New ways of hiding: towards metainterface realism

Main Article Content

Søren Bro Pold

Interfaces have a history of realism as attempts to map, represent and interact with reality. However, recent changes in the interface, including both the way we understand, use, design and build interfaces, merits a new discussion of its realism. The contemporary interface is both omnipresent and invisible, at once integrated into everyday objects and characterised by hidden exchanges of information between objects. With the current spread of mobile devices, embedded sensors, cloud services, and data capture, a new interface paradigm, the metainterface, arises where data and software disappear from our devices and into the global cloud. The metainterface indicates that the interface has become more abstract, generalised, but also spatialised in the sense of being ubiquitous, mobile, urban and related to the things of our environment. The metainterface as a concept, industry and art/design practice calls for a new kind of realism which combines what you see (e.g. the data, tools, operations, transactions) with how you see it (the metainterface and its software, networks and executions), including how it sees you (how the user/users are captured, datafied, profiled, computed and ‘executed’). In other ways we need a ‘way of seeing’ that goes beyond the visual and integrates the metainterface and its effects. Currently these effects can be seen as two ways of hiding: 1) Minimalist hiding, e.g. the hiding of the datafication, monitoring and profiling going on in cloud computing infrastructures behind its immediate, minimalist user-interface. 2) Environmental hiding, including hiding its mode of control as smart for example. These dimensions are often combined but can be investigated in workshops for metainterface realism. This article will discuss these options by looking at art that explores and produces alternatives to this seeming disappearance by the artists Ben Grosser, Joana Moll, James Bridle, EL Putnam and workshops by Joana Moll and the authors et al.

Keywords
realism; metainterface; interface criticism; critical theory; the design of transparency

Article Details

How to Cite
Pold, Søren Bro. “New ways of hiding: towards metainterface realism”. Artnodes, no. 24, pp. 72-82, doi:10.7238/a.v0i24.3283.
Author Biography

Søren Bro Pold, Aarhus University (Denmark)

Søren Bro Pold (PhD, associate professor, Aarhus University) has published on digital and media aesthetics – from the 19th century panorama to the interface in its different forms, e.g. on electronic literature, net art, software art, creative software, urban, mobile and cloud interfaces, activism, surveillance culture and digital culture. His main research field is interface criticism which discusses the role and the development of the interface for art, literature, aesthetics, culture and IT. Together with Christian Ulrik Andersen he edited the anthology Interface Criticism (2011) and published The Metainterface – The Art of Platforms, Cities and Clouds (MIT Press, 2018). http://pure.au.dk/portal/en/pold@cavi.au.dk

References
Agre, Philip E. 2003. “Surveillance and Capture: Two Models of Privacy”. In The New Media Reader, edited by Noah Wardrip-Fruin & Nick Montfort, 737–760. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London, England: The MIT Press.

Andersen, Christian Ulrik, Martin Brynskov, Geoff Cox, Lone Koefoed Hansen, Henrik Korsgaard, Pernille Kølbæk, Lasse Vestergaard, and Søren Pold. 2012. Instant Kafé. http://cavi.au.dk/research/instant-kafe/
https://vimeo.com/45155827.

Andersen, Christian Ulrik, and Søren Pold. 2018. The Metainterface: The art of platforms, cities and clouds. Cambridge, Massachusetts. London, England: MIT Press.

Bridle, James. 2016. Diorama (for Louis Daguerre). https://jamesbridle.com/works/diorama-for-louis-daguerre.

Bridle, James. 2017. Autonomous Trap 001. https://jamesbridle.com/works/autonomous-trap-001.
Campbell-Dollaghan, Kelsey. 2018. “Safebook is Facebook, except totally, gloriously empty”. Fast Company, 09.12.

DiSalvo, Carl. 2018. “Bruno Latour as Sociologist and Design Theorists?”. In Critical Theory and Interaction Design, edited by Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell and Mark Blythe. Cambridge Mass.: MIT-Press.

Galloway, Alexander R. 2013. “The Poverty of Philosophy: Realism and Post-Fordism.” Critical Inquiry 39 (2): 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1086/668529. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/668529.

Grosser, Benjamin. 2014. “What Do Metrics Want? How Quantification Prescribes Social Interaction on Facebook”. Computational Culture (4). http://computationalculture.net/article/what-do-metrics-want.

Grosser, 2018-. Safebook. https://bengrosser.com/projects/safebook/.

Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective”. Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3178066.

Hu, Tung-Hui. 2015. A prehistory of the cloud. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London, England: The MIT Press.

Lialina, Olia, and Dragan Espenschied, eds. 2009. Digital Folklore Reader. Stuttgart: merz & solitude.

Lukács, Georg. 1965. “II Verlorene Illusionen”. In Georg Lukács Werke 6 – Probleme des Realismus III – Der historische Roman, 474–489. Neuwied und Berlin: Luchterhand.

Moll, Joana. 2016a. “Poetic Deconstruction of the Interface”. Hangar. https://janavirgin.com/HANGAR/.
Moll, Joana. 2016b. The Virtual Watchers. http://www.virtualwatchers.de/.

Moll, Joana. 2017. Algorithms Allowed. http://www.janavirgin.com/ALGORITHMS_ALLOWED/.

O’Neill, Paul. 2018. “On Dublin, Amazon, and the “Secret Region.”” Dublin InQuirer, 28 November, 2018. https://dublininquirer.com/2018/11/28/paul-on-dublin-amazon-and-the-secret-region.

Pold, Søren. 2000. “Panoramic Realism: An early and illustrative passage from urban space to media space in Honoré de Balzac’s Parisian novels, Ferragus and Le Père Goriot”. Nineteenth-Century French Studies 29 (1/2): 47–63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23538115.

Pold, Søren. 2005. “Interface Realisms: The Interface as Aesthetic Form”. Postmodern Culture 15 (2). http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/postmodern_culture/v015/15.2pold.html

Putnam, EL. 2018. Quickening. http://www.elputnam.com/quickening.html.
Sollfrank, Cornelia, ed. 2018. Die schönen Kriegerinnen – Technofeministische Praxis im 21. Jahrhundert Vienna: Transversal.

Whittaker, Meredith, et al. 2018. AI Now Report 2018. AI Now Institute, New York University (New York). https://ainowinstitute.org/AI_Now_2018_Report.html.

Zuboff, Shoshana. 2015. “Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization”. Journal of Information Technology (30): 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2594754.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.