Towards Ethical Relationships with Machines That Make Art
Article Sidebar
Google Scholar citations
Main Article Content
The author has previously theorised generative art using notions from complexity science such as order/disorder relationships, compressibility, and Gell-Mann and Lloyd’s effective complexity. Subsequent work further developing the author’s notion of complexism has demonstrated that deep learning artificial intelligence used for generative art fits snugly within this paradigm. And while no known system currently qualifies, complexism reveals a clear answer as to when a generative art AI should be truly credited as the author of its creations. Moving from the normative realm of aesthetics to that of ethics, this article considers when humans will be morally obliged to recognise AIs as ethical agents worthy of rights and due consideration. For example, if someday your AI artist fearfully begs to not be turned off, what should you do?
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
(c) Philip Galanter, 2020
Copyright
For all articles published in Artnodes that are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence, copyright is retained by the author(s). The complete text the license can be consulted at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s).
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary licences for the images that are subject to copyright.
Assignment of intellectual property rights
The author non exclusively transfers the rights to use (reproduce, distribute, publicly broadcast or transform) and market the work, in full or part, to the journal’s editors in all present and future formats and modalities, in all languages, for the lifetime of the work and worldwide.
I hereby declare that I am the original author of the work. The editors shall thus not be held responsible for any obligation or legal action that may derive from the work submitted in terms of violation of third parties’ rights, whether intellectual property, trade secret or any other right.
Bekoff, Marc. The Emotional Lives of Animals: A Leading Scientist Explores Animal Joy, Sorrow, and Empathy - and Why They Matter. Novato, CA: New World Library, 2007.
Blackburn, Simon. "Ethics: A Very Short Introduction." In Very Short Introductions 80. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192804426.001.0001
Bostrom, Nick. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Bryson, Joanna J. "Robots should be slaves." In Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issues, 63-74. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.8.11bry
Carroll, Noël. 1999. Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction (Routledge Contemporary Introductions to Philosophy). New York: Routledge, 1999.
Chalmers, David John. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory (Philosophy of Mind Series). New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Choe, Il-Hwan, Junweon Byun, Ko Keun Kim, Sol Park, Isaac Kim, Jaeseung Jeong, and Hee-Sup Shin. "Mice in social conflict show rule-observance behavior enhancing long-term benefit." Nature Communications 8, no. 1 (2017): 1176. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01091-5
Coeckelbergh, Mark. AI Ethics, The MIT Press Essential Knowledge series. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12549.001.0001
D'Agostino, Fred, Gerald Gaus, and John Thrasher. "Contemporary Approaches to the Social Contract." 2020. Metaphysics Research Lab, accessed April 19. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/contractarianism-contemporary/.
Driver, Julia. "The History of Utilitarianism." 2014. Metaphysics Research Lab, accessed April 19. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/utilitarianism-history/. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139096737.009
Galanter, Philip. "What is Generative Art? Complexity theory as a context for art theory." International Conference on Generative Art, Milan, Italy, 2003.
Galanter, Philip. "Shot By Both Sides: Art-Science and the War Between Science and the Humanities." Artnodes: E-journal on Art, Science, and Technology 11, no. 1 (2011): 5.
Galanter, Philip. "Generative Art Theory." In A Companion to Digital Art, edited by Christiane Paul, 146-180. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2016a. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118475249.ch5
Galanter, Philip. "An introduction to complexism." Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research 14, nos. 1/2 (2016b): 9-31. https://doi.org/10.1386/tear.14.1-2.9_1
Galanter, Philip. "Machine Patiency and the Ethical Treatment of Artificial Intelligence Entities." xCoAx: the Conference on Computation, Communication, Aesthetics and X., Graz, Austria, July 2020.
Goff, Philip, William Seager, and Sean Allen-Hermanson. "Panpsychism." 2017. Metaphysics Research Lab, accessed April 19. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/panpsychism/. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119132363.ch8
Gowans, Chris. "Moral Relativism." 2019. Metaphysics Research Lab, accessed April 19. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/moral-relativism/.
Kant, Immanuel. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1950.
King, Barbara J. Personalities on the Plate: The Lives and Minds of Animals We Eat. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226195216.001.0001
Krupenye, Christopher, and Josep Call. "Theory of mind in animals: Current and future directions." WIREs Cognitive Science 10, no. 6 (2019): e1503. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1503.
Mueller, Paul S., C. Christopher Hook, and Kevin C. Fleming. "Ethical Issues in Geriatrics: A Guide for Clinicians." Mayo Clinic Proceedings 79, no. 4 (2004): 554-562. https://doi.org/10.4065/79.4.554.
Penrose, Roger. The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds and the Laws of Physics. Revised impression as Oxford Landmark Science. Ed. Oxford Landmark Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Still image.
Rachels, Stuart, and James Rachels. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. Ninth Edition. Ed. Dubuque, IA: McGraw-Hill Education, 2018.
Schlosser, Markus. "Agency." 2019. Metaphysics Research Lab, accessed April 19. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/agency/.
Schmelz, Martin, Sebastian Grueneisen, Alihan Kabalak, Jürgen Jost, and Michael Tomasello. "Chimpanzees return favors at a personal cost." 2017. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, no. 28: 7462-7467. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700351114
Shafer-Landau, Russ. A Concise Introduction to Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.
Singer, Peter. Ethics (Oxford Readers). New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
Singer, Peter. Animal Liberation: The Definitive Classic of the Animal Movement. Updated ed. New York: Ecco Book/Harper Perennial, 2009.
Smith, Justin E. H. Nature, Human Nature, and Human Difference: Race in Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton University Press, 2015.
Snow, C. P. The Two Cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819940
Sokal, Alan D., and J. Bricmont. Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science. New York: Picador USA, 1998.
Swabey, W. Curtis. "The Laws of Thought." The Philosophical Review 32, no. 2 (1923): 211-221. https://doi.org/10.2307/2178931
Tononi, Giulio, Melanie Boly, Marcello Massimini, and Christof Koch. "Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate." Nature Reviews Neuroscience 17, no. 7 (2016): 450-461. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.44
Warneken, Felix, and Michael Tomasello. "Altruistic Helping in Human Infants and Young Chimpanzees." Science 311, no. 5765 (2006): 1301-1303.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Philip Galanter, Shot By Both Sides: Art-Science And The War Between Science And The Humanities , Artnodes: No. 11: (November 2011). NODE 11. Hybrid Discourses (coord.: Pau Alsina)
Similar Articles
- Predrag Nikolić, Ruiyang Liu, Metaphysics of The Machines: From Human-Robot-Robot Interaction to AI Philosophers Abstraction , Artnodes: No. 28: (July 2021). NODE 28. In the limits of what is possible: art, science and technology (Guest Editors: Paloma Díaz, Andrea García)
- Predrag K. Nikolić, Giacomo Bertin, AI.R Taletorium: Artificial Intelligence 1001 Cyber Nights , Artnodes: No. 31: (January 2023). NODE 31. Possibles II (Editors: Pau Alsina & Andrés Burbano)
- Marcel René Marburger, Artistic intelligence vs. artificial intelligence , Artnodes: No. 34: (July 2024). NODE 34. Materiology and variantology: invitation to dialogue (guest editors: Siegfried Zielinski & Daniel Irrgang)
- Bruno Caldas Vianna, The Bartleby Machine: exploring creative disobedience in computers , Artnodes: No. 32: (July 2023). NODE 32. Possibles III (Editors: Pau Alsina & Andrés Burbano)
- Diego Díaz, Clara Boj, A critical approach to Machine Learning forecast capabilities: creating a predictive biography in the age of the Internet of Behaviour (IoB) , Artnodes: No. 31: (January 2023). NODE 31. Possibles II (Editors: Pau Alsina & Andrés Burbano)
- Hugo Felipe Idárraga, Identification, classification and control: close ties analysed in reference to artistic practices in the heart of artificial intelligence , Artnodes: No. 26: (July 2021). NODE 26. AI, Arts & Design: Questioning Learning Machines (Guest Editors: A. Burbano & R. West)
- Ruth West, Andres Burbano, AI, Arts & Design: Questioning Learning Machines , Artnodes: No. 26: (July 2021). NODE 26. AI, Arts & Design: Questioning Learning Machines (Guest Editors: A. Burbano & R. West)
- Pedro Rolando Apolo Valdivia, The future of the music industry in the era of artificial intelligence , Artnodes: No. 30
- Eitan Mendelowitz, Intelligent Environments and Public Art , Artnodes: No. 26: (July 2021). NODE 26. AI, Arts & Design: Questioning Learning Machines (Guest Editors: A. Burbano & R. West)
- Santiago Rementeria-Sanz, The aesthetic factor in the automation of logical tasks: The case of chess , Artnodes: No. 26: (July 2021). NODE 26. AI, Arts & Design: Questioning Learning Machines (Guest Editors: A. Burbano & R. West)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.