Machinima, post-photography and post-animation: a comparative disciplinary study

Main Article Content

José María Alonso Calero

This research proposes a convergence between the field of machinima, post-photography and post-animation, which are distant disciplines but related through factors and key points since they were developed in the context of the internet. Based on the intermediary role between disciplines played by machinima, and drawing on the qualitative methodology for case studies from theoretical triangulation, we suggest a comparative study whose hypothesis proposes a sequence formed by post-photography, machinima and post-animation until it reaches real-time animation. Having established the key principles on authorship, automatization and appropriation (where mediation and self-reference are determining factors) in “Por un manifiesto post-fotográfico”, we will extract a series of “post” key factors to guide us in the analysis of these disciplines in order to generate a cross taxonomy. This taxonomy will aim to highlight the importance of machinima in relation to the most advanced animation and connect it with real-time animation. All of this has the objective of reflecting on the consideration of real-time animation as post-animation, which primarily involves pointing out the parallels between these disciplines as established in audiovisual creation, and then presupposing a convergence between media fostered by a possible “post” condition. The result is a series of “post” key factors A and B; a cross taxonomy with which we try to understand how the implementation of hybrid languages creates interdisciplinary correspondence.

Keywords
post-photography, machinima, remediation, post-animation, real-time animation

Article Details

How to Cite
Alonso Calero, José María. “Machinima, post-photography and post-animation: a comparative disciplinary study”. Artnodes, no. 30, pp. 1-11, doi:10.7238/artnodes.v0i30.393949.
Author Biography

José María Alonso Calero, Dept. of Art and Architecture. Fine Arts Faculty. University of Malaga

Teacher and researcher in Fine Arts. Doctoral thesis: El flujo de la escena en la interacción física: participación, virtualidad y presencia. He has combined his teaching work with the management and organization of scientific events relating to the hybridization of artistic and creative languages. His research activity is carried out in the field of interdisciplinary artistic creation. He delivers doctoral courses in Audiovisual Communication. Research grantee in a virtual reality group in the department of Computer Architecture before entering the professional world of the audiovisual sector. He undertakes various artistic projects set against the backdrop of relating art to new media, highlighting projects of interaction, relational art and territory, and so on. IP of projects such as Design transfer map, Bürohack. Bureaucratic Experience by UX, SCENUX Prototype: a tool for register via the gamification of the user experience in creation and reception, or LIMBO Space Social Sound XD.

References

Ardèvol, Elisenda, Estalella, Adolfo, Domínguez, Daniel. «La mediación tecnológica en la práctica etnográfica». XI Congreso de Antropología de la Faaee, Donostia, Ankulegi Antropologia Elkartea (2008). http://www.ankulegi.org.

Baigorri, Laura. «Recapitulando: modelos de artivismo (1994-2003)». Artnodes: revista de arte, ciencia y tecnología, no. 3 (2004). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i3.692.

Baigorri, Laura. «Game art. Nuevas interfaces para el arte y el juego». Revista KEPES, no. 6 (2010): 151-65. https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/485/410.

Bolter, Jay David. Writing Space. Computers, Hypertext, and the Remediation of Print. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600110.

Bolter, Jay David, Grusin, Richard. Remediation. Understanding New Media. Cambridge: MiT Press, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij.1999.4.4.208.1

Brea, José Luis. La era postmedia. Salamanca: Centro de Arte de Salamanca, 2002.

Callon, Michael. «Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay». En: Power, action and Belief: a New sociology of Knowledge?, J. Law (ed.) no. 32 (1986):196-223. Londres: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x.

Dellario, Frank R. «The future of machinima as a professional animation resource and its growth as real-time animation in virtual Worlds». Journal of Visual Culture vol. 10, no. 1 (2011): 89-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412910391572.

Fontcuberta, Joan. «Por un manifiesto posfotográfico». Suplemento cultural de La Vanguardia (2011). https://www.lavanguardia.com/cultura/20110511/54152218372/por-un-manifiesto-posfotografico.html.

Fontcuberta, Joan. 2016. La furia de las imágenes. Notas sobre la postfotografía. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg. www.conlicencia.com.

García Sedano, Marcelino. «Una revisión del concepto de postfotografía. Imágenes contra el poder desde la red». Liño, no. 21 (2015): 125-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17811/li.21.2015.125-132.

Brea, José Luis. La era postmedia. Acción comunicativa, prácticas (post)artísticas y dispositivos neomediales. Guasch, Anna Maria (ed.). Salamanca: Editorial CASA, 2002.

Harwood, Tracy. «Cocurated Digital Culture. Machinima». Methods, vol. 52, no. 2 (2019): 123-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_01328.

Harwood, Tracy, Garry, Tony, Uwins, Mike. «Machinima: Extending brand reach». Journal of Consumer Behaviour, vol. 14, no. 6 (2015): 378-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1552.

Jenkins, Henry. Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. Nueva York: New York University Press, 2008.

Jenkins, Henry. «DIY Media 2010: Video and Gaming Culture (Part Three)». Henry Jenkins. CONFESSIONS OF AN ACA-FAN (2011). http://henryjenkins.org/2011/01/your_curators_statement_sets_u.html.

Jiménez, Enrique, Ma, Ana, Barrio Fraile, Estrella. «Guía para implementar el método de estudio de caso en proyectos de investigación». En: Propuestas de investigación en áreas de vanguardia (2018): 159-68. Madrid Forum XXI. Editorial Tecnos (grupo Anaya). https://ddd.uab.cat/record/196118.

Latour, Bruno. «On technical mediation-philosophy, sociology, genealogy». Common Knowledge, vol. 3, no. 2 (1994): 29-64.

Lowood, Henry. «High-performance play: The making of machinima». Journal of Media Practice, vol. 7, no. 1 (2006): 59-79. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmpr.7.1.25/1.

Manetas, Miltos. «Manifesto of Art After Videogames». Cargo Collective (1997). http://cargocollective.com/manetas/AFTER-VIDEOGAMES/ART-FROM-VIDEOGAMES.

Martín Prada, Juan. «Mediación estética y pragmática del saber artístico». En: Arte y Saber. Ars Sapiens, Actas Seminario, Juan Luis Moraza (ed.) no. 29 (2003) 1-41 (31). Arteleku.

Matteo, Bittanti. «Game Art. (This is not) A Manifesto. (This is) A Disclaimer». En: Gamescenes: Art in the Age of Videogames, Matteo Bittanti y Domenico Quaranta (eds.) (2009): 7-14. Monza: Johan & Levi Editore.

Montero, Valentina. «“Nuevos medios”: una etiqueta que embejece velozmente». En: Bifurcaciones de lo sensible: cine, arte y nuevos medios, Adolfo Vera Peñaloza y Sergio Navarro Mayorga (eds.) (2018): 193-208. RIL Editores.

Negri, Toni. Arte y multitud: ocho cartas. Madrid; Trotta, 2000. https://www.trotta.es/libros/arte-y-multitudo/9788498796216/.

Nord, James. «The “Rear-View Mirror” Approach». CALICO Journal, vol. 4, no. 3 (2013): 67-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v4i3.67-77.

Picard, Martin. «Machinima. Video Game As An Art Form?» En: Proceedings of {CGSA} 2006 Symposium, 2006.

Roncoroni Osio, Umberto Luigi. «View of Notes on art overproduction, post-photography and the digital». Artnodes, no. 14 (2014). https://raco.cat/index.php/Artnodes/article/view/n14-roncoroni/392977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i14.2255.

Ronfard, Rémi. «Film Directing for Computer Games and Animation». Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 40, no. 2 (2021): 713-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.142663.

Toro-Peralta, Kevin A., Adolfo L. Grisales-Vargas. «Postfotografía: de la imagen del mundo al mundo de las imágenes». Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, vol. 33, no. 3 (2021): 899-916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/aris.70435.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.