The human body from a biotechnological perspective in art contexts: active space of experimentation in constant transformation
Article Sidebar
Google Scholar citations
Main Article Content
Over the last three decades, the rise of new conceptualizations around the human body in connection with technology and machines has led to the development of new art practices in parallel with technological advances in the fields of biology, medicine and computing.
This paper examines the human body in art contexts where biotechnology plays a relevant role in the generation of new conceptualizations around the human body topic. Thus, re-contextualized in social and cultural spheres and technical terms, the body will become redesigned, revamped, or augmented through the use of technological advances ranging from plastic surgery to robotic prosthetics.
The human body is our vehicle of direct interaction with the environment. Its modification, alteration or expansion implies a redefinition of the existing limits between our corporality and the environment itself. Not only in the physical sense, but metaphysical and social. Hence, the introduced artists and strategies blur these limits and establish new relations through the body as a physical and social entity. In the search of new boundaries far beyond socio-cultural and natural limitations, they will reach new social, perceptual and conceptual statuses, far beyond aesthetic practices, focusing on the generation of political and social debates.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
(c) Rafael Ortiz Martinez de Carnero, 2023
Copyright
For all articles published in Artnodes that are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence, copyright is retained by the author(s). The complete text the license can be consulted at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s).
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary licences for the images that are subject to copyright.
Assignment of intellectual property rights
The author non exclusively transfers the rights to use (reproduce, distribute, publicly broadcast or transform) and market the work, in full or part, to the journal’s editors in all present and future formats and modalities, in all languages, for the lifetime of the work and worldwide.
I hereby declare that I am the original author of the work. The editors shall thus not be held responsible for any obligation or legal action that may derive from the work submitted in terms of violation of third parties’ rights, whether intellectual property, trade secret or any other right.
Rafael Ortiz Martinez de Carnero, Architect and Artist. Creative Director and Founder at O+R Studio
He is an architect, 2007, and director of O+R Studio, who is based in Shanghai and Seville since 2013. He has worked as Architect at Vito Acconci Studio in New York and as Project Manager at AS. Architecture-Studio at Shanghai. He holds a master of Science in Architecture from the Pratt Institute, New York, 2009 and an International Doctorate, from the University of Seville, 2017. His research focuses on the study of design strategies at the intersection between nature and technology and the impact they produce on society, the landscape and territory, from an interdisciplinary approach that encompasses art, architecture and urban design.
He has held individual and collective exhibitions in Seville (2023, 2021, 2018, 2007, 2006), Termoli (2023), Gimpo (2023), Cádiz (2018), Shanghai (2013, 2012), Toledo (2011), and New York (2009). Parallel to the activity of his studio, he has been programme leader and lecturer for the University of Derby (U.K) in China and professor at the Raffles Design Institute (Singapore) in China, the University of New Haven (U.S.A) and the University of Seville, in Spain. He was also a speaker at the Institute for the Study of International Expositions (2022), Kyoto University of the Arts (2022), University Institute of Lisbon (2021), University of Seville (2020, 2017), Leibniz Universität Hannover (2020), Shanghai Architects Fair (2014), and the Southeast University (2013).
Andrieu, Bernard. “Embodying the Chimera: Biotechnology and Subjectivity”. In: Eduardo Kac (ed.). Signs of Life: Bio Art and Beyond, (2007): 57-68. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Armstrong, Rachel. “What is Sci-Fi Aesthetics?”. In: Rachel Armstrong (ed.). Art & Design Magazine: Sci-Fi Aesthetics, (1998): 2-5. London: Academy Editions Ltd.
Barber, Tiffany E. “Cyborg Grammar? Reading Wangechi Mutu´s Non je ne regrette rien through Kindred”. In: Reynaldo Anderson and Charles E. Jones (eds.). Afrofuturism 2.0: The Rise of Astro-Blackness, (2016): 3-26. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Cartwright, Lisa and Brian Goldfarb. “On the Subject of Neural and Sensory Prostheses.” In: Marquard Smith and Joanne Morra (eds.). The Prosthetic Impulse: From a Posthuman Present to a Biocultural Future, (2006): 125-54. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Clynes, Manfred and Nathan S. Kline. “Cyborgs and Space”. Astronautics, (1960, September): 26-27, 74-76.
Deitch, Jeffrey. “Post Human, 1992”. In: Dan Byrne-Smith (ed.). Science Fiction. Whitechapel: Documents of Contemporary Art, (2020): 167-74. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Ferrando, Francesca. “A Feminist Genealogy of Posthuman Aesthetics in the Visual Arts”. In: Dan Byrne-Smith (ed.). Science Fiction. Whitechapel: Documents of Contemporary Art, (2020): 180-82. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.11
Goodall, Jane. “The Will to Evolve.” In: Marquad Smith (ed.). Stelarc: The Monograph, (2005): 1-32. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Haraway, Donna. A Cyborg Manifesto, 1985. In: Jeffrey Katsner (ed.). Nature. Whitechapel: Documents of Contemporary Art, (2012): 124-29. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001
Lemoine-Luccioni, Eugenie. La Robe. Essai psychanalytique sur le vêtement. Paris: Seuil, 1983, 95.
McQueen, Alexander. Alexander McQueen: Savage Beauty. In: Andrew Bolton (ed.). (2011): 211. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Modern Art. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Moulin, Anne Marie. “El Cuerpo frente a la Medicina.” In: Jean-Jacques Courtine, et al. (eds.). Historia del Cuerpo. Volumen 3: Las Mutaciones de la Mirada. El Siglo XX, (2006): 29-88. Madrid: Taurus.
Orlan. “Manifesto of Carnal Art”. Orlan, (n.d.). [Accessed: 5 May 2016]. https://www.orlan.eu/texts/
Pelbart, Peter Pál. “Life and Death in the Context of Biopolitical Domination, 2014.” In: Dan Byrne-Smith (ed.). Health. Whitechapel: Documents of Contemporary Art, (2020): 192-99. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Smith, Marquard. “The Vulnerable Articulate: James Gillingham, Aimee Mullins, and Matthew Barney.” In: Marquard Smith and Joanne Morra (eds.). The Prosthetic Impulse: From a Posthuman Present to a Biocultural Future, (2006): 43-72. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Smith, Marquard, and Joanne Morra. “Introduction.” In: Marquard Smith and Joanne Morra (eds.). The Prosthetic Impulse: From a Posthuman Present to a Biocultural Future, (2006): 1-14. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Soláns, Piedad. Arte Hoy - Accionismo Vienés, Fourth Cover. San Sebastián: Nerea, 2000.
Stelarc, and Marquard Smith. “Animating Bodies, Mobilizing Technologies: Stelarc in conversation.” In: Marquard Smith (ed.). Stelarc: The Monograph, (2005): 215-46. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Stelarc. “Parasite Visions: Alternate, intimate and involuntary experiences.” In: Rachel Armstrong (ed.). Art & Design Magazine: Sci-Fi Aesthetics, (1998): 66-69. London: Academy Editions Ltd.
subRosa. “Common Knowledge and Political Love.” In: Beatriz Da Costa and Kavita Philip (eds.). Tactical Biopolitics: Art, Activism, and Technoscience, (2008); 221-42. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7494.003.0023
Similar Articles
- Pedro Ortuño-Mengual, Gloria Lapeña-Gallego, Walls as documents for remembering in the face of censorship. Case study: The Des/Aparicions project by Antoni Muntadas , Artnodes: No. 23: (January 2019). NODE 23. Media Archaeology II / Digital Humanities II (Editor: Ana Rodriguez Granell)
- Slavko Kacunko, Immediation , Artnodes: No. 21: (June 2018). NODE 21. Media Archaeology (Editors: Pau Alsina, Ana Rodríguez, Vanina Hofman)
- Claudia Arozqueta, Polysemous light: light as a contradictory material in Rafael Lozano-Hemmer’s work , Artnodes: No. 21: (June 2018). NODE 21. Media Archaeology (Editors: Pau Alsina, Ana Rodríguez, Vanina Hofman)
- Pau Alsina, The Material Imagination, or Ten Years of Artnodes , Artnodes: No. 12: (November 2012). NODE 12. Materiality (Editor: Pau Alsina)
- Federica Matelli, The Everyday in Contemporary Art Practices: Towards a Speculative Poetic Regime. The Case of Nicolás Lamas , Artnodes: No. 16: (November 2015). NODE 16. Art Matters II (Editor: Ana Rodríguez Granell)
- Augusto Zubiaga, Lourdes Cilleruelo, Games of emulation: Ideological framework for an electronic neural architecture of biological inspiration , Artnodes: No. 25: (January 2020). NODE 25. Dialogs Between Art and Fundamental Science (Guest Editors: M. Bello & A. Gracie)
- Sara Coleman, Traversing the Net. Art, Textiles and digital technology , Artnodes: No. 30
- Emma Brasó, Fiction and authenticity beyond the artist’s body , Artnodes: No. 19: (June 2017). NODE 19. Art and speculative futures (coord.: Ana Rodriguez Granell)
- Josephine Berry, Bare Code: Net Art and the Free Software Movement , Artnodes: No. 3 (2004): NODE 3. Heterotipies
- Boris Groys, On the New , Artnodes: No. 2 (2003): NODE 2. Art and New Media
<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.