Restriction of minors’ access to online pornography: solutions provided by the law
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
This article analyzes the ways that the Spanish legal system offers to restrict minors’ access to pornographic content on the internet. Currently, this access can be characterized as unhindered and generalized. First, the paper presents the constitutional rights and interests in conflict when restricting traffic and access to pornography on the internet. Next, it analyzes the legal regulations in force in our system that could offer a solution to minors’ access to pornography and discusses their practical usefulness. The article closes with some conclusions and proposals for regulatory improvement.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
(c) Juan María Martínez Otero, 2024
Copyright
Contents published in IDP are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Spain licence, the full text of which can be consulted on http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/es/deed.en.
Thus, they may be copied, distributed and broadcast provided that the author and IDP are cited, as shown in the recommended citation that accompanies each article. Derivative works are not permitted.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.
Assignment of intellectual property rights
The author non exclusively transfers the rights to use (reproduce, distribute, publicly broadcast or transform) and market the work, in full or part, to the journal’s editors in all present and future formats and modalities, in all languages, for the lifetime of the work and worldwide.
The author must declare that he is the original author of the work. The editors shall thus not be held responsible for any obligation or legal action that may derive from the work submitted in terms of violation of third parties’ rights, whether intellectual property, trade secret or any other right.
Juan Martínez Otero, University of Valencia
Full professor of Administrative Law at the University of Valencia. His main lines of research are related to the exercise of communication rights, the regulation of the audiovisual sector and the protection of minors. He is the author, among other works, of the following monograph: El Ejercicio de la Potestad Sancionadora de la Administración en el Ámbito Audiovisual, edited by Tirant lo Blanch in 2021. He has two six-year terms of research recognized by the CNEAI. He has spent several research stays at the Universities of Cambridge, Oxford, King’s College of London and Santa Croce (Rome).
BALLESTER, LL.; ORTE, C. (2019). Nueva pornografía y cambios en las relaciones interpersonales. Barcelona: Octaedro.
BETANCOR RODRÍGUEZ, A. (2007). «¿Están justificadas las autoridades administrativas de control del contenido de las emisiones?». Revista catalana de dret públic, n.º 34, págs. 31-82.
DAWSON, K. et al. (2019). «Adolescent sexual aggressiveness and pornography use: A longitudinal assessment». Aggress Behav, vol. 45, n.º 6, págs. 587-597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21854
DE ALARCÓN, R. et al. (2019). «Online Porn Addiction: What We Know and What We Don’t – A systematic Review». Journal of Clinical Medicine, n.º 15, págs. 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8010091
DE MIGUEL ASENSO, P.A. (2022). «Plataformas de intercambio de vídeos, influyentes y streamers en la Ley 13/2022 General de Comunicación Audiovisual». La Ley Unión Europea, n.º 196, págs. 1-12.
FISCALÍA GENERAL DEL ESTADO (2022). Memoria Anual 2021. Madrid.
GÓMEZ TOMILLO, M. (2015). «Artículo 186». Comentarios prácticos al Código Penal. Tomo II, págs. 553-558. Cizur Menor: Thomson Reuters – Aranzadi.
GUICHOT REINA, E. (2023). «Introducción a la reforma y ámbito de aplicación de la LGCA». Revista General de Derecho Administrativo, n.º 63, págs. 1-33.
HARDY, B. (2023, 10 de agosto). «State age-verification laws have the internet porn industry on the defensive». Arkansas Times [en línea]. Disponible en: https://arktimes.com/arkansas-blog/2023/08/10/state-age-verification-laws-have-the-internet-porn-industry-on-the-defensive
HERVÍAS ORTEGA, F. et al. (2020). «Adicción a la pornografía en Internet: análisis de un caso clínico». Psicología conductual, n.º 28, págs. 161-180.
LLOPIS NADAL, P. (2018). La protección de la propiedad intelectual vulnerada en Internet. Madrid: Instituto de Derecho de Autor.
MALEM SEÑA, J. (1992). «Pornografía y feminismo radical». Doxa: Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, n.º 12, págs. 177-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/DOXA1992.12.06
MARTÍNEZ OTERO, J. M. (2021). «¿Resulta constitucional restringir la pornografía en Internet?». Revista General de Derecho Constitucional, n.º 35, págs. 1-38.
MATA Y MARTÍN, R. M. (2007). «Delitos cometidos mediante sistemas informáticos». Delito e informática: algunos aspectos, págs. 129-172. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.
MILANO, V. (dir.) (2022). Estudio sobre pornografía en las Illes Balears. Palma de Mallorca: Conselleria de Presidencia, Función Pública e Igualdad.
ORTS, E.; ROIG, M. (2001). Delitos informáticos y delitos comunes cometidos a través de la informática. València: Tirant lo Blanch.
SÁNCHEZ MELGAR, J. (Coord.) (2016). Código Penal. Comentarios y Jurisprudencia, 4ª ed. Madrid: Sepin.
URÍAS MARTÍNEZ, J. (2018). «Artículo 20.1.b. La libertad de creación». Comentarios a la Constitución Española, págs. 617-625. Tomo I. Madrid: BOE.
VALERO HEREDIA, A. (2022). La libertad de la pornografía. Sevilla: Athenaica.
VALERO HEREDIA, A. (2023). «Sexo, arte y pornografía». Libertad, arte y cultura. Reflexiones jurídicas sobre la libertad de creación artística, págs. 343-372. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Similar Articles
- Daniel Arnaiz Boluda, On the urgent need to overregulate the activity of underage influencers , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 43 (2025): October
- Cristina Blasi Casagran, Lidia Ballesta Marti, Santiago Robert Guillén, Eduard Blasi Casagran, Navigating the AI legal landscape. Gender implications of large language models in legal text generation , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 44: Special issue on the consolidation of remote work (March 2026)
- Jorge Agustín Viguri Cordero, ISO/IEC standards as mechanisms of proactive responsibility in the General Data Protection Regulation , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 33 (2021): October
- Enas Qutieshat, Muhamad Khairun Kurniawan Kadir, Driss Ed.daran, Sofyan Piyo, Nurul Fazri Elfikri, Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar, Ramadhan Usman, Algorithmic justice and the challenges of the digital rule of law , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 45 (2026): October
- Alba Soriano Arnanz, Creating non-discriminatory Artificial Intelligence systems: balancing the tensions between code granularity and the general nature of legal rules , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 38 (2023): October
- Gergely Ferenc Lendvai, Gergely Gosztonyi, Deepfake and disinformation – What can the law do about fake news created with deepfake? , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 41 (2024): October
- Anatolii Kulish, Valeriia Myrhorod-Karpova, Elena Kiselyova, Liudmila Kysil, Nataliia Isaieva, Efficiency of labour duties performance by civil servants: world experience and prospects in Ukraine , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 40 (2024): March
- Ricardo Pazos Castro, The defectiveness of the product in the new European Directive 2024/2853 , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 43 (2025): October
- David Comet-Herrera, Lucía Benítez-Eyzaguirre, The Spanish state’s virtual public procurement platforms and their transparency on the consideration of strategic procurement criteria , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 40 (2024): March
- Marc Salat Paisal, The use of artificial intelligence in the police and judicial investigation of online child sex grooming crimes in Spain , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 42 (2025): March
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.