Social networks and hate speech: an international perspective
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
The work analyses the legislative measures which the Party States in the Additional Protocol at the 2003 Convention on Cybercrime are obliged to adopt in order to harmonise the criminal legislation on the dissemination of "racist and xenophobic material" on the Internet, classifying as criminal certain conduct against individuals or groups for reasons of their race, colour, descent, national or ethnic origin or religion, addressing firstly the interpretative issues which its composition brings forward and which were addressed by the Explanatory Report. Next, there is a study of the problems posed by the application of the criteria resulting from the Protocol to that which is termed "hate speech" in social networks: the intentionality of both the conduct and the effects brought about by the dissemination, taking into account the specifities of the social networks; intentional dissemination to the public in relation to the conduct, which is separate from private communications that are unpunishable due to the predetermination of the recipient, with the problems which arise when the recipient is a group of people; and the definition of the racist and xenophobic material which advocates, promotes or incites hatred, discrimination and violence, by reference to the international instruments in which incitement is a key element so that "imminent danger" is incorporated as an additional implicit requirement in accordance with the recognised North American standard. Finally, there is an examination of how some of these criteria —in particular, the doctrine of "imminent danger"— have been applied in a recent judgement by the European Court of Human Rights in 2018 on Internet hate speech.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright
Contents published in IDP are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Spain licence, the full text of which can be consulted on http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/es/deed.en.
Thus, they may be copied, distributed and broadcast provided that the author and IDP are cited, as shown in the recommended citation that accompanies each article. Derivative works are not permitted.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.
Assignment of intellectual property rights
The author non exclusively transfers the rights to use (reproduce, distribute, publicly broadcast or transform) and market the work, in full or part, to the journal’s editors in all present and future formats and modalities, in all languages, for the lifetime of the work and worldwide.
The author must declare that he is the original author of the work. The editors shall thus not be held responsible for any obligation or legal action that may derive from the work submitted in terms of violation of third parties’ rights, whether intellectual property, trade secret or any other right.
Göran Rollnert Liern, Universidad de Valencia, ES
Holds a doctorate in Law and a degree in Political Sciences, and is Associate Lecturer of Constitutional Law at the University of Valencia. A member of the DerechoTICS (ICT Law) Network (www.derechotics.com), he has participated in various research projects on freedoms of information, open government and social networks. Author of three monographs, 29 book chapters, 24 articles in academic journals and director of a collaborative book. His main lines of research are the Head of State in the parliamentary monarchy, and ideological freedoms and freedoms of expression in relation to incitement to terrorism and hate speech.
Similar Articles
- Clara Marsan Raventós, 70 Years of Human Rights. A critical analysis of the Practice of Humans Rights , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 28 (2019)
- Pablo Martínez Ramil, Is the EU human rights legal framework able to cope with discriminatory AI? , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 34 (2021): December
- Raquel Seijas, European solutions to disinformation and how they may impact on fundamental rights , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 31 (2020)
- Laura Díez Bueso, Freedom of expression on social networks , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 27 (2018)
- Lorenzo Cotino Hueso, The obligation to interact electronically with the Administration and its scarce guarantees , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 26 (2018)
- Mario Santisteban Galarza, Jesús C. Aguerri, Does ChatGPT-4 dream of offensive tweets? An approximation to the potential contributions of generative models in detecting illicit speeches , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 39 (2023): November. Special issue: "Digitization and algorithmization of justice"
- Jesús C. Aguerri, Fernando Miró-Llinares, Offensive and hateful communication or programmed disinformation? , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 37 (2023): March
- Maiia Otchenash, Suing online platforms for copyright infringements: the choice of court and law in the “Project Gutenberg” scenario , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 29 (2019)
- Anatolii Kulish, Valeriia Myrhorod-Karpova, Elena Kiselyova, Liudmila Kysil, Nataliia Isaieva, Efficiency of labour duties performance by civil servants: world experience and prospects in Ukraine , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 40 (2024): March
- Olga Shumilo, Tanel Kerikmäe, The European Approach to Building AI Policy and Governance: A Haven for Bureaucrats or Innovators? , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 34 (2021): December
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.