On Altpedias: partisan epistemics in the encyclopaedias of alternative facts

Main Article Content

Emillie V de Keulenaar
Marc Tuters
Ivan Kisjes
Kaspar Beelen

This article considers how online alternative encyclopaedias, or ‘Altpedias’, create and maintain their own universes of “alternative facts”. We consider a selection of Altpedias that reject Wikipedia’s celebrated ‘neutral point of view’ as an artefact of liberal consensus politics whilst regarding their own epistemics as inherently partisan. As opposed to disregarding objectivity or truth, Altpedias’ ‘alternative facts’ may thus be understood as the product of competing normative standpoints concerning the use value of knowledge. In competing with Wikipedia, Altpedias ultimately attempt to give their partisan viewpoints universal standards, both in tone and in their very nature as wiki platforms. Empirically, the article uses visual network analysis and natural language processing in order to represent the vernacular worldviews of several far- and extreme-right Altpedias: Metapedia, Infogalactic and Rightpedia. Theoretically, the article frames these Altpedias’ fractious approach to the study of knowledge in relation to Lyotard’s 'general agonistic’ and his speculations concerning the impact of computation on epistemics in the postmodern condition.

Keywords
Altpedias; post-truth; postmodernism; Lyotard; far right; general agonistics; epistemic rupture

Article Details

How to Cite
de Keulenaar, Emillie V et al. “On Altpedias: partisan epistemics in the encyclopaedias of alternative facts”. Artnodes, no. 24, pp. 22-33, doi:10.7238/a.v0i24.3295.
Author Biographies

Emillie V de Keulenaar, University of Amsterdam

Junior researcher at the University of Amsterdam and the Open Intelligence Lab. At  OILab, she specialises in the cross-platform dissemination of far-right political thought.  She holds a MA in History of Political Thought and Intellectual History from University College London and an rMA in Media Studies (New Media and Digital Culture).

Marc Tuters, University of Amsterdam

Researcher affiliated with the Digital Methods Initiative (DMI) and the director of the Open Intelligence Lab (OILab). His previous research focused on media art the built environment for which he developed the concept of 'locative media'. His current research focuses on how online subcultures constitute themselves as political movements.

Ivan Kisjes, University of Amsterdam

Ivan Kisjes is part of the technical research support team for the Humanities at the University of Amsterdam. He is part of the ACHI-CREATE research team there, and hence closely involved in the Amsterdam Time machine. Though trained as an archaeologist, he has been working in the fields of linguistics, musicology, history, theatre studies, cinema history and art history as a part of this team.

Kaspar Beelen, The Alan Turing Institute

Kaspar Beelen currently works as a Research Associate for the "Living with Machines" project at the Alan Turing institute. Previously he was an Assistant Professor in Digital Humanities at the University of Amsterdam. After completing his Ph.D. at the University of Antwerp (under the supervision of Marnix Beyen), he worked on the Digging into Linked Parliamentary Data Project at the University of Toronto and the University of Amsterdam. As researcher for CREATE he focuses on computational history, more specifically on the use of text-mining for political and cultural history. His main areas of interest include: gender and politics, the history of political representation and the evolution of affective discourse.

References
Cusset, François. 2008. French Theory: How Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, & Co. Transformed the Intellectual Life of the United States. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Deneen, Patrick J. 2018. Why Liberalism Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300223446.001.0001

Farkas, Johan and Jannick Schou. 2018. “Fake News as a Floating Signifier: Hegemony, Antagonism and the Politics of Falsehood.” Javnost - The Public Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture. Volume 25, Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1463047

Infogalactic. 2018a. “Infogalactic: Editors’ guidelines,
Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core”. https://infogalactic.co/info/Infogalactic:Editors%27_guidelines [Accessed: 28 October 2018]

Infogalactic. 2018b. “Infogalactic: Introduction, Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core”. https://infogalactic.com/info/Infogalactic:Introduction [Accessed: 28 October 2018]

Infogalactic 2019a. “Infogalactic: Statistics, Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core”. https://infogalactic.com/info/Special:Statistics [Accessed: 15 March 2019]

Johnson, B. 2007. “Rightwing website challenges ‘liberal bias’ of Wikipedia”. The Guardian, 1 March. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2007/mar/01/wikipedia.news [Accessed: 26 May 2019]

Kakutani, Michiko. 2018. The Death of Truth. New York: Harper Collins.

Kelly, Kevin. 2016. The Inevitable: Understanding the 12 Technological Forces That Will Shape Our Future. New York: Penguin.

Kessler, Jason S. 2017. “Scattertext: a Browser-Based Tool for Visualizing how Corpora Differ”. ACL System Demonstrations. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-4015

de Keulenaar, E. V. et al. (2018) Mapping Multiverse Alternative Facts In the Age of Post-truth. Research project report. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. Available at: https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/SummerSchool2018MappingMultiverseAlternativeFacts (Accessed: 3 July 2019).

Kreiss, D., M. Finn and Fred Turner. 2011. “The Limits of Peer Production: Some Reminders From Max Weber for the Network Society”. New Media & Society 13 (2): 243–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810370951

Leshnick, A. and Livio, O. 2016. “Technology Meets Postmodern Epistemology: The Discourse of Hebrew Wikipedia Deletion Pages”. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, 6(0). https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/spir/article/view/8996 [Accessed: 26 May 2019]

Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1979. La condition postmoderne: rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Editions de Minuit.

Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: a Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Marwick, Alice, and Rebecca Lewis. 2017. “Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online.” Data & Society. New York. https://datasociety.net/pubs/oh/DataAndSociety_MediaManipulationAndDisinformationOnline.pdf [Accessed: 28 October 2018]

McIntyre, Lee C. 2018. Post-Truth: MIT's Essential Knowledge Series. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Metapedia. 2018a. “Metapedia: Mission statement,
Metapedia”. https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Metapedia:Mission_statement [Accessed: 28 October 2018]

Metapedia. 2018b. “Wikipedia, Metapedia”. https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia [Accessed: 28 October 2018]

Metapedia. 2019a. “Metapedia:Statistics, Metapedia”.
https://infogalactic.com/info/Special:Statistics [Accessed: 15 March 2019]

Metapedia. 2019b. “The Holocaust, Metapedia”. https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust [Accessed: 15 March 2019]

Mikolov, Tomas; Kai Chen, Gregory S. Corrado, and Jeffrey A. Dean. 2015. “Computing numeric representations of words in a high-dimensional space”. United States US9037464B1, filed 15 March 2013, and issued 19 May 2015. https://patents.google.com/patent/US9037464B1/en.

Mouffe, Chantal. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. New York: Verso.

Rightpedia. 2018a. “Metapedia, metapedia.org”. https://en.rightpedia.info/w/Metapedia.

Rightpedia. 2018b. “Rightpedia, Rightpedia”. https://en.rightpedia.info/w/Rightpedia [Accessed: 28 October 2018]

Robertson, T. D. 2013. “The Postmodern Shift in Library Instruction”. Faculty Publications, (10): 1-20.

Rodríguez, R. R. 2008. “Liberating Epistemology: Wikipedia and the Social Construction of Knowledge”. Religious Studies and Theology, 26(2): 173–201. https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.v26i2.173

Roose, K. 2018. “The Alt-Right Created a Parallel Internet. It’s an Unholy Mess”. The New York Times, 20 January. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/11/technology/alt-right-internet.html [Accessed: 26 May 2019]

Sobel Fitts, A. 2017. “Welcome to the Wikipedia of the Alt-Right”. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/welcome-to-the-wikipedia-of-the-alt-right/ [Accessed: 26 May 2019]
Wikipedia. 2016. “User talk: Sombe19, Wikipedia”. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sombe19&oldid=703042798 [Accessed: 28 October 2018]

Wikipedia. 2018a. “Talk: Race and intelligence, Wikipedia”. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Race_and_intelligence&oldid=862071859 [Accessed: 28 October 2018]

Wikipedia. 2018b. “Wikipedia: About, Wikipedia”. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:About&oldid=862617544 [Accessed: 28 October 2018]

Wikipedia. 2018c. “Wikipedia: Fringe theories, Wikipedia”. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Fringe_theories&oldid=864018913 [Accessed: 28 October 2018]

Wikipedia. 2018d. “Wikipedia:Introduction, Wikipedia”. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Introduction&oldid=861666306 [Accessed: 28 October 2018]

Wikipedia. 2018e. “Wikipedia: Manual of Style, Wikipedia”. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style&oldid=865981977 [Accessed: 28 October 2018]

Wikipedia 2018f. “Wikipedia: Purpose, Wikipedia”. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Purpose&oldid=862996624 [Accessed: 28 October 2018]

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.