Ask not what AI can do for art... but what art can do for AI

Main Article Content

Meredith Tromble

What can art do for artificial intelligence? This essay circles around this question from a viewpoint grounded in the embodied knowledge base of contemporary art. The author employs the term “feelthink” to refer to the shifting webs of perception, emotion, thought, and action probed by artists engaging AI. Tracing several metaphors used by artists to consider AI, the author identifies points where the metaphors delaminate, pulling away from the phenomena to which they refer. The author advocates for these partial and imagistic understandings of AI as probes which, despite or because of their flaws, contribute important ideas for the development and cultural positioning of AI entities. The author further questions the limited scope of art ideas addressed in AI research and proposes a thought experiment in which art joins industry as a source of questions for developing artificial intelligences. In conclusion, the essay’s structuring metaphor is described as an example of “feelthink” at work.

Keywords
Art, artificial intelligence, A.I., embodiment, feelthink, metaphor

Article Details

How to Cite
Tromble, Meredith. “Ask not what AI can do for art. but what art can do for AI”. Artnodes, no. 26, pp. 1-9, doi:10.7238/a.v0i26.3368.
Author Biography

Meredith Tromble, San Francisco Art Institute

Meredith Tromble is an intermedia artist and writer. Her curiosity about the links between imagination and knowledge led her to collaborate with scientists in addition to making installations, drawings, and performances. Her work has been presented nationally and internationally, including a survey of her artwork from the past decade in the exhibition “Umwelt” at BioBAT Art Space in Brooklyn. She holds joint appointments as artist-in-residence at the Complexity Sciences Center and Visiting Scholar at the Feminist Research Institute at the University of California, Davis. She is the editor of two books, The Routledge Companion to Biology in Art and Architecture, co-edited with Charissa Terranova, and The Art and Films of Lynn Hershman, University of California Press. She is Professor of Interdisciplinary Studies/Art & Technology at the San Francisco Art Institute.

References
Atanasoski, Neda and Kalindi Vora. Surrogate Humanity: Race, Robots, and the Politics of Technological Futures. Durham: Duke University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478004455

Bongard, Joshua. “Manipulators and Manipulanda.” Edge. 2015. https://www.edge.org/response-detail/26106.

Bryson, Joanna J. “Robots Should Be Slaves.” In Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issues, ed. Yorick Wilks. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.8.11bry

Cañamero, Lola. “Emotions and Adaptation in Autonomous Agents: A Design Perspective.” Cybernetics and Systems, 32:5 (2001): 507-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969720120250.

Cheng, Ian. http://iancheng.com/.

Damasio, Antonio. Descarte’s Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Grossett/Putnam, 1994.

Ferree, Joel. “Rashaad Newsome’s ‘Being.’” LACMA Unframed. April 9, 2020. https://unframed.lacma.org/2019/09/11/rashaad-newsome%E2%80%99s-being.

Fort Mason Center. “Rashaad Newsome: To Be Real.” 2020. https://fortmason.org/event/newsome/.

Haraway, Donna. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2003.

iCub.org, http://www.icub.org.

IEEE. “Your Guide To The World of Robotics.” https://robots.ieee.org/robots/icub/.

Jablonka, Eva and Marion Lamb. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005.

Lewin, Sarah. “Going Interstellar: Q&A With Author Kim Stanley Robinson.” Space.com, 2015. https://www.space.com/29862-kim-stanley-robinson-aurora-interview.html.

López de Mántares, Ramón. “Artificial Intelligence and the Arts: Toward Computational Creativity.” In The Next Step: Exponential Life. Madrid: Turner Libros, 2017. https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/en/articles/artificial-intelligence-and-the-arts-toward-computational-creativity/.

Museum of Modern Art. https://www.moma.org/collection/works/202998.

Mukherjee, Ranu and Maggie Roberts. “If AI Were Cephalopod.” Orphan Drift Archive, 2019. http://www.orphandriftarchive.com/if-ai/if-ai-were-cephalopod/.

Newsome, Rashaad. https://rashaadnewsome.com/.

Prophet, Jane and Helen Pritchard. “Performative Apparatus and Diffractive Practices: An Account of Artificial Life Art.” Artificial Life, Vol. 21, No. 3: 332-343. https://doi.org/10.1162/ARTL_a_00174

Seeman, Axel, ed., New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind, and Social Neuroscience. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2012.

Smail, Daniel Lord. On Deep History and the Brain. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.

So, Veronica, Marc Palatucci, and Jesper D. Lund. “The Worldmaker and His Killjoy.” Office Magazine, August 8, 2017. http://officemagazine.net/interview/worldmaker-and-his-killjoy.

Solso, Robert. Cognition and the Visual Arts. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1994.

Wikiart. https://www.wikiart.org/en/marcel-duchamp/bicycle-wheel-1913.

Wikimedia. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fragonard,_The_Swing.jpg

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.