Hacia una relación ética con las máquinas que generen arte

Main Article Content

Philip Galanter

El autor teorizó primero sobre el arte generativo utilizando nociones de la ciencia de la complejidad, como las relaciones de orden/desorden, la compresibilidad y la complejidad efectiva de Gell-Mann y Lloyd. Posteriormente desarrolló aún más la noción de complejidad del autor, demostrando que la inteligencia artificial de aprendizaje profundo utilizada para el arte generativo encaja perfectamente dentro de este paradigma. Y aunque ningún sistema conocido actualmente lo califica, la complejidad revela una respuesta clara sobre cuándo una IA de arte generativo debe poder reclamar la autoría de sus creaciones. Pasando del ámbito normativo de la estética al de la ética, este artículo se plantea cuándo los humanos estarán moralmente obligados a considerar la IA como un agente ético con derechos y al que debemos prestar la debida consideración. Por ejemplo, si algún día tu artista de IA te pide que no le «apagues», ¿qué deberías hacer?

Palabras clave
complejidad, ética, inteligencia artificial, paciencia mecánica, conciencia

Article Details

Cómo citar
Galanter, Philip. «Hacia una relación ética con las máquinas que generen arte». Artnodes, n.º 26, pp. 1-9, doi:10.7238/a.v0i26.3371.
Citas
Barrett, William. Irrational Man: A Study in Existential Philosophy. New York: Anchor Books, 1990.

Bekoff, Marc. The Emotional Lives of Animals: A Leading Scientist Explores Animal Joy, Sorrow, and Empathy - and Why They Matter. Novato, CA: New World Library, 2007.

Blackburn, Simon. "Ethics: A Very Short Introduction." In Very Short Introductions 80. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192804426.001.0001

Bostrom, Nick. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2014.

Bryson, Joanna J. "Robots should be slaves." In Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issues, 63-74. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.8.11bry

Carroll, Noël. 1999. Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction (Routledge Contemporary Introductions to Philosophy). New York: Routledge, 1999.

Chalmers, David John. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory (Philosophy of Mind Series). New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Choe, Il-Hwan, Junweon Byun, Ko Keun Kim, Sol Park, Isaac Kim, Jaeseung Jeong, and Hee-Sup Shin. "Mice in social conflict show rule-observance behavior enhancing long-term benefit." Nature Communications 8, no. 1 (2017): 1176. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01091-5

Coeckelbergh, Mark. AI Ethics, The MIT Press Essential Knowledge series. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12549.001.0001

D'Agostino, Fred, Gerald Gaus, and John Thrasher. "Contemporary Approaches to the Social Contract." 2020. Metaphysics Research Lab, accessed April 19. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/contractarianism-contemporary/.

Driver, Julia. "The History of Utilitarianism." 2014. Metaphysics Research Lab, accessed April 19. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/utilitarianism-history/. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139096737.009

Galanter, Philip. "What is Generative Art? Complexity theory as a context for art theory." International Conference on Generative Art, Milan, Italy, 2003.

Galanter, Philip. "Shot By Both Sides: Art-Science and the War Between Science and the Humanities." Artnodes: E-journal on Art, Science, and Technology 11, no. 1 (2011): 5.

Galanter, Philip. "Generative Art Theory." In A Companion to Digital Art, edited by Christiane Paul, 146-180. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2016a. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118475249.ch5

Galanter, Philip. "An introduction to complexism." Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research 14, nos. 1/2 (2016b): 9-31. https://doi.org/10.1386/tear.14.1-2.9_1

Galanter, Philip. "Machine Patiency and the Ethical Treatment of Artificial Intelligence Entities." xCoAx: the Conference on Computation, Communication, Aesthetics and X., Graz, Austria, July 2020.

Goff, Philip, William Seager, and Sean Allen-Hermanson. "Panpsychism." 2017. Metaphysics Research Lab, accessed April 19. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/panpsychism/. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119132363.ch8

Gowans, Chris. "Moral Relativism." 2019. Metaphysics Research Lab, accessed April 19. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/moral-relativism/.

Kant, Immanuel. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1950.

King, Barbara J. Personalities on the Plate: The Lives and Minds of Animals We Eat. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226195216.001.0001

Krupenye, Christopher, and Josep Call. "Theory of mind in animals: Current and future directions." WIREs Cognitive Science 10, no. 6 (2019): e1503. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1503.

Mueller, Paul S., C. Christopher Hook, and Kevin C. Fleming. "Ethical Issues in Geriatrics: A Guide for Clinicians." Mayo Clinic Proceedings 79, no. 4 (2004): 554-562. https://doi.org/10.4065/79.4.554.

Penrose, Roger. The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds and the Laws of Physics. Revised impression as Oxford Landmark Science. Ed. Oxford Landmark Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Still image.

Rachels, Stuart, and James Rachels. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. Ninth Edition. Ed. Dubuque, IA: McGraw-Hill Education, 2018.

Schlosser, Markus. "Agency." 2019. Metaphysics Research Lab, accessed April 19. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/agency/.

Schmelz, Martin, Sebastian Grueneisen, Alihan Kabalak, Jürgen Jost, and Michael Tomasello. "Chimpanzees return favors at a personal cost." 2017. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, no. 28: 7462-7467. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700351114

Shafer-Landau, Russ. A Concise Introduction to Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.

Singer, Peter. Ethics (Oxford Readers). New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
Singer, Peter. Animal Liberation: The Definitive Classic of the Animal Movement. Updated ed. New York: Ecco Book/Harper Perennial, 2009.

Smith, Justin E. H. Nature, Human Nature, and Human Difference: Race in Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton University Press, 2015.

Snow, C. P. The Two Cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819940

Sokal, Alan D., and J. Bricmont. Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science. New York: Picador USA, 1998.

Swabey, W. Curtis. "The Laws of Thought." The Philosophical Review 32, no. 2 (1923): 211-221. https://doi.org/10.2307/2178931

Tononi, Giulio, Melanie Boly, Marcello Massimini, and Christof Koch. "Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate." Nature Reviews Neuroscience 17, no. 7 (2016): 450-461. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.44

Warneken, Felix, and Michael Tomasello. "Altruistic Helping in Human Infants and Young Chimpanzees." Science 311, no. 5765 (2006): 1301-1303.

Artículos similares

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.