Affective Bodies: Intimate Design Practices to Reinvent the Everyday
Article Sidebar
Google Scholar citations
Main Article Content
This article investigates some of the implications of intimate design practices by presenting two academic projects carried out within the context of an uncertain present. It argues that design practices have the capacity to foster intimacy and affect through the lens of the politics of care. Drawing on the notion of affective bodies, the authors claim that design can explore new paths to reinvent the everyday, focusing on recent crisis-ridden contexts. The article examines how intimate practices that reformulate everyday politics can reclaim temporality, active citizenship and radical affectivity as infrastructural needs in contemporary urban habitats.
The two case studies date from March 2020 through December 2021 under the climate of crisis brought about by the sudden outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Western Europe and the ongoing Mediterranean refugee crisis. Given the escalation of the blurring between the private and public spheres, the personal and the political, it is especially relevant to explore intimacy as a means of enacting politically empowered action through design. Both case studies aim to temporarily interrupt conventional uses of collective urban spaces in order to generate pockets of resistance that explore the subliminal potentials of urban spaces and allow us to imagine, and even experience, different ways of living through an updated lens of care. These irruptions of intersubjective appropriations of urban spaces not only have an emblematic impact, but also a cumulative effect by generating a growing network of affective bodies in action. This emergent affective network offers relevant opportunities for the transformation of crisis-ridden urban contexts through dynamic interactions between sociality and spatiality.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
(c) Roger Paez, Manuela Valtchanova, 2022
Roger Paez, Elisava, Barcelona School of Design and Engineering (UVic-UCC)
PhD architect, professor and researcher. Architect ETSAB, Barcelona (Hons.); MS AAD Columbia University, New York (GSAPP Honor Award for Excellence in Design); PhD UPC, Barcelona (Excellent Cum Laude); Certified PhD (AQU 2020).
Professional experience in the studios of Alison+Peter Smithson and Enric Miralles. Founder of AiB (www.aib.cat) a studio devoted to contemporary architectural practice with a critical edge.
Architectural design professor at ETSALS (UPF), MEATS director at ELISAVA (UVic) (meats.elisava.net), guest professor at universities worldwide, including Columbia, Cornell, Harvard, IIT, Sci-ARC and USC in the USA; and ETSAB, ETSAV, BAC, IaaC, UdP (Porto), ETSAM (Madrid), ENA (Paris), PJAIT (Warsaw), UMA (Umeå) and ETH (Zürich) in Europe.
Member of the editorial board of Quaderns d’arquitectura i urbanisme, awarded the Jean Tschumi Prize.
Research leader at ELISAVA Research, where he develops public and private research projects. He regularly publishes both scientific articles and books, notably Design Strategies for Temporary Intervention in Public Space (Elisava, 2013), Critical Prison Design (Actar, 2014), and Operative Mapping: Maps as Design Tools (Actar, 2019).
He works at the intersection of design, architecture and the city, focusing on temporality, experimentation and social impact.
Manuela Valtchanova, Elisava, Barcelona School of Design and Engineering (UVic-UCC)
Architect (TUM, Munich / UACEG, Sofia, 2015), PhD researcher at the University of Barcelona (Art, Globalization and Interculturality Research group) and ELISAVA Research (HIMTS Research group) and associated professor with the Master of Ephemeral Architecture and Temporary Spaces, ELISAVA.
In her professional career, since 2012 she has collaborated in several architectural offices. Presently, she is a part of the team of Queralt Suau studio, which carries out projects that address heterogeneous architecture formats, ranging from stage and exhibition spaces to interventions in public space.
Since April 2018, she has been part of the ELISAVA Research team, where she is currently developing projects that deal with ephemeral architecture, operative mapping and social cohesion. She has also taken part as an assistant professor and a tutor in several academic formats, working on design strategies related to transformative urbanism, temporary spaces and interventions in public space. Her PhD investigation explores the idea of architecture of the action or the socio-spatial practices of intersubjectivity, singularisation and new temporalities in the lived spaces of the contemporary city.
Arlandis, Alberto Atlés. 2018. “Delaying the Image: Toward an Aesthetics of Encounter”. In After Effects vol2. Theories and Methodologies in Architectural Research, edited by Helène Frichot and Gunnar Sandin, 273–87. New YorkActar Publishers.
Bellacasa, María Puig de la. 2012. “‘Nothing comes without its world’: Thinking with care”. Sociological Review 60 (2): 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x
Brott, Simone. 2002. “A theory of the affective body: Deleuze, space, bodies.” https://eprints.qut.edu.au/67285/
Butler, Judith. 2015. “Precariousness and Grievability–When is Life Grievable?”. Verso Blog. 2015. https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/2339-judith-butler-precariousness-and-grievability-when-is-life-grievable
Cantat, Céline, Hélène Thiollet, and Antoine Pécoud. 2020. “Migration as crisis. Framework paper”. Hyper Article en Ligne - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société. http://isidore.science/document/10670/1.8ukfdf
Certeau, Michel de. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkley: University of California Press.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateau: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
Dezeuze, Anna. 2017. Almost Nothing: Observations on precarious practices in contemporary art. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Dominguez, Virginia. 1987. “Of Other Peoples: Beyond the ‘Salvage’ Paradigm”. In Discussions in Contemporary Culture: Number One, edited by Hal Foster, 131–37. Seattle: Bay Press.
Drotbohm, Heike, and Ines Hasselberg. 2019. “Deportation, Crisis and Social Change”. In The Oxford Handbook of Migration Crisis, edited by Cecilia Menjívar, Marie Ruiz, and Immanuel Ness. Oxford: Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190856908.013.18
Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy”. Social text 25/26: 56–80.
Ganis, Richard. 2011. Between Measurability and Immeasurability: The Politics of Care in Habermas and Derrida. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. An Inquiery into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hardt, Michael. 2007. “Foreword: What Affects Are Good For”. In The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social, edited by Patricia Ticineto Clough and Jean Halley, ix–xiii. Durham: Duke University Press.
Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2009. “The Becoming-Prince of the Multitude”. MutualArt. https://www.mutualart.com/Article/The-Becoming-Prince-of-the-Multitude/42D5DE0A00576051
Karami, Sepideh. 2018. “Critical Inhabitation: Interruption and Performative Criticality”. In After Effects vol2. Theories and Methodologies in Architectural Research, edited by Helène Frichot and Gunnar Sandin, 300–311. New York: Actar Publisher.
Lavender, Andy. 2016. Performance in the Twenty-First Century: Theaters of Engagement. London: Routledge.
Lozoya, Johanna. 2018. “Giro afectivo: una aproximación al dilema espacial de las emociones”. Bitácora arquitectura 39: 34. https://doi.org/10.22201/fa.14058901p.2018.39.67825
Massip-Bosch, Enric. 2020. “SARS-CoV-2 (i arquitectura) II”. El Temps de les Arts. 2020. https://tempsarts.cat/sars-cov-2-i-arquitectura-ii/
Negri, Antonio. 2000. “Kairòs, Alma Venus, Multitudo”. In Time for Revolution, 139–248. London: Continuum.
Otero Verzier, Marina, and Katía Truijen. 2021. “Editorial”. Ardeth 8 [Burn-out: On Planetary Exhaustion and Alternative Public Infrastructures]: 19–29. https://doi.org/10.17454/ARDETH08.02
Paez, Roger. 2020. “Ephemeral Architecture and Social Purpose”. In IF – Social Design for Sustainable Cities, edited by Ewa Satalecka, Jan Piechota, and Marjatta Itkonen, 29-33 [and 236-247]. Warsaw: PJAIT and EUNIC Warsaw.
Paez, Roger, and Manuela Valtchanova. 2021. “Harnessing Conflict: Antagonism and Spatiotemporal Design Practices”. Temes de Disseny 37: 182-213. https://doi.org/10.46467/TdD37.2021.182-213
Paez, Roger, Manuela Valtchanova, Saúl Baeza, Marc Aliart, and Ber Arce. 2022. Portable Public Space: Embodied Responses to the Mediterranean Refugee Crisis. Barcelona: Elisava. https://doi.org/10.46467/Elisava_Portable‐Public‐Space
Presti, Laura Lo. 2020. “Like a Map Over Troubled Water: (Un)mapping the Mediterranean Sea’s Terraqueous Necropolitics”. E-Flux 109. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/109/330800/like-a-map-over-troubled-water-un-mapping-the-mediterranean-sea-s-terraqueous-necropolitics/
Rancière, Jacques. 2010. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics.. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Rendell, Jane. 2006. Art and Arcitecture: A place Between. London: I.B.Tauris.
Sager, Alex. 2019. “Migration Crises and the Ethics of Representation”. In Oxford Handbook of Migration Crises, edited by Cecilia Menjívar, Marie Ruiz, and Immanuel Ness, 589-602. New York: Oxford University Press.
Satalecka, Ewa, Jan Piechota, and Marjatta Itkonen, eds. 2020. IF – Social Design for Sustainable Cities. Warsaw: PJAIT and EUNIC Warsaw.
Seppälä, Tiina, Tapio Nykänen, Saara Koikkalainen, Enni Mikkonen, and Minna Rainio. 2020. “In-Between Space/Time: Affective Exceptionality during the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Northern Finland”. Nordic Journal of Migration Research 10 (1): 87. https://doi.org/10.2478/njmr-2019-0029
Soja, Edward W. 1980. “The Socio-Spatial Dialectic”. In Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70(2): 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x
Stierl, Maurice. 2016. “Contestations in death – the role of grief in migration struggles”. Citizenship Studies 20 (2): 173–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2015.1132571
Thrift, Nigel. 2008. Non -Representational Theory. Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.
Valtchanova, Manuela, and Roger Paez. 2019. “The City of the Other. Aesthetics of the Accident and Architecture of Action”. In ON ARCHITECTURE: Challenges in Architecture, Urban Design and Art. Belgrade: Strand Sustainable Urban Society Association.
Vaughan, Laurene. 2018. Designing Cultures of Care. London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
Woodly, Deva, Rachel H. Brown, Mara Marin, Shatema Threadcraft, Christopher Paul Harris, Jasmine Syedullah, and Miriam Ticktin. 2021. “The politics of care”. Contemporary Political Theory 20(4): 890–925. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-021-00515-8
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Roger Paez, Manuela Valtchanova, Harnessing Conflict: Antagonism and Spatiotemporal Design Practices , Temes de Disseny: No. 37 (2021): Invisible Conflicts: A New Terrain of Bodies, Infrastructures and Information
- Roger Paez, Mariana Amatullo, Emerging habitats: Design as a Worldmaking Agent , Temes de Disseny: No. 39 (2023): Emerging Habitats: Design as a Worldmaking Agent