Between comprehensive imagination and compassionate imagination. Notes for a pedagogy

Main Article Content

Belén Altuna

The text asks about the possible functions of imagination in the ethical-political sphere and argues in favour of the pedagogical promotion of two different, albeit strongly related, forms of imagination: the comprehensive imagination, which involves developing “a broad way of thinking”, as Hannah Arendt characterises it, and the compassionate imagination, which involves an enhancement of not only the cognitive aspects of this faculty but also of the affective and empathic ones, as Martin Hoffman stresses. Finally, we review some authors and pedagogical traditions that have promoted one of these forms of imagination or, even better, a combination of both. We are talking about educational training that aims to broaden the mind and cultivate humanity, helping to form critical citizens committed to the search for fairer and more equitable forms of coexistence.

Keywords
imagination, sympathy, perspective-taking, mental representation

Article Details

How to Cite
Altuna, Belén. “Between comprehensive imagination and compassionate imagination. Notes for a pedagogy”. Artnodes, no. 29, pp. 1-9, doi:10.7238/artnodes.v0i29.393021.
Author Biography

Belén Altuna, Faculty of Education, Philosophy and Anthropology. University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)

Doctor of Philosophy and teacher of Ethics and Political philosophy in the Faculty of Education, Philosophy and Anthropology from the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), in Donostia-San Sebastián. Among her published works are the books Euskaldun fededun. Euskaldun ona izateko modu baten historia (Alberdania, 2003; in Spanish El buen vasco. La tradición ‘Euskaldun fededun’, Hiria, 2012) and Una historia moral del rostro (Pre-Textos, 2010), as well as numerous articles.  After the ethics and anthropology of the face and the otherness developed in the latter book, inspired among other things by the school of thought of Emmanuel Lévinas and Paul Ricoeur, her research has aimed to go into depth on some of the mechanisms that operate in a true “banality of evil”: the biases and limitations of our empathic capacity, the difficulties we face when putting ourselves in others’ shoes, and the various forms of moral bias. Faced with this, she has studied the ways in which an ethical imagination could be driven at the level of the challenges of our time, tied to a principle of responsibility which has been appropriately expanded, which she will pick up in a book soon to be published.

References

Altuna, Belén. «La imaginación moral, o la ética como actividad imaginativa». Daimon, Revista Internacional de Filosofía, no. 74 (2018ª).

Altuna, Belén. «Empatía y moralidad: las dimensiones psicológicas y filosóficas de una relación compleja». Revista de Filosofía, vol. 43, no. 2 (2018b). Universidad Complutense. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/RESF.62029.

Arendt, Hannah. De la historia a la acción. Barcelona: Paidós, 1998.

Arendt, Hannah. Entre el pasado y el futuro. Barcelona: Península, 2003a.

Arendt, Hannah. Conferencia sobre la filosofía política de Kant. Barcelona: Paidós, 2003b.

Armstrong, Karen. Doce pasos hacia una vida compasiva. Barcelona: Paidós, 2011.

Batson, David. «These things called Empathy: eight related but distinct Phenomena». En: Decety & Ickes (eds.). The Social Neuroscience of Empathy (2011). Massachusests Institute of Technology,

Chavel, Solange. Se mettre à la place d’autrui. L’imagination moral. Press Universitaires de Rennes, 2012.

Coeckelbergh, Mark. Imagination and Principles. An Essay on the Role of Imagination in Moral Reasoning. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230589803.

Davis, Mark H. Empathy: a social psychological approach. Boulder: Westview Press, 1996.

Dewey, John. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Simon & Brown, 2011.

Eisenberg, Nanacy, Strayer, Janet. La empatía y su desarrollo. Bilbao: Desclée de Brower, 1992.

Fasmire, Steven. «Morality as Art: Dewey, Metaphor, and Moral Imagination». Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society, vol. 35, no. 3 (1999).

Garcés, Marina. Escuela de aprendices. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg, 2020.

Gibert, Martin. L’imagination en morale. Herman, L’avocat du diable, 2014.

Hoffman, Martin L. Desarrollo moral y empatía. Implicaciones para la atención y la justicia. Barcelona: Idea Books, 2002.

Kohlberg, Lawrence. Psicología del desarrollo moral. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer, 1992.

Mills, Charles Wright. La imaginación sociológica. México: FCE, 2004.

Nussbaum, Martha. El cultivo de la humanidad. Una defensa clásica de la reforma en la educación liberal. Andrés Bello, 2001.

Nussbaum, Martha. Sin fines de lucro. Por qué la democracia necesita de las humanidades. Katz, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvndv60c.

Oxley, Julinna. The moral dimensions of Empathy. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230347809.

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Emilio (1762). Madrid: Alianza, 1998.

Vetlesen, Arne Johan. Perception, Empathy and Judgement. Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271071794.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.