Artificial corporeality in media art: tracing the genealogy of soft robotic aesthetics
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
In recent decades, there has been a shift in robotics, leaning towards soft materials, which has resulted in a new class of soft robotics. Inspired by biological structures, soft robots are machines primarily composed of synthetic materials with elastic moduli comparable to those of soft organic materials. Their lifelike, bio-inspired qualities enable them to facilitate novel types of human-robot interactions. Soft robots have gained prominence in media art installations and performances, forging a distinctive, yet underexplored field within media art. This article aims to generate knowledge in soft robotics from the perspective of media art history, a dynamic and interdisciplinary field that traces soft robot aesthetics through various (media) art historical trajectories: soft feminist sculpture, inflatables and cybernetic sculpture. The study’s findings contribute to a better understanding of the role of soft robots’ corporeal design in human-robot interaction, constructing artificial corporeality – a conceptual framework for analyzing bio-inspired machines, particularly robots. The paper investigates the origins of soft robotic media art and performance, while also placing the field within the framework of posthuman theory (e.g. the work of Rosi Braidotti, Karen Barad and N. Katherine Hayles) and new materialism through the symbolic figuration of a boundary object (Susan Leigh Star and James R. Griesemer). Consequently, it enhances our comprehension of the field’s implications for soft robotics engineering, media art, human-robot interaction and the expanding ripples in culture and society.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
(c) Andrea Tešanović, 2024
Copyright
For all articles published in Artnodes that are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence, copyright is retained by the author(s). The complete text the license can be consulted at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s).
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary licences for the images that are subject to copyright.
Assignment of intellectual property rights
The author non exclusively transfers the rights to use (reproduce, distribute, publicly broadcast or transform) and market the work, in full or part, to the journal’s editors in all present and future formats and modalities, in all languages, for the lifetime of the work and worldwide.
I hereby declare that I am the original author of the work. The editors shall thus not be held responsible for any obligation or legal action that may derive from the work submitted in terms of violation of third parties’ rights, whether intellectual property, trade secret or any other right.
Andrea Tešanović, Independent Researcher
An artist and researcher with an interdisciplinary background in media art, cultural management and new media. Her research field encompasses topics such as new media technologies, robotic art, video art, and cyberfeminism, and she works at the nexus of art, science and technology. Over recent years, she has produced new media art and performances and published several research papers. She graduated from the distinguished Media Arts Cultures MA program in 2023 (joint degree from Danube University in Austria, University of Łódź in Poland, Aalborg University in Denmark, and The LASSALE College of the Arts in Singapore), with previous studies encompassing a BA in Art Production and an MA in Transdisciplinary Humanities and Art Theory. Her artistic practice-based research projects and performances have been exhibited in the Museum of Contemporary Art Belgrade (RS), Art Quarter Budapest (HU), Art Factory Lodz (PL), MicroPOM (Politics of Machines) (DK), AU Vienna (AT), and others. She has presented her work at the International Summit of Electronic Arts (ISEA) in Barcelona, The Aesthetics of Biomachine and The Question of Life in Copenhagen, and others. She has collaborated with the AI-based simulation software company DimensionLab, media art festival Ars Electronica and the United Nations.
Anderson Kayla. “Object Intermediaries: How New Media Artists Translate the Language of Things”. Leonardo, vol. 47, no. 4, (2014): 352-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2601080.2677712
Barad, Karen. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 28, no. 3, (2003). The University of Chicago. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq
Barla, Josef. The Techno-Apparatus of Bodily Production A New Materialist Theory of Technology and the Body. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839447444
Benthall, Jonathan. Science and Technology in Art Today. London: Thames and Hudson, 1972.
Blackman, Lisa. The Body: The Key Concepts. London and New York: Routledge, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003087892
Braidotti, Rosi. The Posthuman. Hoboken, NJ: Polity, 2013.
Brooks, Rodney. Flesh and Machines: How Robots Will Change Us. New York: Pantheon Books, 2002.
Burnham, Jack. Beyond Modern Sculpture: The Effects of Science and Technology on the Sculpture of This Century. New York: George Braziller, 1973.
Burrows, Leah. “The first autonomous, entirely soft robot”. Wyss Institute, (2016). Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University. https://wyss.harvard.edu/news/the-first-autonomous-entirely-soft-robot/. [Accessed: 29 May 2024].
Choset, Howie, Kevin M. Lynch, Seth Hutchinson, George A. Kantor, Wolfram Burgard, Lydia E. Kavraki and Sebastian Thrun. Principles of Robot Motion: Theory, Algorithms, and Implementations. MIT Press, 2005.
Collins, Lorna. “The Wild Being of Louise Bourgeois: Merleau-Ponty in the Flesh”. Romance studies, vol. 28, no. 1, (2010, January): 47-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/174581509X12575089122008
Coole, Diana and Samantha Frost (eds.). New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Duke University Press, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw2wk
Devellennes, Charles and Benoît Dillet. “Questioning new materialisms: an introduction”. Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 35, no. 7-8, (2018): 5-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418803432
Duffy Brian R. and Gina Joue. “Intelligent Robots: The Question Of Embodiment”. ResearchGate, (2000). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228375813_Intelligent_robots_The_question_of_embodiment
Francis, Sharon. Bubbletecture: Inflatable architecture and design. London; New York: Phaidon Press, 2019.
Haraway, Donna. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1991.
Harrison, David, Wiktor Rorot, Urte Laukaityte. “Mind the matter: Active matter, soft robotics, and the making of bio-inspired artificial intelligence”. Front Neurorobot, (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2022.880724
Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies In Cybernetics, Literature, And Informatics. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001
Hoffman, Guy, Wendy Ju. “Designing Robots with Movement in Mind”. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, vol. 3, no. 1, (2014): 89-122: DOI: https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.3.1.Hoffman
Horibe Kazuya, Kathryn Walker and Sebastian Risi. (2021). “Regenerating Soft Robots Through Neural Cellular Automata”. In: Hu, T., Lourenço, N., Medvet, E. (eds.). Genetic Programming. EuroGP 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12691, (2021): 36-50. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72812-0_3
Horvath Anca-Simona, Elizabeth Jochum, Markus Löchtefeld, Karina Vissonova and Timothy Merritt. “Soft Robotics Workshops: Supporting Experiential Learning About Design, Movement, and Sustainability”. In: Dunstan, B.J., Koh, J.T.K.V., Turnbull Tillman, D., Brown, S.A. (eds.). Cultural Robotics: Social Robots and Their Emergent Cultural Ecologies. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Cham: Springer, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28138-9_13
Huang, Xiaonan, Andrew P. Sabelhaus, M. Khalid Jawed, Lihua Jin L, Jun Zou and Yuzhen Chen. “Editorial: Materials, design, modelling and control of soft robotic artificial muscles”. Front. Robot. AI, vol. 9, (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.1074549
Jørgensen, Jonas. Constructing Soft Robot Aesthetics: Art, Sensation, and Materiality in Practice. Ph.D Thesis. IT University of Copenhagen. https://pure.itu.dk/en/publications/constructing-soft-robot-aesthetics-art-sensation-and-materiality-
Jovanović, Gordana. “New Materialism, Technophilia and Emancipation”. IRTP: International Review of Theoretical Phzchologies, (2021): 245-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/irtp.v1i1.127091
Kac, Eduardo. (1997). “Origin and development of robotic art”. Art Journal, vol. 56, no. 3, Digital Reflections: The Dialogue of Art and Technology, Special issue on Electronic Art, Johanna Drucker (ed.). (CAA, NY, 1997), 60-67. https://www.ekac.org/roboticart.html
Lakoff, George and Rafael Núñez. Where Mathematics Comes From How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books, 2000.
Levillain, Florent, Elisabett Zibetti and Sébastien Lefort. “Interacting with Non-anthropomorphic Robotic Artworks and Interpreting Their Behaviour”. International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 9, (2016): 141-161. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0381-8
Margolius, Ivan. “The Robot of Prague”. The Friends of Czech Heritage Newsletter, no. 17, (2017, Autum): 3-6.
Mazzolai, Barbara, Laura Margheri, Matteo Cianchetti, Paolo Dario and Cecilia Laschi. “Soft- robotic arm inspired by the octopus: II. From artificial requirements to innovative technological solutions”. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, vol. 7, no. 2 (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/7/2/025005
Negroponte, Nicholas. Soft Architecture Machines. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: MIT Press, 1975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6317.001.0001
Olszewska, Anna and Marek Długosz. “Senster: Reactivation of a Cybernetic Sculpture”. Leonardo, vol. 54, no 3, (2019): 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_01828
Penny, Simon. Making sense: cognition, computing, art, and embodiment. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2017.
Pfeiffer, Rolf and Fumiya Iida. (2003). “Embodied Artificial Intelligence: Trends and Challenges”. In: Iida, F., Pfeifer, R., Steels, L., Kuniyoshi, Y. (eds.). Embodied Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3139, (2003). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27833-7_1
Pfeifer, Rolf, Max Lungarella and Fumiya Iida. “The Challenges Ahead for Bio-inspired ‘Soft’ Robotics”. Communications of the ACM, vol. 55, no. 11, (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2366316.2366335
Pickering, Andrew. The Cybernetic Brain. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226667928.001.0001
Riskin, Jessica. The Restless Clock: A History of the Centuries-Long Argument over What Makes Living Things Tick. University of Chicago Press, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226303086.001.0001
Reffin-Smith B. (1983). Cybernetic Art: Personal Statement by Edward Ihnatowicz.
Rus, Daniela and Michael Tolley. “Design, fabrication and control of soft robots”. Nature, no. 521, (2015): 467-475. DOI https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14543
Star, Susan Leigh and James R. Griesemer. “Institutional Ecology, `Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39”. Social Studies of Science, vo. 19, no. 3, (1989): 387-420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
Tešanović, Andrea. (2023). Soft Robots and Artificial Corporealities: Rendering Machines Supple. PhD Thesis. University of Aalborg, Denmark. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aqcts11f8y_T7J6SOstqxwKEgFYcWMhJNkCUOTTR3xs/edit?tab=t.0
Turing, Alan M. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence”. Mind, vol. LIX, no. 236, (1950): 433-460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
Turkle, Sherry. “Authenticity in the age of digital companions”. Interaction Studies, vol. 8, no. 3, (2007): 501-517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/is.8.3.11tur
Turkle, Sherry. Alone Together. New York: Basic Books, 2011.
Verl Alexander, Alin Albu-Schäffer, Oliver Brock and Annika Raatz (eds.). Soft Robotics: Transferring Theory to Application. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44506-8
Wiener, Norbert. Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1948.
Winter, Bodo and Jeff Yoshimi. “Metaphor and the Philosophical Implications of Embodied Mathematics”. Front. Psychol, vol. 11, (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569487
Wolfe, Cary. Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226905129.001.0001
Zhang Caroline Yan and Kevin Walker. “Soft grippers not only grasp fruits: From affective to psychotropic HRI”. (2019). https://aisb2019.machinemovementlab.net/MTSB2019_Zheng_Walker.pdf
Zhao, Xuanhe. “Designing Toughness And Strength For Soft Materials”. PNAS, vol. 114, no. 31, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710942114
Online resources
MediaArtTube. “Paula Gaetano Adi - Alexithymia 2005 Robot Art”. Video. YouTube, (May 26, 2008). https://youtu.be/UaKAdvaMP7w?si=pdHG245S0Bmw4E2l. [Accessed: 29 April 29 2024].
Similar Articles
- Rosa Barba, Inventory of cinematic spaces. A fictional library , Artnodes: Node 34 (July 2024). Materiology and variantology: invitation to dialogue (Editors: Siegfried Zielinski & Daniel Irrgang)
- Jennifer Willet, INCUBATOR Lab: Re-Imagining our Biotech Future Through Art / Science Research , Artnodes: Node 20 (December 2017). Art and Research (Editors: Pau Alsina, Ana Rodríguez, Irma Vilà Òdena)
- Michael Naimark, Analysis of the last twenty-five years of digital art , Artnodes: Node 4 (2005). Calculability (Editor: Pau Alsina)
- Gabriele Cosentino, Berke Alikasifoglu, Post-truth politics in the Middle East: the case studies of Syria and Turkey , Artnodes: Node (July 2019). After post-truth (Editor: Jorge Luis Marzo)
- Meredith Tromble, Very Complex Matter: Collaborations in Art and Geobiology , Artnodes: Node 20 (December 2017). Art and Research (Editors: Pau Alsina, Ana Rodríguez, Irma Vilà Òdena)
- Bart Grob, Liesbeth Groot Nibbelink, Captivating objects and the taste of performance: probing the affects of scientific objects , Artnodes: Node 35 (February 2025). Theorizing media art in light of STS (Editors: Ksenia Fedorova and Silvia Casini)
- Dolores Romero López, The Silver Age in the digital realm. Towards trans-disciplinarity and Smart culture , Artnodes: Node 22 (November 2018). Digital Humanities: societies, policies, knowledge (Editor: Nuria Rodríguez-Ortega)
- Mónica Bello Bugallo, Andy Gracie, Black Holes and Objectivity , Artnodes: Node 25 (January 2020). Dialogs Between Art and Fundamental Science (Editors: Mónica Bello & Andy Gracie)
- Tincuta Heinzel, Synthetic Beuys: on Nano-Materials and the Aesthetics of Imperceptibility , Artnodes: Node (June 2015). Art Matters I (Editors: Pau Alsina, Ana Rodríguez Granell)
- Mikel Otxoteko, Digital games beyond disciplinary and vigilance logic , Artnodes: Node 30 (July 2022). Possibles I (Editors: Pau Alsina & Andrés Burbano)
<< < 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.