DIY Design and Radical Worldbuilding at The Grove Skatepark, London

Main Article Content

Tom Critchley

This paper presents an ethnographic case study of DIY design practices at a skatepark in London, UK. The skatepark is presented as an urban commons, offering a framework for DIY infrastructuring that contrasts top-down and inequitable urbanisation processes. Three key themes emerge from the fieldwork that demonstrate the capacities and limitations of DIY design. Firstly, DIY practices are viewed as “learning-by-doing”, wherein skateboarders not only learn how to construct a skatepark but also an array of vocational and soft skills. Here, DIY’s qualities of low barriers to participation, multidisciplinarity, and low risk of failure foreground a rich environment of vernacular knowledge exchange that underpins the research methodology of this paper utilising skatepark construction as object-orientated, research-through-design. Secondly, DIY design is found to support a community of practitioners that transcend the space as just a skatepark, incorporating a community garden, collaborative theatre project and arts-based workshops that transcend male-dominated histories of DIY skateboarding cultures. Here, Participatory Design (PD) notions of ‘infrastructuring’ mirror an emergent and open-ended design process that supports inclusive socio-material worldmaking. Thirdly, DIY design practices influence the ways in which the space is governed, in which there are found to be contradictory notions of “prefigurative politics.” Here, the space is argued to be inclusive and anarchic yet centres agency around notions of “core skateboarding” that reinforce masculine hegemonies. Collectively, this paper argues that DIY design has the potential to serve as a worldmaking agent underpinned by a unique set of values and modes which are well-suited to times of uncertainty, flux and crisis, yet highlights the necessity for critically engaging with the politics and practices of both DIY and skateboarding communities.   

Keywords
DIY design, skateboarding, infrastructuring, commoning, research-through-design, community, governance

Article Details

How to Cite
Critchley, Tom. “DIY Design and Radical Worldbuilding at The Grove Skatepark, London”. Temes de Disseny, no. 39, pp. 208-27, doi:10.46467/TdD39.2023.208-227.
Author Biography

Tom Critchley, Goldsmiths University of London

I am an interdisciplinary designer, researcher and academic. My background and interests are in politics, design, community activism, and skateboarding.  

I have been working on Mawja Radio since 2017 - a radio collective exploring audio production and sound media narratives within refugee and migration contexts in Jordan. I have also been working for the NGO Concrete Jungle Foundation since 2018, working with skate communities in the Global South to construct skateparks and implement youth development programming. 

I am currently a PhD researcher and Associate Lecturer in the Design Department at Goldsmiths University, London. My PhD explores Mawja Radio and the Concrete Jungle Foundation in terms of Science and Technology Studies’ engagements with infrastructures. My current research interests are DIY practices within skateboarding, skateboarding and Afrofuturism in Jamaica and farmers markets in London.  

Besides Goldsmiths, I have given lectures at Aarhus University in Denmark, the Manchester School of Architecture and the University of the Underground in Amsterdam. I enjoy exploring a combination of Scandinavian Participatory Design and DIY practices to encourage students to collaborate with communities and intervene in the city. I am also a resident at Balamii and Systems Radio, platforming my research interests within radio soundscapes. 

References

Abulhawa, Dani. 2020. Skateboarding and Femininity: Gender, Space-Making and Expressive Movement. Abingdon: Routledge.

Akbil, Emre, Alex Axinte, Esra Can, Beatrice De Carli, Melissa Harrison, Ana Méndez de Andés, Katharina Moebus, Thomas Moore, and Doina Petrescu. 2022. Urban Commons Handbook. Barcelona: dpr-barcelona.

Atencio, Matthew, and Becky Beal. 2016. “The ‘Legitimate Skateboarder:’ Politics of Private-Public Skateboarding Spaces.” In Skateboarding: Subcultures, Sites and Shifts, edited by Kara-Jane Lombard, 108-20. Abingdon: Routledge.

Atencio, Matthew, Becky Beal, and Charlene Wilson. 2009. “Distinction of Risk: Urban Skateboarding, Street Habitus, and the Construction of Hierarchical Gender Relations.” Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise 1, no. 1 (September): 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19398440802567907

Augé, Marc. 1992. Non-Places: An Introduction to Supermodernity. London: Verso Books.

Beachy, Kyle. 2018. “Primitive Progressivism.” Free Skateboard Magazine. https://www.freeskatemag.com/2018/06/05/primitive-progressivism-by-kyle-beachy/

Berlant, Lauren. 2016. “The Commons: Infrastructures for Troubling Times.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34, no. 3: 393-419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816645989

Björgvinsson, Erling, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2010. “Participatory Design and ‘Democratizing Innovation’”. In PDC ’10: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, Sydeny, Australia, November 2010, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900448.

Borden, Iain. 2001. Skateboarding, Space and the City: Architecture and the Body. Oxford: Berg Publishers.

Cherrington, Jim and Jack Black. 2022. “Introduction: sport and physical activity in catastrophic environments—tuning to the ‘weird’ and the ‘eerie.’” In Sport and Physical Activity in Catastrophic Environments. Oxford: Routledge.

Cottell, Josh, Klara Blazek, and Daniel Urquijo. 2022. “Levelling Up London: Borough by Borough Data Breakdown.” Available at: https://centreforlondon.org/publication/levelling-up-london-borough-stats/

Critchley, Tom. 2020. “DIY Skate Spots and Guerrilla Architecture: Challenging ’Non-Places’ in Great London.” Confusion Magazine. https://www.confuzine.com/2020/09/27/diy-skate-spots-and-guerrilla-architecture-challenging-non-places-in-greater-london/

Cross, Nigel. 1999. “Design Research: A Disciplined Conversation.” Design Issues 15, no. 2: 5-10. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511837

DiSalvo, Carl. 2016. “Design and Prefigurative Politics.” The Journal of Design Strategies 8, no. 1: 29-35. Available at: https://issuu.com/journalofdesignstrategies/docs/the_journal_of_design_strategies_vo

Estalella, Adolfo, and Tomás Sánchez Criado. 2018. Experimental Collaborations: Ethnography Through Fieldwork Devices. Oxford: Berghahn Books.

Fisher, Mark. 2016. The Weird and the Eerie. New York: Repeater Books.

Flynn, Jerry. 2016. “Complete Control: Developers, Financial Viability and Regeneration at the Elephant and Castle.” City 20, no. 2 (April): 278-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2016.1143685

Hardin, Garrett. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162: 1243–1248.

Harvey, David. 2012. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso.

Healy, Liam. 2021. “Designing Unlikely Futures? A/Symmetry and A-Firmative Speculation in the European Boarderscape.” PhD diss., Goldsmiths University of London. Available at: https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/30218/

Healy, Liam, and Peter Gall Krogh. 2022. “Emergent Participation in DIY Designed Bike Trails.” In Proceedings of the 17th Participatory Design Conference: Embracing Cosmologies: Expanding Worlds of Participatory Design, Newcastle, August 19—September 2. Available at: https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/32086/1/pdc2022vol2-17.pdf

Hector, Philip, and Andrea Botero. 2021. “Generative Repair: Everyday Infrastructuring between DIY Citizen Initiatives and Institutional Arrangements.” International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 18, no. 4: 399-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2021.1912778

Hine, Christine. 2007. “Multi-sited Ethnography as a Middle Range Methodology for Contemporary STS.” Science, Technology & Human Values 32, no. 6 (November): 652-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907303598

Howell, Ocean. 2005. “The ‘Creative Class’ and the Gentrifying City: Skateboarding in Philadelphia’s Love Park.” Journal of Architectural Education 59, no. 2: 32-42. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40480609

Howell, Ocean. 2008. “Skatepark as Neoliberal Playground: Urban Governance, Recreation Space, and the Cultivation of Personal Responsibility.” Space and Culture 11, no. 4: 475-496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331208320488

Joost, Gesche, and Andreas Unteidig. 2015. “Design and Social Change: The Changing Environment of a Discipline in Flux.” In Transformation Design: Perspectives on a New Design Attitude, edited by Wolfgang Jonas, Sarah Zzerwas, and Kristof von Anshelm, 134-48. Basel: Birkhäuser.

Jungnickel, Kat. 2018. “Making Things to Make Sense of Things: DIY as Research and Practice.” In The Routledge Companion to Media Studies and Digital Humanities, edited by Jentery Sayers, 492–502. Abingdon: Routledge.

Karasti, Helena. 2014. “Infrastructuring in Participatory Design.” In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers – Volume 1, New York: 141-150. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661435.2661450

Kyrönviita, Mikko, and Antti Wallin. 2022. “Building a DIY Skatepark and Doing Politics Hands-On.” City 26, no. 4 (June): 646-663. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2022.2079879

Kuznetsov, Stacey, and Eric Paulos. 2010. “Rise of the Expert Amateur: DIY Projects, Communities, and Cultures.” In NordiCHI '10: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, Reykjavik, Iceland. October 2010, 295-304. https://doi/10.1145/1868914.1868950

Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.

Law, John, and Evelyn Ruppert. 2013. “The Social Life of Methods: Devices.” Journal of Cultural Economy 6, no. 3 (July): 229-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2013.812042

Linebaugh, Peter. 2009. The Magna Carta Manifesto: Liberties and Commons for All. California: University of California Press.

Lury, Celia, and Nina Wakeford. 2012. Inventive Methods: Happenings of the Social. London: Routledge.

Lugones, María. 2010. “Toward a Decolonial Feminism.” Hypatia 25, no. 4: 742-759. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40928654

Mäkelä, Maarit. 2007. “Knowing Through Making: The Role of the Artefact in Practice-led Research.” Knowledge, Technology & Policy 20, no.1: 157-163. https://doi.10.1007/s12130-007-9028-2

McCormick, Carlo, 2004. “The Beaten Path.” In Beautiful Losers: Contemporary Art and Street Culture, edited by Aaron Rose and Christian Strike, 73-80. New York: Iconoclast and Distributed Art Publishers.

O’Connor, Paul. 2016 “Skateboard Philanthropy: Inclusion and Prefigurative Politics.” In Skateboarding: Subcultures, Sites and Shifts, edited by Kara-Jane Lombard, 30-44. Abington: Routledge.

Sendra, Pablo, and Richard Sennett. 2022. Designing Disorder: Experiments and Disruptions in the City. London: Verso.

Stavrides, Stavros. 2015. “Commons Space as Threshold Space: Urban Commoning in Struggles to Re-appropriate Public Space.” Footprint: Delft Architecture Theory Journal. 9, No. 1: 9-20. https://doi.org/10.7480/footpring.9.1.896.

Stengers, Isabelle. 2015. In Catastrophic Times: Resisting the Coming Barbarianism. Translated by Andrew Goffey. Paris: Open Humanities Press.

Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.