Artistic research within a lab of possibilities: exploring post-digital ignorance in “a’21 amberNetworkFestival”

Main Article Content

Ebru Yetişkin
İsmail Yiğit
Didem Ermiş

During COVID-19, the emergence of collective knowledge production networking, the development of common resource pools and resilient commoning practices were thoroughly weakened. In addition, such a paradigmatic crisis has made ignorance and its consequences more visible on a planetary scale. In this article, we asked what kind of research would enable us to explore the possibilities of co-learning and critically reflect on the various forms of ignorance production for the purposes of commoning in a range of settings. Based on laboratory studies in Science, Technology and Society (STS), we aim to explore the contemporary interventions of community building and commoning practices performed in artistic research. Becoming powerful creative forces in their own right, art and technology festivals have augmented the possibilities of how various actors relate to each other, express themselves to wider society, and self-organize in order to challenge current problems on a planetary scale. Our ethnographic study, which included interviews, document analysis, participant observations, case study, game design and online focus group meetings, was based on a hybrid mode of artistic research within a’21 amberNetworkFestival, a co-curated, decentralized and translocal art and technology festival. As a self-reflexive research outcome, the findings of our study reveal that artistic research merging scientific study, online applications, gamification, and performance can be developed for the examination of ignorance production and enhance translocal commoning, co-production and co-learning in various settings. Thus, artistic research within “a lab of possibilities” can allow different communities to collaborate on a common task by providing coordination without consensus.

Keywords
artistic research, art and technology, STS, laboratory, ignorance, collaborative learning

Article Details

How to Cite
Yetişkin, Ebru et al. “Artistic research within a lab of possibilities: exploring post-digital ignorance in ‘a’21 amberNetworkFestival’”. Artnodes, 2022, no. 30, pp. 1-10, doi:10.7238/artnodes.v0i30.399595.
Author Biographies

Ebru Yetişkin, Istanbul Technical University

Born in Turkey in 1976, she is an associate professor, a sociologist, and an independent curator. Her works are focused on co-producing transdisciplinary and experimental research in science, technology, politics, and arts. Since 2003, she has been a full-time researcher at Istanbul Technical University. Having studied Radio-TV-Cinema at Istanbul University, she completed her master’s in Science, Technology, Society (STS) at Louis Pasteur University and Istanbul Technical University. She received her doctorate degree in sociology in Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University. Her curatorial research includes exhibitions such as Cacophony (2013), Code Unknown (2014), and Waves (2015), and public seminar series, such as Contagious Bodies, Contemporary Art: Yet Another and STS Talks. Among her international (co)curatorial works, there are Dystopia Sound Art Festival / Berlin (2018), a'21 amberNetworkFestival, and Entre’acte (2022) in Belgrade.  In 2020, she was selected a board member of the Association of International Art Critics (AICA) in Turkey. She is also a founding member of IstanbuLab: Science, Technology and Society (STS) Platform in Istanbul; and FEMeeting - Women in Art, Science and Technology.

Her academic publications can be accessed at the following web address:

https://istanbultek.academia.edu/akademiituedutryetiskinYayC4B1nlar.

İsmail Yiğit, Istanbul Technical University

Born in Turkey in 1982, he is currently a graduate student of Science, Technology and Society Studies (STS) Master’s Program at Istanbul Technical University, as well as an undergraduate student at the Design of Visual Communication Department at Anatolian University and the Computer Programming Department at Istanbul University via distance learning. He graduated from the Electrical-Electronics Engineering Department at Bilkent University in 2005 and from the Turkish Literature and Philosophy Departments at Anatolian University in 2019 and in 2022 respectively via distance learning. He has worked as an Information Technology and Security Specialist at the Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency of Turkey since 2005. His main areas of interests are science fiction, design fiction, creative coding, and AI art. His sci-fi stories won awards from the Turkish Association of Information Technologies (TBD) in 2016 and the Turkish Foundation of Fantasy and Science Fiction Artists (FABISAD) in 2017. He participated in the anthology of sci-fi stories published by Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality in 2022. He writes reviews of sci-fi books and films periodically on the Turkish Sci-Fi Club web portal.

Didem Ermiş, Istanbul Technical University

Born in Turkey in 1992, she is a research assistant in the Department of Art and Culture Management at Istanbul Aydın University. She continues her doctorate education in the Art History Department of Istanbul Technical University. Having studied Art Management at Yeditepe University, she completed her master’s in the Department of Cultural Management at Istanbul Bilgi University. She has worked voluntarily with different organizations, including the Turkcell Dialogue Museum in Istanbul. In addition, she has worked as a project coordinator on various projects. She has also written exhibition reviews in online and printed publications and conducted interviews with professionals in the field of culture and arts. Among her academic studies, there are symposiums in which she participated by writing proceedings. These are the Graduate Students Art and Design Symposium (2020), Young Researchers Cultural Policy and Cultural Diplomacy Conference (2020), and ISARC International Women’s Studies Congress (2021). Moreover, she attended the 2021 edition of the amber network festival entitled Techno- Utopia x Post Digital Ignorance by presenting her research titled A Technofeminist Perspective to Vaccine Hesitancy.

References

A’21 amberNetworkFestival. Techno-Utopia x Post-Digital Ignorance. n.d. “About.” [Accessed: May 29, 2021]. https://ambernetworkfestival.org/en/about.

Al Dahdah, Marine, Jean-Benoit Falisse and Gregorie Lurton. “Ignorance et santé globale: Stratégies et acteurs de la réponse à la Covid-19 dans des pays dits des Suds”. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, vol. 15, no. 04 (2021). https://journals.openedition.org/rac/25605.

Amsterdamska, Olga. “II Practices, People, and Places”. In: Ulrike Felt, Ravyon Fouche, Clark A. Miller, Laurel Smith-Doerr (eds.). The Handbook of Science and Technology, (2007): 205-210. Cambridge and London: MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262035682.

Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: NC: Duke University Press, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq.

Barad, Karen. “On touching: The inhuman that therefore I am”. Differences, vol. 23, no. 3 (2012): 206-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1892943.

Bippus, Elke. “Artistic Experiments as Research”. In: Michael Schwab (ed.). Experimental Systems. Future Knowledge in Artistic Research, (2013), 121-134. Leuven: Leuven University Press. ISBN: 978-9058679734.

Borgdorff, Henk. “Where are we today? The State of the Art in Artistic Research”. Research and Criticism: Reviewing Artistic Research, (2010): 17-31. https://www.researchcatalogue.net/profile/show-work?work=129658.

Bubaš, Goran and Antonia Čižmešija. “An instrument for evaluation of the use of the web conferencing system BigBlueButton”. Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems, (2020): 63-71. Varazdin: Faculty of Organization and Informatics. ISSN: 1848- 2295.

Busch, Kathrin. “Artistic Research and the Poetics of Knowledge.” Art & Research: A Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods, vol. 2, no. 2 (2009): 1-7. https://laboratory.culturalinquiry.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/art-and-research.pdf.

Felt, Ulrike, Ravyon Fouche, Clark A. Miller and Laurel Smith-Doerr. “Introduction to the Fourth Edition of The Handbook of Science and Technology”. In: Ulrike Felt, Ravyon Fouche, Clark A. Miller, Laurel Smith-Doerr (eds.). The Handbook of Science and Technology, (2017): 1-26. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262035682.

Frickel, Scott. “Not Here and Everywhere: The Non-production of Scientific Knowledge”. In: Daniel Lee Kleinman and Kelly Moore (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Science, Technology, and Society, (2014): 263-276. New York: Routledge. ISBN: 9780367335939.

Fortaleza, Carlos Magno Castelo Branco. “Evidence, rationality, and ignorance: Agnotological issues in COVID-19 science”. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, no. 53 (2020): 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0475-2020.

Gabrys, Jennifer and Kathryn Yusoff. “Arts, Sciences and Climate Change: Practices and Politics at the Threshold”. Science as Culture, vol. 21, no. 1 (2011): 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2010.550139.

Halpern, Megan K. “Across the great divide: Boundaries and boundary objects in art and science”. Public Understanding of Science, vol. 21, no. 08 (2012): 924-925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510394040.

Haraway, Donna. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies, vol. 14. no. 03 (1988): 575–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.

—. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1991. ISBN 9780415903875.

—. Modest Witness Second Millennium. Femaleman Meets Omncomouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004349615837.

—. When species meet. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 2008. ISBN 978-0-8166-5046-0.

Hashimi, Zahra Ibrahim. “Big Blue Button for E-learning: The Effect of Privacy and Support Quality”. International Journal of Engineering Applied Science and Technology, vol. 5, no. 03 (2020): 59-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33564/IJEAST.2020.v05i03.010.

Jasanoff, Sheila. “Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society”. In: Sheila Jasanoff (ed.). States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, (2044). London, England: Routledge. ISBN: 9780415403290.

Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on The Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. New York: Pergamon, 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-09537-3.

—. “Laboratory Studies: The Cultural Approach to the Study of Science”. In: Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Peterson & Trevor Pinch (eds.). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, (1995): 140-66. California: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412990127.n7.

—. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999. ISBN: 9780674258945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674039681.

Kräftner, Bernd, Judith Kroell, Gerhard Ramsebner, Leo Peschta and Isabel Warner. “A Pillow Squirrel and Its Habitat: Patients, a Syndrome, and Their Dwelling(s)”. In: Michael Schillmeier and Miquel Domenech (eds.). New Technologies and Emerging Spaces of Care, (2010): 169-195. Burlington: Ashgate. ISBN: 9781315598130.

Latour, Bruno and Steve Woolgar. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University, 1986. ISBN: 9780691028323. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820412.

Latour, Bruno and Peter Weibel (eds.). Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Karlsruhe: ZKM, Centre for Art and Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006. ISBN: 9780262122795.

Lynch, Michael. Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. New York: Routledge, 2017. ISBN: 9781138085534.

Mäkelä Maarit, Nithikul Nimkulrat, D. P. Dash and Francois-X. Nsenga. “On reflecting and making in artistic research”. Journal of Research Practice, vol. 07, no. 1 (2011): 1-12. https://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/280.

McNiff, Shaun. “Opportunities and Challenges in Arts-Based Research”. Shaun McNiff (ed.). Art as Research: Opportunities and Challenges, (20113): 3-9. Bristol and Chicago: Intellect. ISBN: 978-1783200016 https://doi.org/10.1386/9781783200016_3.

Osterman, Petar. “Video conference as a tool for enhancing student collaboration”. Polytechnic and design, vol. 4 no. 4 (2016): 395-402. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/258009.

Paul, Katharina T. and Christina Haddad. “The Pandemic As We Know It: a policy studiesperspective on ignroance and nonknowledge in COVID- 19 governance”. In: Matthias Gross and Linsey McGoey (eds.). Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies, (2022): 221-233. London and New York: Routledge. ISBN-13: 978-0415718967 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003100607-25.

Proctor, Robert N. “Agnotology: A Missing Term to Describe the Cultural Production of Ignorance (and Its Study)”. In: Robert N. Proctor and Londa Schiebinger (eds.). Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance, (2008): 1-33. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. ISBN-13: 978-0804759014.

Salecl, Renata. “Big data: big ignorance”. In: Aleš Završnik (ed.). Big Data, crime and social control, (2017): 58-74. London and New York: Routledge. 58-74. ISBN: 9780367227562. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315395784-3.

Salter, Chris, Regula Valérie Burri and Joseph Dumit. “Art, Design, and Performance”. In: Ulrike Felt, Ravyon Fouche, Clark A. Miller, Laurel Smith-Doerr (eds.). The Handbook of Science and Technology, (2017): 139-167. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262035682.

Schindler, Johanna. “Negotiation, Translation, Synchronization? The Role of Boundary Objects in Artistic Research 1”. In: Henk Borgdorff, Peter Peters and Trevor Pinch (eds.). Dialogues Between Artistic Research and Science and Technology Studies, (2019): 103-116. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429438875-8.

Smith, Marquard. “Introduction, What Is Research in the Visual Arts? Obsession, Archive, Encounter”. In: Michael Ann Holly and Marquard Smith (eds.). What Is Research in the Visual Arts? Obsession, Archive, Encounter, (2008): x–xxvi. Williamstown, MA: Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute and Yale University Press. ISBN-13: 978-0300134131.

Star, Susan Leigh and James R. Griesemer. “Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology”. Social studies of science, no. 19, vol. 03 (1989): 412- 413. https://www.jstor.org/stable/285080.

Timmermann, Cristian. “Epistemic Ignorance, Poverty and the COVID- 19 Pandemic”. Asian Bioethic Review, vol. 12, no. 4 (2020): 519- 527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-020-00140-4.

Vansina, Leopold. “Psychodynamics: a field of study and an approach”. In: Marie-Jeanne Vansina-Cobbaert and Leopold S. Vansina (eds.). Psychodynamics for Consultants and Managers: From Understanding to Leading Meaningful Change, (2008): 108-155. London, England: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470697184.ch6.

Wodiczko, Krzysztof. “Interview with C. Ondine Chavoya”. In: Gregor Sholette and Nato Thompson (eds.). The Interventionists: User’Manual for the Creative Distruption of Everyday Life, (2004): 27-28. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

Yetişkin, Ebru. “Paratactic commoning: collective knowledge production networking as political struggle”. Popular Communication, no. 18, vol. 03 (2020): 216-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2020.1781860.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.