New ways of hiding: towards metainterface realism
Article Sidebar
Google Scholar citations
Main Article Content
Interfaces have a history of realism as attempts to map, represent and interact with reality. However, recent changes in the interface, including both the way we understand, use, design and build interfaces, merits a new discussion of its realism. The contemporary interface is both omnipresent and invisible, at once integrated into everyday objects and characterised by hidden exchanges of information between objects. With the current spread of mobile devices, embedded sensors, cloud services, and data capture, a new interface paradigm, the metainterface, arises where data and software disappear from our devices and into the global cloud. The metainterface indicates that the interface has become more abstract, generalised, but also spatialised in the sense of being ubiquitous, mobile, urban and related to the things of our environment. The metainterface as a concept, industry and art/design practice calls for a new kind of realism which combines what you see (e.g. the data, tools, operations, transactions) with how you see it (the metainterface and its software, networks and executions), including how it sees you (how the user/users are captured, datafied, profiled, computed and ‘executed’). In other ways we need a ‘way of seeing’ that goes beyond the visual and integrates the metainterface and its effects. Currently these effects can be seen as two ways of hiding: 1) Minimalist hiding, e.g. the hiding of the datafication, monitoring and profiling going on in cloud computing infrastructures behind its immediate, minimalist user-interface. 2) Environmental hiding, including hiding its mode of control as smart for example. These dimensions are often combined but can be investigated in workshops for metainterface realism. This article will discuss these options by looking at art that explores and produces alternatives to this seeming disappearance by the artists Ben Grosser, Joana Moll, James Bridle, EL Putnam and workshops by Joana Moll and the authors et al.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
(c) Søren Bro Pold, 2019
Copyright
For all articles published in Artnodes that are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence, copyright is retained by the author(s). The complete text the license can be consulted at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s).
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary licences for the images that are subject to copyright.
Assignment of intellectual property rights
The author non exclusively transfers the rights to use (reproduce, distribute, publicly broadcast or transform) and market the work, in full or part, to the journal’s editors in all present and future formats and modalities, in all languages, for the lifetime of the work and worldwide.
I hereby declare that I am the original author of the work. The editors shall thus not be held responsible for any obligation or legal action that may derive from the work submitted in terms of violation of third parties’ rights, whether intellectual property, trade secret or any other right.
Søren Bro Pold, Aarhus University (Denmark)
Søren Bro Pold (PhD, associate professor, Aarhus University) has published on digital and media aesthetics – from the 19th century panorama to the interface in its different forms, e.g. on electronic literature, net art, software art, creative software, urban, mobile and cloud interfaces, activism, surveillance culture and digital culture. His main research field is interface criticism which discusses the role and the development of the interface for art, literature, aesthetics, culture and IT. Together with Christian Ulrik Andersen he edited the anthology Interface Criticism (2011) and published The Metainterface – The Art of Platforms, Cities and Clouds (MIT Press, 2018). http://pure.au.dk/portal/en/pold@cavi.au.dk
Andersen, Christian Ulrik, Martin Brynskov, Geoff Cox, Lone Koefoed Hansen, Henrik Korsgaard, Pernille Kølbæk, Lasse Vestergaard, and Søren Pold. 2012. Instant Kafé. http://cavi.au.dk/research/instant-kafe/
https://vimeo.com/45155827.
Andersen, Christian Ulrik, and Søren Pold. 2018. The Metainterface: The art of platforms, cities and clouds. Cambridge, Massachusetts. London, England: MIT Press.
Bridle, James. 2016. Diorama (for Louis Daguerre). https://jamesbridle.com/works/diorama-for-louis-daguerre.
Bridle, James. 2017. Autonomous Trap 001. https://jamesbridle.com/works/autonomous-trap-001.
Campbell-Dollaghan, Kelsey. 2018. “Safebook is Facebook, except totally, gloriously empty”. Fast Company, 09.12.
DiSalvo, Carl. 2018. “Bruno Latour as Sociologist and Design Theorists?”. In Critical Theory and Interaction Design, edited by Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell and Mark Blythe. Cambridge Mass.: MIT-Press.
Galloway, Alexander R. 2013. “The Poverty of Philosophy: Realism and Post-Fordism.” Critical Inquiry 39 (2): 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1086/668529. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/668529.
Grosser, Benjamin. 2014. “What Do Metrics Want? How Quantification Prescribes Social Interaction on Facebook”. Computational Culture (4). http://computationalculture.net/article/what-do-metrics-want.
Grosser, 2018-. Safebook. https://bengrosser.com/projects/safebook/.
Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective”. Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3178066.
Hu, Tung-Hui. 2015. A prehistory of the cloud. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London, England: The MIT Press.
Lialina, Olia, and Dragan Espenschied, eds. 2009. Digital Folklore Reader. Stuttgart: merz & solitude.
Lukács, Georg. 1965. “II Verlorene Illusionen”. In Georg Lukács Werke 6 – Probleme des Realismus III – Der historische Roman, 474–489. Neuwied und Berlin: Luchterhand.
Moll, Joana. 2016a. “Poetic Deconstruction of the Interface”. Hangar. https://janavirgin.com/HANGAR/.
Moll, Joana. 2016b. The Virtual Watchers. http://www.virtualwatchers.de/.
Moll, Joana. 2017. Algorithms Allowed. http://www.janavirgin.com/ALGORITHMS_ALLOWED/.
O’Neill, Paul. 2018. “On Dublin, Amazon, and the “Secret Region.”” Dublin InQuirer, 28 November, 2018. https://dublininquirer.com/2018/11/28/paul-on-dublin-amazon-and-the-secret-region.
Pold, Søren. 2000. “Panoramic Realism: An early and illustrative passage from urban space to media space in Honoré de Balzac’s Parisian novels, Ferragus and Le Père Goriot”. Nineteenth-Century French Studies 29 (1/2): 47–63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23538115.
Pold, Søren. 2005. “Interface Realisms: The Interface as Aesthetic Form”. Postmodern Culture 15 (2). http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/postmodern_culture/v015/15.2pold.html
Putnam, EL. 2018. Quickening. http://www.elputnam.com/quickening.html.
Sollfrank, Cornelia, ed. 2018. Die schönen Kriegerinnen – Technofeministische Praxis im 21. Jahrhundert Vienna: Transversal.
Whittaker, Meredith, et al. 2018. AI Now Report 2018. AI Now Institute, New York University (New York). https://ainowinstitute.org/AI_Now_2018_Report.html.
Zuboff, Shoshana. 2015. “Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization”. Journal of Information Technology (30): 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2594754.
Similar Articles
- Predrag K. Nikolić, Giacomo Bertin, AI.R Taletorium: Artificial Intelligence 1001 Cyber Nights , Artnodes: No. 31: (January 2023). NODE 31. Possibles II (Editors: Pau Alsina & Andrés Burbano)
- Alessandro Manetti, Pablo Lara-Navarra, Jordi Sánchez-Navarro, Possibilities for futurecasting: designing a digital map of trends , Artnodes: No. 30
- Joshua Korenblat, Laia Solé Coromina, Undesigned World: what educating through walking means in the Anthropocene , Artnodes: No. 32: (July 2023). NODE 32. Possibles III (Editors: Pau Alsina & Andrés Burbano)
- Laura Benítez Valero, Erich Berger, First Response , Artnodes: No. 27: (January 2021). Node 27. Arts in the Time of Pandemic (Guest Editors: Laura Benítez & Erich Berger)
- Andreu Belsunces, Laura Benítez Valero, Ulrich Brandstätter, César Escudero, Fabricio Lamoncha, Paula Pin, Enrique Tomás, Diffractive Interfaces: diffraction as an artistic research methodology , Artnodes: No. 20: (December 2017). NODE 20. Art and Research (Editors: Pau Alsina, Ana Rodríguez, Irma Vilà Òdena)
- María de la O Artiles Burgos, Javier Boned Purkiss, Modern Architecture and Transparencies: Materiality and Virtuality , Artnodes: No. 15: (June 2015). NODE 15. Art Matters I (Editors: Pau Alsina, Ana Rodríguez Granell)
- Narcís , 1966- Parés, Roc Parés i Burguès, An interaction-driven strategy for virtual reality applications , Artnodes: No. 1 (2002): NODE 1. Art, science and technology
- Marcelo Alejandro Fraile-Narvaez, The author and the interpreter: a contemporary look at Peter Eisenman's Biocenter project for the University of Frankfurt , Artnodes: No. 29: (January 2022). NODE 29. Ecology of the imagination (Guest Editor: Marina Garcés)
- Johanna Caplliure, Anticipation stories that augure possible worlds , Artnodes: No. 32: (July 2023). NODE 32. Possibles III (Editors: Pau Alsina & Andrés Burbano)
- Diego Díaz, Clara Boj, A critical approach to Machine Learning forecast capabilities: creating a predictive biography in the age of the Internet of Behaviour (IoB) , Artnodes: No. 31: (January 2023). NODE 31. Possibles II (Editors: Pau Alsina & Andrés Burbano)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.