Teorizando el arte de los medios a la luz de los CTS: Factura de lo efímero

Main Article Content

Ksenia Fedorova
Silvia Casini

Throughout history, and particularly in recent decades, art has developed unique media-specific characteristics to address the impact of the techno-scientific paradigm on culture and society. Parallel reflections have occurred in the social sciences, especially within science and technology studies (STS). Some of its most influential methodological insights and concepts – such as actor-network theory, nonhuman agency, boundary objects, trading zones, and material heterogeneities of knowledge – share a focus on the performative rather than representational aspects of scientific practice, on the epistemology of networks and actions rather than on the ontology of substances. The performative aspect of science, for instance, comes to the forefront with Andrew Pickering’s concept of “mangle of practice” (1995), characterized by ongoing interactions between machines, instruments, people, facts and theories that are “mangled” together, shaped by the contingencies of time, space, and culture. The movement between these agents consists of continuous observations, adjustments, and gestures; it is a “dance of agency” (1995, 21) – iterative and recursive, occurring between humans and nonhumans. Although these interactions take place in the laboratory, where phenomena are displaced from the world into the lab with the aim of producing knowledge, the dance of agency anchors scientific practice to the world.

Palabras clave
estudios de ciencia y tecnología

Article Details

Cómo citar
Fedorova, Ksenia; Casini, Silvia. «Teorizando el arte de los medios a la luz de los CTS: Factura de lo efímero». Artnodes, 2025, n.º 35, pp. 1-9, doi:10.7238/artnodes.v0i35.432584.
Biografía del autor/a

Ksenia Fedorova, Universidad de Leiden

Profesora adjunta en la Universidad de Leiden, Países Bajos. Es autora de Tactics of Interfacing: Encoding Affect in Art and Technology (MIT Press, 2020) y coeditora de Media: Between Magic and Technology (2014, en ruso). Sus otras publicaciones han aparecido en Leonardo Electronic Almanac, Media & Culture Journal, Acoustic Space, Dialog of Arts y numerosos volúmenes editados. Sus intereses abarcan la teoría del arte en los medios y la historia, los estudios científicos y tecnológicos, la estética y la filosofía, centrándose en los efectos de las tecnologías en la percepción y la interacción humanas. Ksenia tiene un doctorado en Estudios Culturales de la Universidad de California Davis y un doctorado en Filosofía de la Universidad Federal Ural/Universidad Estatal de San Petersburgo. En 2007-2011, inició y dirigió El Programa Arte. Ciencia. Tecnología en la sucursal Ural del Centro Nacional de Arte Contemporáneo (Ekaterimburgo, Rusia). En 2018-2020 fue investigadora Alexander von Humboldt en la Universidad Humboldt de Berlín.

Silvia Casini, Universidad de Aberdeen

Lectora en Cine y Cultura Visual en la Universidad de Aberdeen (Reino Unido). Es autora de dos monografías, Giving Bodies back to Data (2021, MIT Press) e Il Ritratto Scansione (2016 en italiano, Mimesis). Capacitada en filosofía y ciencia de la imagen, se centra en las implicaciones estéticas, epistemológicas y sociales de la visualización de datos científicos, especialmente en el caso de las tecnologías emergentes, que a menudo combinan la investigación con proyectos curativos de ciencias del arte. La investigación de Casini, respaldada por subvenciones procedentes, entre otras, de The Leverhulme Trust, AHRC y Carnegie Trust, aparece en revistas internacionales como Configurations, Leonardo, Contemporary Aesthetics, Nuncius: Journal of the Material and Visual History of Science, Science as Culture, The Senses and Society. Pasó periodos de visita en la Universidad de Padua y en el MPIWG de Berlín. Las publicaciones recientes incluyen «The Space between Bodies: Exploring Contagion without Contact from Cohl’s Animated Cephaloscope (1910) to Feuerstein’s Borgy & Bes (2018)» y «Communicating science through films: the casi of the International Festival of Scientific and Educational Film (1956–1975)».

Citas

Audétat, Marc. “Promising Technosciences in the Economy of Attention: Why Have Pessimistic Stories of Disruption and ‘Artificial Intelligence’ Performed so Well?”. Tecnoscienza – Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, (2022): 35-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2038-3460/17578

Badiou, Alan. Being and Event. (New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013).

Barry, Andrew, Georgina Born, and Gisa Weszkalnys. “Logics of Interdisciplinarity”. Economy and Society, vol. 37, no. 1, (2008): 20–49. DOI:10.1080/03085140701760841.

Borgdorff, Henk, Peter Peters, Trevor Pinch. Dialogues Between Artistic Research and Science and Technology Studies. (New Work: Routledge, 2020).

Broeckmann, Andreas. “Media Faktura. On some Technical Conditions of Image-Making in Art”. Artifact, vol. IV, no. 1, (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14434/artifact.v4i1.13125

Daniels, Dieter, Barbara U, Schmidt. Artists as Inventors - Inventors as Artists. (Berlin: Hatje Cantz Verlag Gmbh & Co Kg, 2008).

Dunne, Anthony and Fiona Raby 2013. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction and Social Dreaming. (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2013).

Federici, Silvia. Re-enchanting the World: Feminism and the Politics of the Commons. (Oakland: PM Press / Kairos, 2018).

Ginsberg, Alexandra Daisy, Jane Calvert, Pablo Schyfter, Alistair Elfick and Drew Endy. Synthetic Aesthetics: Investigating Synthetic Biology’s Designs on Nature. (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2014).

Haraway, Donna. Staying with the Trouble. (Durham: Duke University Press, 2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q

Holzheid, Anett and Thomas Feuerstein. “From Symbols to Metabols: Capacity for Synthesis in the Visual Arts”. In; Thomas Feuerstein, Jens Hauser and Lucie Strecker (eds.). Life Is Other: A/Biotic Entanglements in Art and Curating. (Berlin, Boston: dG Arts, 2025), 46-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783689240110-003

Ingold, Tim. “Anthropology contra Ethnography”. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 7, no. 1, (2017): 21-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.005

Jones, Caroline A. Sensorium. Embodied Experience, Technology, and Contemporary Art. (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2006).

Kreplak, Yaël. “Artworks in and as Practices. The Relevance of Particulars”. In: Philippe Sormani, Guelfo Carbone, Priska Gisler (eds.). Practicing Art/Science. Experiments in an Emerging Field. (New York: Routledge, 2018), 142-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315175881-8

Krtilova, Katerina. “Media Matter: Materiality and Performativity in Media Theory”. In: Bernd Herzogenrath (ed.). Media|matter: the materiality of media|matter as medium. (New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015), 28-43.

Law, John. After Method. Mess in Social Science Research. (New York: Routledge, 2004).

Mersch, Dieter. “Meta / Dia: Two Different Approaches to the Medial”. In: Cultural Studies, vol. 30, no. 4, (2016): 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2016.1180751

Mol, Annemarie. The Body Multiple. Ontology in Medical Practice. (Durham: Duke University Press, 2002). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1220nc1.

Münker, Stefan and Alexander Roesler. Was ist ein Medium? (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2008).

Myers, Nathasha. Rendering Life Molecular. Models, Modelers, and Excitable Matter. (Durham: Duke University Press, 2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1168bb1

Offenhuber, Dietmar. Autographic Design. The Matter of Data in a Self-Inscribing World. (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14666.001.0001

Penny, Simon. Making Sense: Cognition, Computing, and Embodiment. (Cambridge MA: MIT University Press, 2017).

Pickering, Andrew. The Mangle of Practice. Time, Agency, and Science. (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226668253.001.0001

Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. “Experimental Systems, Graphematic Spaces”. In: Timothy Lenoir (ed.). Inscribing Science: Scientific Texts and the Materiality of Communication. (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998), 285-303.

Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. Split and Splice: a Phenomenology of Experimentation. (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226825311.001.0001

Rogers, Hannah Star, Megan K. Halpern, Dehlia Hannah and Kathryn de Ridder-Vignone (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Art, Science, and Technology Studies. (New York: Routledge, 2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429437069

Salter, Chris, Regula Valérie Burri and Joseph Dumit. “Art, Design, and Performance”. In: Felt, Ulrike, Rayvon Fouché, Clark A. Miller, and Laurel Smith-Doerr (eds.). The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 4th edition. (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2017), 139-167.

Salter, Chris. Sensing Machines, How Sensors Shape Our Everyday Life. (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12116.001.0001

Salter, Chris. Alien Agency. Experimental Encounters with Art in the Making. (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9356.001.0001

Salter, Chris. Entangled: Technology and the Transformation of Performance. (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2010). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262195881.001.0001

Snow, Charles P. The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. The Rede Lecture 1959. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1959).

Sormani, Philippe, Guelfo Carbone and Priska Gisler (eds.). Practicing Art/Science: Experiments in an Emerging Field. (New York: Routledge, 2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315175881

van Heur, Bas, Loet Leydesdorff and Sally Wyatt. “Turning to ontology in STS? Turning to STS through ‘ontology’”. Social Studies of Science, vol. 43, no. 3, (2013): 341-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712458144

Vertesi, Janet. Seeing Like a Rover: How Robots, Teams, and Images Craft Knowledge of Mars. (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226156019.001.0001

Woolgar, Steve and Javier Lezaun. “The wrong bin bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies?”. Social Studies of Science, vol. 43, no. 3, (2013): 321-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713488820

Artículos similares

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.