Identification, classification and control: close ties analysed in reference to artistic practices in the heart of artificial intelligence
Article Sidebar
Google Scholar citations
Main Article Content
Artificial intelligence (AI) is preceded by a history going all the way back to former efforts in creating beings with artificial movement and intelligence. The objective of this article is to highlight how, in this history, which includes the current developments in the fields of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), the tasks of surveillance and control through the identification and classification of people, things or events in the world, have been so central in the myths or theories on automatons, homunculi, androids, robots or cyborgs, as well as in the various attempts to make them a reality. It will be asserted, furthermore, that the wishes and efforts to imagine and create these beings are neither innocent nor circumstantial; rather, that to a large extent they come from a patriarchal vision of the world in which everything existing must be subjected to a surveillance that ensures control over that which is real. To achieve this, reference will be made on the one hand to histories which show the predominance of these tasks and the vision of the world hidden behind them, and, on the other, to artistic practices and aesthetic representations which have questioned the identifying and classifying operations of AI as a means of surveillance and control.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
(c) Hugo Felipe Idárraga, 2020
Copyright
For all articles published in Artnodes that are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence, copyright is retained by the author(s). The complete text the license can be consulted at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s).
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary licences for the images that are subject to copyright.
Assignment of intellectual property rights
The author non exclusively transfers the rights to use (reproduce, distribute, publicly broadcast or transform) and market the work, in full or part, to the journal’s editors in all present and future formats and modalities, in all languages, for the lifetime of the work and worldwide.
I hereby declare that I am the original author of the work. The editors shall thus not be held responsible for any obligation or legal action that may derive from the work submitted in terms of violation of third parties’ rights, whether intellectual property, trade secret or any other right.
Hugo Felipe Idárraga, University of Los Andes
Philosopher at the National University of Colombia, with a Master’s in Communication from the Pontifical Xavierian University. Interested in subjects relating to image theory, computer vision and artificial intelligence. He is currently studying the Master’s in Digital Humanities at the University of Los Andes.
Aristóteles. 2004. Política. Madrid: Gredos.
Benjamin, Ruha. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. 1.a ed. Nueva York: Polity.
Bunz, Mercedes. 2009. «Are Hewlett-Packard computers really racist?». The Guardian, December 23, https://www.theguardian.com/media/pda/2009/dec/23/hewlett-packard.
Brown, Steven T. 2008. «Machinic Desires: Hans Bellmer’s Dolls and the Technological Uncanny in Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence». Mechademia 3(1): 222-53. https://doi.org/10.1353/mec.0.0088.
Campolo, Alexander y Kate Crawford. 2020. «Enchanted Determinism: Power without Responsibility in Artificial Intelligence». Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 6(0): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2020.277.
Crawford, Kate. 2017. «The Trouble with Bias». Keynote lecture held at NIPS, Conference at Long Beach, California, December 4-9. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMym_BKWQzk
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1965. Alchemy and Artificial Intelligence. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3244.html.
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1972. What computers can't do: a critique of artificial reason. New York: Harper & Row.
Dzieza, Josh. 2020. «How hard will the robots make us work?». The Verge, February 27. https://www.theverge.com/2020/2/27/21155254/automation-robots-unemployment-jobs-vs-human-google-amazon
Edwards, Paul N. 1997. The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America. Cambridge, Mass. London: MIT Press Ltd.
Galison, Peter. 1994. «The Ontology of the Enemy: Norbert Wiener and the Cybernetic Vision». Critical Inquiry 21(1): 228-266.
Homero. 2010. Iliada. Madrid: MESTAS Ediciones.
Haraway, Donna Jeane. 2004. Testigo_Modesto@Segundo_Milenio.HombreHembra©_Conoce_Oncoratón®. Barcelona: Editorial UOC, S.L.
Klingemann, Mario. 2018. «Neural Glitch». Quasimondo. Accesado, March 2, 2020. http://underdestruction.com/2018/10/28/neural-glitch/
Nguyen, Anh, Jason Yosinski y Jeff Clune. 2015. «Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Images». arXiv:1412.1897 [cs], April. http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.1897.
MacColl, Le Roy Archibald. 1945. Fundamental Theory of Servomechanisms. 1.a ed. First Printing. D. Van Nostrand Company, inc.
McCorduck, Pamela. 2004. Machines Who Think: A Personal Inquiry into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence. 2.a ed. Natick, Mass: A K Peters/CRC Press.
?n??ha, Mimi. 2018. «How the Arts Help Us Understand Our Relationship With Technology», video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JJ6Oj_u-Qw.
Paglen, Trevor y Kate Crawford. 2019. «Excavating AI». https://www.excavating.ai.
Platón. 2011. La República o El Estado. Traducido por Patricio de Azcárate Corral. Madrid: Austral.
Raviv, Shaun. 2020. «The Secret History of Facial Recognition». Wired Magazine, January 21. https://www.wired.com/story/secret-history-facial-recognition/
Truitt, Elly R. 2015. Medieval Robots: Mechanism, Magic, Nature, and Art. Pennsylvania:University of
Pennsylvania Press. http://muse.jhu.edu/book/39875/.
Szegedy, Christian, Wojciech Zaremba, Ilya Sutskever, Joan Bruna, Dumitru Erhan, Ian Goodfellow y
Rob Fergus. 2014. «Intriguing properties of neural networks». arXiv:1312.6199 [cs], February. http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6199.
Similar Articles
- Edward Shanken, New Media, Art-Science, and Contemporary Art: Towards a Hybrid Discourse? , Artnodes: No. 11: (November 2011). NODE 11. Hybrid Discourses (coord.: Pau Alsina)
- Michael Naimark, Analysis of the last twenty-five years of digital art , Artnodes: No. 4: (July 2005). NODE 4. Calculability (Editor: Pau Alsina)
- Jesús Fernando Monreal Ramírez, Ana Del Castillo, Itineraries of Matter: Mediality, Circulation and Technological Obsolescence in Certain Artistic Practices from Mexico , Artnodes: No. 15: (June 2015). NODE 15. Art Matters I (Editors: Pau Alsina, Ana Rodríguez Granell)
- Pau Alsina, Mapping the interrelationships between art, science and technology for nearly ten years , Artnodes: No. 11: (November 2011). NODE 11. Hybrid Discourses (coord.: Pau Alsina)
- Pau Alsina, Debunking the myth of the immateriality of digital art: towards a neomaterialist focus on the arts , Artnodes: No. 14: (November 2014). NODE 14. New Feminist Materialism (Editor: Ana Rodríguez Granell)
- Fermín Soria Ibarra, Stresses, paradoxes, terminological debates, and some transformative possibilities within the educational turn framework in artistic and curation projects , Artnodes: No. 17: (June 2016). NODE 17. Art and Education (Editor: Aida Sánchez de Serdio)
- Pedro Luengo, Javier Luengo, Photogrammetry and light analysis. Interactions in the study of Baroque architecture , Artnodes: No. 23: (January 2019). NODE 23. Media Archaeology II / Digital Humanities II (Editor: Ana Rodriguez Granell)
- Tin Wilke, Summoning the ghosts of the AnArchive , Artnodes: No. 34: (July 2024). NODE 34. Materiology and variantology: invitation to dialogue (guest editors: Siegfried Zielinski & Daniel Irrgang)
- Laura Benítez Valero, Erich Berger, First Response , Artnodes: No. 27: (January 2021). Node 27. Arts in the Time of Pandemic (Guest Editors: Laura Benítez & Erich Berger)
- Erkki Huhtamo, The Self-Driving Car: A Media Machine for Posthumans? , Artnodes: No. 26: (July 2021). NODE 26. AI, Arts & Design: Questioning Learning Machines (Guest Editors: A. Burbano & R. West)
<< < 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.