Cossos afectius: pràctiques íntimes de disseny per reinventar la vida quotidiana

Main Article Content

Roger Paez
Manuela Valtchanova

Aquest article investiga algunes de les implicacions de les pràctiques íntimes de disseny mitjançant dos projectes acadèmics que s’han dut a terme en el context d’un present inestable. Sosté que les pràctiques de disseny tenen la capacitat de fomentar la intimitat i l’afecte a través del punt de vista de les polítiques de la cura. Els autors es basen en la idea dels cossos afectius per afirmar que el disseny pot explorar nous camins que reinventin la vida quotidiana i se centrin en els contextos recents, afectats per la crisi. L’article examina de quina manera les pràctiques íntimes que reformulen les polítiques quotidianes poden reprendre la temporalitat, la ciutadania activa i l’afectivitat radical com a necessitats infraestructurals en els hàbitats urbans contemporanis.


Els dos estudis de cas es van dur a terme entre el març de 2020 i el desembre de 2021, sota el clima d’emergència provocat pel sobtat brot de COVID-19 a l’Europa occidental que es va sumar a la crisi de refugiats al mar Mediterrani. Atès que cada vegada es desdibuixa més la frontera entre el que és privat i el que és públic, entre el que és personal i el que és polític, és especialment rellevant explorar la intimitat com un mitjà per emprendre accions políticament empoderades a través del disseny. L’objectiu dels dos estudis de cas és interrompre durant un temps els usos convencionals dels espais urbans col·lectius per generar llocs de resistència que explorin els potencials subliminars dels espais urbans i ens permetin imaginar, o fins i tot experimentar, diferents tipus de vida a través d’una visió actualitzada de la cura. Aquestes irrupcions d’apropiacions intersubjectives d’espais urbans no només tenen un impacte emblemàtic, sinó que també tenen un efecte acumulatiu perquè generen una creixent xarxa de cossos afectius en acció. Aquesta xarxa afectiva emergent ofereix oportunitats rellevants per transformar contextos urbans afectats per crisis a través d’interaccions dinàmiques entre la socialitat i l’espacialitat.

Paraules clau
afecte, intimitat, cura, cos, disseny, ciutat, quotidianitat, pandèmia, migració

Article Details

Com citar
Paez, Roger; and Valtchanova, Manuela. “Cossos afectius: pràctiques íntimes de disseny per reinventar la vida quotidiana”. Temes de Disseny, no. 38, pp. 92-115, doi:10.46467/TdD38.2022.92-115.
Biografies de l'autor/a

Roger Paez, Elisava, Facultat de Disseny i Enginyeria de Barcelona (UVic-UCC)

Arquitecte, professor i investigador. Estudis d’arquitectura a ETSAB, Barcelona (llicenciatura); màster en Disseny Arquitectònic Avançat a la Columbia University, Nova York (premi GSAPP Honor Award for Excellence in Design); doctorat a la UPC, Barcelona (excel·lent cum laude); doctor certificat (AQU 2020).

Experiència personal als estudis d’Alison+Peter Smithson i Enric Miralles. Fundador d’AiB (www.aib.cat), un estudi dedicat a la pràctica arquitectònica contemporània amb una tendència crítica.

Professor de Disseny Arquitectònic a ETSALS (UPF), director de MEATS a ELISAVA (UVic) (meats.elisava.net), professor convidat a universitats de tot el món, entre les quals hi ha Columbia, Cornell, Harvard, IIT, Sci-ARC i USC als Estats Units; i ETSAB, ETSAV, BAC, IaaC, UdP (Porto), ETSAM (Madrid), ENA (París), PJAIT (Varsòvia), UMA (Umea) i ETH (Zurich) a Europa.

Membre de la junta editorial de Quaderns d’arquitectura i urbanisme, guardonada amb el premi Jean Tschumi.

Investigador principal a ELISAVA Research, on desenvolupa projectes d’investigació públics i privats. Publica regularment articles científics i llibres, entre els quals destaquen Design Strategies for Temporary Intervention in Public Space (Elisava, 2013), Critical Prison Design (Actar, 2014), i Operative Mapping: Maps as Design Tools (Actar, 2019). 

Treballa en la intersecció entre el disseny, l’arquitectura i la ciutat, on se centra en la temporalitat, l’experimentació i l’impacte social.

Manuela Valtchanova, Elisava, Facultat de Disseny i Enginyeria de Barcelona (UVic-UCC)

Arquitecta (TUM, Munic / UACEG, Sofia, 2015), investigadora de doctorat a la Universitat de Barcelona (grup d’investigació d’Arte, Globalització i Interculturalitat) i ELISAVA Research (grup d’investigació HIMTS), a més de professora associada del màster d’Arquitectura Efímera i Espais Temporals, ELISAVA.

Durant la seva carrera professional, des del 2012 ha col·laborat a diversos despatxos d’arquitectura. Actualment treballa a l’estudi Queralt Suau, que duu a terme projectes que tracten els formats d’arquitectura heterogènia, des dels espais d’escenaris i exposicions fins a les intervencions en espais públics.

Des de l’abril de 2018 forma part del grup d’investigació d’ELISAVA, on actualment desenvolupa projectes d’arquitectura efímera, cartografia operativa i cohesió social. També ha estat professora auxiliar tutora en diferents formats acadèmics, on ha treballat en estratègies de disseny relacionades amb l’urbanisme transformador, els espais temporals i les intervencions en l’espai públic. La seva investigació de doctorat explora la idea de l’arquitectura de l’acció o les pràctiques socioespacials de la intersubjetivitat, la singularització i les noves temporalitats dels espais habitats de la ciutat contemporània.

Referències

Arlandis, Alberto Atlés. 2018. “Delaying the Image: Toward an Aesthetics of Encounter”. In After Effects vol2. Theories and Methodologies in Architectural Research, edited by Helène Frichot and Gunnar Sandin, 273–87. New YorkActar Publishers.

Bellacasa, María Puig de la. 2012. “‘Nothing comes without its world’: Thinking with care”. Sociological Review 60 (2): 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x

Brott, Simone. 2002. “A theory of the affective body: Deleuze, space, bodies.” https://eprints.qut.edu.au/67285/

Butler, Judith. 2015. “Precariousness and Grievability–When is Life Grievable?”. Verso Blog. 2015. https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/2339-judith-butler-precariousness-and-grievability-when-is-life-grievable

Cantat, Céline, Hélène Thiollet, and Antoine Pécoud. 2020. “Migration as crisis. Framework paper”. Hyper Article en Ligne - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société. http://isidore.science/document/10670/1.8ukfdf

Certeau, Michel de. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkley: University of California Press.

Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateau: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.

Dezeuze, Anna. 2017. Almost Nothing: Observations on precarious practices in contemporary art. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Dominguez, Virginia. 1987. “Of Other Peoples: Beyond the ‘Salvage’ Paradigm”. In Discussions in Contemporary Culture: Number One, edited by Hal Foster, 131–37. Seattle: Bay Press.

Drotbohm, Heike, and Ines Hasselberg. 2019. “Deportation, Crisis and Social Change”. In The Oxford Handbook of Migration Crisis, edited by Cecilia Menjívar, Marie Ruiz, and Immanuel Ness. Oxford: Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190856908.013.18

Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy”. Social text 25/26: 56–80.

Ganis, Richard. 2011. Between Measurability and Immeasurability: The Politics of Care in Habermas and Derrida. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. An Inquiery into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hardt, Michael. 2007. “Foreword: What Affects Are Good For”. In The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social, edited by Patricia Ticineto Clough and Jean Halley, ix–xiii. Durham: Duke University Press.

Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2009. “The Becoming-Prince of the Multitude”. MutualArt. https://www.mutualart.com/Article/The-Becoming-Prince-of-the-Multitude/42D5DE0A00576051

Karami, Sepideh. 2018. “Critical Inhabitation: Interruption and Performative Criticality”. In After Effects vol2. Theories and Methodologies in Architectural Research, edited by Helène Frichot and Gunnar Sandin, 300–311. New York: Actar Publisher.

Lavender, Andy. 2016. Performance in the Twenty-First Century: Theaters of Engagement. London: Routledge.

Lozoya, Johanna. 2018. “Giro afectivo: una aproximación al dilema espacial de las emociones”. Bitácora arquitectura 39: 34. https://doi.org/10.22201/fa.14058901p.2018.39.67825

Massip-Bosch, Enric. 2020. “SARS-CoV-2 (i arquitectura) II”. El Temps de les Arts. 2020. https://tempsarts.cat/sars-cov-2-i-arquitectura-ii/

Negri, Antonio. 2000. “Kairòs, Alma Venus, Multitudo”. In Time for Revolution, 139–248. London: Continuum.

Otero Verzier, Marina, and Katía Truijen. 2021. “Editorial”. Ardeth 8 [Burn-out: On Planetary Exhaustion and Alternative Public Infrastructures]: 19–29. https://doi.org/10.17454/ARDETH08.02

Paez, Roger. 2020. “Ephemeral Architecture and Social Purpose”. In IF – Social Design for Sustainable Cities, edited by Ewa Satalecka, Jan Piechota, and Marjatta Itkonen, 29-33 [and 236-247]. Warsaw: PJAIT and EUNIC Warsaw.

Paez, Roger, and Manuela Valtchanova. 2021. “Harnessing Conflict: Antagonism and Spatiotemporal Design Practices”. Temes de Disseny 37: 182-213. https://doi.org/10.46467/TdD37.2021.182-213

Paez, Roger, Manuela Valtchanova, Saúl Baeza, Marc Aliart, and Ber Arce. 2022. Portable Public Space: Embodied Responses to the Mediterranean Refugee Crisis. Barcelona: Elisava. https://doi.org/10.46467/Elisava_Portable‐Public‐Space

Presti, Laura Lo. 2020. “Like a Map Over Troubled Water: (Un)mapping the Mediterranean Sea’s Terraqueous Necropolitics”. E-Flux 109. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/109/330800/like-a-map-over-troubled-water-un-mapping-the-mediterranean-sea-s-terraqueous-necropolitics/

Rancière, Jacques. 2010. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics.. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Rendell, Jane. 2006. Art and Arcitecture: A place Between. London: I.B.Tauris.

Sager, Alex. 2019. “Migration Crises and the Ethics of Representation”. In Oxford Handbook of Migration Crises, edited by Cecilia Menjívar, Marie Ruiz, and Immanuel Ness, 589-602. New York: Oxford University Press.

Satalecka, Ewa, Jan Piechota, and Marjatta Itkonen, eds. 2020. IF – Social Design for Sustainable Cities. Warsaw: PJAIT and EUNIC Warsaw.

Seppälä, Tiina, Tapio Nykänen, Saara Koikkalainen, Enni Mikkonen, and Minna Rainio. 2020. “In-Between Space/Time: Affective Exceptionality during the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Northern Finland”. Nordic Journal of Migration Research 10 (1): 87. https://doi.org/10.2478/njmr-2019-0029

Soja, Edward W. 1980. “The Socio-Spatial Dialectic”. In Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70(2): 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x

Stierl, Maurice. 2016. “Contestations in death – the role of grief in migration struggles”. Citizenship Studies 20 (2): 173–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2015.1132571

Thrift, Nigel. 2008. Non -Representational Theory. Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.

Valtchanova, Manuela, and Roger Paez. 2019. “The City of the Other. Aesthetics of the Accident and Architecture of Action”. In ON ARCHITECTURE: Challenges in Architecture, Urban Design and Art. Belgrade: Strand Sustainable Urban Society Association.

Vaughan, Laurene. 2018. Designing Cultures of Care. London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.

Woodly, Deva, Rachel H. Brown, Mara Marin, Shatema Threadcraft, Christopher Paul Harris, Jasmine Syedullah, and Miriam Ticktin. 2021. “The politics of care”. Contemporary Political Theory 20(4): 890–925. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-021-00515-8

Arlandis, Alberto Atlés. 2018. “Delaying the Image: Toward an Aesthetics of Encounter”. In After Effects vol2. Theories and Methodologies in Architectural Research, edited by Helène Frichot and Gunnar Sandin, 273–87. New YorkActar Publishers.

Bellacasa, María Puig de la. 2012. “‘Nothing comes without its world’: Thinking with care”. Sociological Review 60 (2): 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x

Brott, Simone. 2002. “A theory of the affective body: Deleuze, space, bodies.” https://eprints.qut.edu.au/67285/

Butler, Judith. 2015. “Precariousness and Grievability–When is Life Grievable?”. Verso Blog. 2015. https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/2339-judith-butler-precariousness-and-grievability-when-is-life-grievable

Cantat, Céline, Hélène Thiollet, and Antoine Pécoud. 2020. “Migration as crisis. Framework paper”. Hyper Article en Ligne - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société. http://isidore.science/document/10670/1.8ukfdf

Certeau, Michel de. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkley: University of California Press.

Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateau: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.

Dezeuze, Anna. 2017. Almost Nothing: Observations on precarious practices in contemporary art. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Dominguez, Virginia. 1987. “Of Other Peoples: Beyond the ‘Salvage’ Paradigm”. In Discussions in Contemporary Culture: Number One, edited by Hal Foster, 131–37. Seattle: Bay Press.

Drotbohm, Heike, and Ines Hasselberg. 2019. “Deportation, Crisis and Social Change”. In The Oxford Handbook of Migration Crisis, edited by Cecilia Menjívar, Marie Ruiz, and Immanuel Ness. Oxford: Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190856908.013.18

Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy”. Social text 25/26: 56–80.

Ganis, Richard. 2011. Between Measurability and Immeasurability: The Politics of Care in Habermas and Derrida. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. An Inquiery into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hardt, Michael. 2007. “Foreword: What Affects Are Good For”. In The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social, edited by Patricia Ticineto Clough and Jean Halley, ix–xiii. Durham: Duke University Press.

Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2009. “The Becoming-Prince of the Multitude”. MutualArt. https://www.mutualart.com/Article/The-Becoming-Prince-of-the-Multitude/42D5DE0A00576051

Karami, Sepideh. 2018. “Critical Inhabitation: Interruption and Performative Criticality”. In After Effects vol2. Theories and Methodologies in Architectural Research, edited by Helène Frichot and Gunnar Sandin, 300–311. New York: Actar Publisher.

Lavender, Andy. 2016. Performance in the Twenty-First Century: Theaters of Engagement. London: Routledge.

Lozoya, Johanna. 2018. “Giro afectivo: una aproximación al dilema espacial de las emociones”. Bitácora arquitectura 39: 34. https://doi.org/10.22201/fa.14058901p.2018.39.67825

Massip-Bosch, Enric. 2020. “SARS-CoV-2 (i arquitectura) II”. El Temps de les Arts. 2020. https://tempsarts.cat/sars-cov-2-i-arquitectura-ii/

Negri, Antonio. 2000. “Kairòs, Alma Venus, Multitudo”. In Time for Revolution, 139–248. London: Continuum.

Otero Verzier, Marina, and Katía Truijen. 2021. “Editorial”. Ardeth 8 [Burn-out: On Planetary Exhaustion and Alternative Public Infrastructures]: 19–29. https://doi.org/10.17454/ARDETH08.02

Paez, Roger. 2020. “Ephemeral Architecture and Social Purpose”. In IF – Social Design for Sustainable Cities, edited by Ewa Satalecka, Jan Piechota, and Marjatta Itkonen, 29-33 [and 236-247]. Warsaw: PJAIT and EUNIC Warsaw.

Paez, Roger, and Manuela Valtchanova. 2021. “Harnessing Conflict: Antagonism and Spatiotemporal Design Practices”. Temes de Disseny 37: 182-213. https://doi.org/10.46467/TdD37.2021.182-213

Paez, Roger, Manuela Valtchanova, Saúl Baeza, Marc Aliart, and Ber Arce. 2022. Portable Public Space: Embodied Responses to the Mediterranean Refugee Crisis. Barcelona: Elisava. https://doi.org/10.46467/Elisava_Portable‐Public‐Space

Presti, Laura Lo. 2020. “Like a Map Over Troubled Water: (Un)mapping the Mediterranean Sea’s Terraqueous Necropolitics”. E-Flux 109. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/109/330800/like-a-map-over-troubled-water-un-mapping-the-mediterranean-sea-s-terraqueous-necropolitics/

Rancière, Jacques. 2010. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics.. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Rendell, Jane. 2006. Art and Arcitecture: A place Between. London: I.B.Tauris.

Sager, Alex. 2019. “Migration Crises and the Ethics of Representation”. In Oxford Handbook of Migration Crises, edited by Cecilia Menjívar, Marie Ruiz, and Immanuel Ness, 589-602. New York: Oxford University Press.

Satalecka, Ewa, Jan Piechota, and Marjatta Itkonen, eds. 2020. IF – Social Design for Sustainable Cities. Warsaw: PJAIT and EUNIC Warsaw.

Seppälä, Tiina, Tapio Nykänen, Saara Koikkalainen, Enni Mikkonen, and Minna Rainio. 2020. “In-Between Space/Time: Affective Exceptionality during the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Northern Finland”. Nordic Journal of Migration Research 10 (1): 87. https://doi.org/10.2478/njmr-2019-0029

Soja, Edward W. 1980. “The Socio-Spatial Dialectic”. In Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70(2): 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x

Stierl, Maurice. 2016. “Contestations in death – the role of grief in migration struggles”. Citizenship Studies 20 (2): 173–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2015.1132571

Thrift, Nigel. 2008. Non -Representational Theory. Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.

Valtchanova, Manuela, and Roger Paez. 2019. “The City of the Other. Aesthetics of the Accident and Architecture of Action”. In ON ARCHITECTURE: Challenges in Architecture, Urban Design and Art. Belgrade: Strand Sustainable Urban Society Association.

Vaughan, Laurene. 2018. Designing Cultures of Care. London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.

Woodly, Deva, Rachel H. Brown, Mara Marin, Shatema Threadcraft, Christopher Paul Harris, Jasmine Syedullah, and Miriam Ticktin. 2021. “The politics of care”. Contemporary Political Theory 20(4): 890–925. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-021-00515-8