Merging or plagiarizing? The role of originality and derivative works in AI-aimed news production

Main Article Content

Javier Díaz Noci

The emergence of artificial intelligence systems applied to news production raises a series of legal questions that we examine in this short article. The central concept is, in our opinion, that of originality and creativity, legal requirements for attributing authorship and setting in motion the mechanisms of legal protection for a work, be it simple or collaborative, or even composite. The type of work that raises most questions is the derivative work, obtained from the transformation of pre-existing work(s), whose rights of authorship and economic exploitation must be respected at all times. The practices of learning systems based on artificial intelligence, which explicitly recognise that they rely on a wide variety of works protected by copyright, pose many doubts, and are not clearly able to benefit from the fair use exception, which, moreover, is only applicable to works produced in Common law jurisdictions, but not in other countries with an authorial system of intellectual property protection.

Keywords
Copyright, Intellectual property, Originality, Creativity, Derivative works, News production, Artificial intelligence

Article Details

How to Cite
Díaz Noci, Javier. “Merging or plagiarizing? The role of originality and derivative works in AI-aimed news production”. Hipertext.net, no. 26, pp. 69-76, doi:10.31009/hipertext.net.2023.i26.11.
Author Biography

Javier Díaz Noci, Pompeu Fabra University

Javier Díaz-Noci. He is full professor of Communication. Main researcher of the Newsnet project (News, Networks and Users in the Hybrid Media System. Transformation of the Media Industry and the News in the Post-Industrial Era, 2019-2022). Member of the DigiDoc research group and its coordinator (2020-2022). He studied Journalism at the University of the Basque Country (1982-1987), where he defensed his PhD dissertation in History. He studied Law at the same University (1992-1996), and got also a Diploma in Advance Legal Studies (1996-1998), equal to a Master in Law. He holds a PhD in Law as well (UPF, 2016). After teaching as a lecturer and assistant professor at my alma mater, he moved to Barcelona in 2008, to the Pompeu Fabra University. He was visiting researcher at the universities of Reno, Nevada (USA, 1997), Oxford (Basque Visiting Scholar, 1998-1999), Federal University of Bahia (Brazil, 2005 and 2008) and the University of East Anglia (United Kingdom, 2021). His main research interests are: online journalism and online news, history of journalism (specially Basque-language press and Spanish-language networks on Early Modern history), and copyright and news reporting. He has added a fourth one: information equity and fighting against the digital news divide. Author of more than 260 publications in those areas. As a journalist, he worked in several newspapers and radio stations (1985-1992). Lately, he has collaborated with the Basque public broadcasting service (Euskadi Irratia).

References

Agostinelli, A., Denk, T.I., Borsos, Z., Engel, J., Verzetti, M., Caillon, A., Huang, Q., Jansen, A., Roberts, A., Tagliasacchi, M., Sharifi, M., Zeghidour, N., & Frank, C. (2022). MusicLM: Generating Music From Text. arXiV. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.11325

Bridy, A. (2012). Coding Creativity: Copyright and the Artificially Intelligent Author. Stanford Technology Law Review, 5, 1-28.

Gervais, D. J. (2002). Feist goes global: A comparative analysis of the notion of originality in copyright law. Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 49, 949-981. https://ssrn.com/abstract=733603

Gervais, D. J. (2019). The Machine as Author. Iowa Law Review, 105, 2053-2106. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3359524

Gervais, D. J. (2020a). The human case. In R. Abbott (Ed.), Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 22-39), Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800881907.00007

Ginsburg, J. C. and Budjardio, L. A. (2019). Authors and machines. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 34, 343-456. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38SF2MC24

Hugenholtz, P. B. and Quintais, J. P. (2021). Copyright and Artificial Creation: Does EU Copyright Law Protect AI-Assisted Output? IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 52, 1190–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-021-01115-0

Kafka, P. (2023, February 2). The AI boom is here, and so are the lawsuits. Vox.com. https://www.vox.com/recode/23580554/generative-ai-chatgpt-openai-stable-diffusion-legal-battles-napster-copyright-peter-kafka-column

Lindbergh, V. (2023). Zarya of the Dawn (Registration # VAu001480196). United States Copyright Office. https://www.copyright.gov/docs/zarya-of-the-dawn.pdf

Mitchum, R. (2023, February 17). UChicago scientists develop new tool to protect artists from AI mimicry. “Glaze” program makes miniscule changes to confound AI art generators. UChicago News. https://news.uchicago.edu/story/uchicago-scientists-develop-new-tool-protect-artists-ai-mimicry

Samuelson, P. (1986). Allocating ownership rights in computer-generated works. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 47, 1185-1228.

Trapova, A. (2023). Copyright for AI-generated Works: a Task for the Internal Market? European Law Review, 48. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4418936

Trapova, A., & Mezei, P. (2021). Robojournalism – A Copyright Study on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the European News Industry. GRUR International, 71(7), 589-602. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikac038

Yan, L. (2020, January 9). Court rules AI-written article has copyright. China Daily Global. http://www.ecns.cn/news/2020-01-09/detail-ifzsqcrm6562963.shtml

Most read articles by the same author(s)