum between Physics and Mathematics”. In: Karl-Heinz Schlote and Martina R. Schneider (eds.). Mathematics Meets Physics, (Harri Deutsch, 2011), 395-440.
Borrelli, Arianna. “Symmetry, Beauty and Belief in High-Energy Physics”. Approaching Religion, vol.7, no. 2 (2017): 22-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30664/ar.67711
Borrelli, Arianna. ‘Poetic Imagination in Scientific Practice: Grand Unification as Narrative Worldmaking’. In: Dirk Johannsen, Anja Kirsch & Jens Kreinath (eds.). Narrative Cultures and the Aesthetics of Religion, (Leiden: Brill, 2020), 314-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004421677_014
Borrelli, Arianna and Alexandra Grieser. 2020. “Aesthetics of Knowledge”. In: Anne Koch and Katharina Wilkens (eds.). The Bloomsbury Handbook of the Cultural and Cognitive Aesthetics of Religion, (London et al.: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020), 33-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350066748.ch-004
Brain, Robert Michael (ed.). Hans Christian Ørsted and the Romantic Legacy in Science: Ideas, Disciplines, Practices. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2987-5
Caneva, Kenneth L. “Physics and Naturphilosophie : A Reconnaissance”. History of Science, vol. 35, no. 1, (1997): 35-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/007327539703500102
Chakravartty, Anjan. 2017. “Scientific Realism”. In: Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2017, Summer Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/scientific-realism/
Daston, Lorraine and Peter Galison. “The Image of Objectivity”. Representations, no. 40, (1992): 81-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2928741
Daston, Lorraine and Peter Galison. Objectivity. New York / Cambridge, Massachusetts: Zone Books, 2007.
De Regt, Henk W. “Beauty in Physical Science circa 2000”. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 16, no. 1, (2002): 95-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590120118855
Dumit, Joseph. Picturing Personhood: Brain Scans and Biomedical Identity. Princeton University Press, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691236629
Galison, Peter and Caroline A. Jones (eds.). Picturing Science, Producing Art. New York: Routledge, 1998.
Garber, Elizabeth. The Language of Physics. Boston: Birkhäuser Boston, 1999.
Gauthier, François. “Consumer Culture and the Sensory Remodelling of Religion”. Aesthetics of Religion, (De Gruyter, 2017), 447-456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110461015-020
Grieser, Alexandra. “Blue Brains: Aesthetic Ideologies and the Formation of Knowledge Between Religion and Science”. Aesthetics of Religion, (De Gruyter, 2017a), 237-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110461015-011
Grieser, Alexandra and Jay Johnston. “What Is an Aesthetics of Religion? From the Senses to Meaning—and Back Again”. In: Alexandra Grieser & Jay Johnston (eds.). Aesthetics of Religion, (De Gruyter, 2017b), 1-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110461015-001
Guggenmos, Esther-Maria. “Smell as Communication”. In: Anne Koch & Katharina Wilkens (eds.). The Bloomsbury Handbook of The Cultural and Cognitive Aesthetics of Religion, (Bloomsbury Academic, 2020), 219-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350066748
Hepburn, Brian and Hanne Andersen. 2021. “Scientific Method”. In: Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (2021, Summer Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/scientific-method/
Hinnells John R. (ed). A New Dictionary of Religions. Oxford: Blackwell, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405166607
Hossenfelder, Sabine. Lost in math: how beauty leads physics astray. New York: Basic Books, 2018.
Human Brain Project. Human Brain Project. Human brain project, (2024). https://www.humanbrainproject.eu/en/. [Accessed: 12 February 2024].
Johnston, Jay. “Esoteric Aesthetics: The Spiritual Matter of Intersubjective Encounter”. In: Alexandra Grieser & Jay Johnston. Aesthetics of Religion, (De Gruyter, 2017), 349-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110461015-015
Johnston, Jay. “A Historiography of Aesthetics in a Western Context”. In: Jay Johnston & Katharina Wilkens (eds.). The Bloomsbury Handbook of The Cultural and Cognitive Aesthetics of Religion, (Bloomsbury Academic, 2020), 13-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350066748
Klein, Ursula. “Paper Tools in Experimental Cultures”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, vol. 32, no. 2, (2001): 265-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(01)00010-3
Koch, Anne. “The Governance of Aesthetic Subjects Through Body Knowledge and Affect Economies. A Cognitive-Aesthetic Approach”. In: Alexandra Grieser & Jay Johnston (eds.). Aesthetics of Religion, (De Gruyter, 2017), 389–412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110461015-017
Koch, Anne and Katharina Wilkens. The Bloomsbury Handbook of the Cultural and Cognitive Aesthetics of Religion. London et al.: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350066748
Latour, Bruno. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1987.
Latour, Bruno. “How to Be Iconophilic in Art, Science and Religion”. In: Peter Galison & Caroline Jones. Picturing Science, Producing Art. (Routledge, 1998), 418-440. DOI: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-02057220
Latour, Bruno. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern”. Critical Inquiry, vol. 30, (2004): 225-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/421123
Latour, Bruno and Peter Weibel (eds.). Iconoclash. Karlsruhe / Cambridge Massachusetts: ZKM, Centre for Art and Media and The MIT Press, 2002.
Lenoir, Timothy, (ed.). Inscribing Science: Scientific Texts and the Materiality of Communication. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.
Lucier, Paul. “Commercial Science”. A Companion to the History of Science, (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2016), 268-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118620762.ch19
Pavese, Carlotta. “Knowledge How”. In: Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman (eds.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (2022, Fall Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/knowledge-how/
Polanyi, Michael. Personal Knowledge: towards a post-crit. philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958.
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford, California: Stanford UnivPress, 1997.
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. Historische Epistemologie zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius-Verlag, 2013.
Rotman, Brian. Ad infinitum: the ghost in Turing’s machine; [taking god out of mathematics and putting the body back in ...; an essay in corporeal semiotics]. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503622135
Staley, Richard. Einstein’s Generation: The Origins of the Relativity Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
Tesla, Nikola. “The Problem of Increasing Human Energy”. Century Magazine, (1900): 175-211.
Varela, Francisco J., Evan Thompson and Eleanor Rosch. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1996.
Valleriani, Matteo. The Structures of Practical Knowledge. Cham: Springer, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45671-3
Wilke, Annette. “Moving Religion by Sound: On the Effectiveness of the Nāda-Brahman in India and Modern Europe”. In: Alexandra Grieser & Jay Johnston (eds.). Aesthetics of Religion, (De Gruyter, 2017), 323-346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110461015-014
Wise, M. Norton. “Mediating Machines”. Science in Context, vol. 2, no.1, (1988): 77-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889700000508
Zielinski, Siegfried. Variations on Media Thinking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctvr6959d
Similar Articles
- Miguel Alfonso Bouhaben, Eurocentric artistic research and the epistemic-aesthetic decolonization , Artnodes: No. 21: (June 2018). NODE 21. Media Archaeology (Editors: Pau Alsina, Ana Rodríguez, Vanina Hofman)
- Sonia 1972 Ríos Moyano, Leticia Crespillo Marí, Javier 1979 González Torres, Anthropological narratives of machinic otherness at the dawn of posthuman and transhuman theories. A first approach from movies and streaming series , Artnodes: No. 32: (July 2023). NODE 32. Possibles III (Editors: Pau Alsina & Andrés Burbano)
- Jordan Fraser Emery, Alba Marín, Body and researcher’s gaze with 360o immersive video: an exploratory case study on the artivism in São Paulo , Artnodes: No. 33: (January 2024). NODE 33. Media Artivism: On the Archaeology and History of Digital Culture for Social Change (Guest Editors: Carolina Fernández-Castrillo & Diego Mantoan)
- Louise Mackenzie, Robertina Šebjanič, Karolina Żyniewicz, Isabel Burr Raty, Dalila Honorato, Staying in Touch: case study of artistic research during the COVID-19 lock-down , Artnodes: No. 27: (January 2021). Node 27. Arts in the Time of Pandemic (Guest Editors: Laura Benítez & Erich Berger)
- Ebru Yetişkin, İsmail Yiğit, Didem Ermiş, Artistic research within a lab of possibilities: exploring post-digital ignorance in “a’21 amberNetworkFestival” , Artnodes: No. 30
- Martin Caeiro Rodríguez, Antonia María Muñiz de la Arena, Expressive cognition as a relationship experience of art and science in pre-university education , Artnodes: No. 24: (July 2019). NODE 24. After post-truth (Editor.: Jorge Luis Marzo)
- Pilar Rosado Rodrigo, Ferran Reverter Comes, Panoramic views on the collective visual heritage through convolutional neural networks. The exhibitions Revolutionary Arkive and Mnemosyne 2.0 by Pilar Rosado , Artnodes: No. 26: (July 2021). NODE 26. AI, Arts & Design: Questioning Learning Machines (Guest Editors: A. Burbano & R. West)
- Diego Ortega Alonso, Illustraciencia, an ecosystem for scientific illustration , Artnodes: No. 32: (July 2023). NODE 32. Possibles III (Editors: Pau Alsina & Andrés Burbano)
- Victor Flores, The Metrics of Landscape. Stereo fieldwork by Francisco Afonso Chaves and other Portuguese Explorers , Artnodes: No. 21: (June 2018). NODE 21. Media Archaeology (Editors: Pau Alsina, Ana Rodríguez, Vanina Hofman)
- Catalina Morla Gayà Morlà, Marta Rizo García, Museums, collective memory and narrative imaginaries. Participatory communication as a strategy for constructing non-hegemonic stories in museums with a social vocation , Artnodes: No. 29: (January 2022). NODE 29. Ecology of the imagination (Guest Editor: Marina Garcés)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.