Lliure per a tots? El coneixement com a barrera per a les comunitats tecnopolítiques a Espanya
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Visions optimistes del seu potencial alliberador han acompanyat internet des dels seus inicis. No obstant això, les comunitats tecnopolítiques han defensat el coneixement lliure, però corren el risc d’adoptar nocions liberals quan hi ha una jerarquia grupal dependent de les capacitats tecnològiques o del temps que les persones inverteixin en un projecte (Coleman i Golub, 2008; Crabu et al., 2016). Mitjançant una metodologia combinada, cerquem comprendre els processos de presa de decisions i de formació de les comunitats tecnopolítiques a Espanya. Els resultats demostren que aquests projectes són col·lectius, i que les seves comunitats estan alineades amb la disponibilitat de materials públics a internet per a l’aprenentatge individual i els valors de suport mutu. No obstant això, han de considerar el desenvolupament d’estratègies de formació i de la presa de decisions més ben establertes per atreure més persones i perfils més diversos. Si no és així, corren el risc de generar una elit d’experts que poden gaudir del coneixement lliure, però que no poden col·lectivitzar-lo de manera efectiva i alterar el context del capitalisme informacional.
Paraules clau:
Article Details
Aquesta obra està sota una llicència internacional Creative Commons Reconeixement 4.0.
(c) Dafne Calvo, Eva Campos-Domínguez, 2022
Drets d'autor
Els continguts publicats a Digithum estan subjectes a una llicència Reconeixement 4.0 Internacional de Creative Commons, el text complet de la qual es pot consultar a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, l'autor/a reté el copyright. Així doncs, es permet la còpia, distribució, comunicació pública, obres derivades i usos comercials dels continguts de la revista sempre que se'n citi la font (Digithum), l'autor de l'article i la institució que els publica (UOC, UdeA), tal com consta en la citació recomanada inclosa en cada article.
És responsabilitat dels autors obtenir els permisos necessaris de les imatges que estiguin subjectes a Copyright.
Cessió de drets de propietat intel·lectual
L’autor cedeix sense exclusiva als editors de la revista els drets d’explotació (reproducció, distribució, comunicació pública i transformació) per a explotar i comercialitzar l’obra, sencera o en part, en tots els formats i modalitats d’explotació presents o futurs, en tots els idiomes, per tot el període de vida de l’obra i per tot el món.
Declaro que sóc l’autor original de l’obra. Els editors queden, per tant, exonerats de qualsevol obligació o responsabilitat per qualsevol acció legal que es pugui suscitar derivada de l’obra dipositada per la vulneració de drets de tercers, siguin de propietat intel·lectual o industrial, de secret comercial o qualsevol altre.
Referències
ÁLVAREZ PEDROSIAN, E. (2014). “Lo urbano como laboratorio para la exploración transdiciplinaria”. In: Cartografía de territorios y territorialidades. Un ejercicio de integralidad en el encuentro de la geografía humana y la antropología de la comunicación. Montevideo: Espacio Interdisciplinario de la Universidad de la República, pp. 17-28.
ALLAHO, M. Y.; LEE, W. C. (2015). “Analyzing the Social Networks of Contributors in Open Source Software Community”. In: Kazienko P.; Chawla N. (eds.). Applications of Social Media and Social Network Analysis, pp. 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19003-7_4
ARRIBAS, M. (2004). “Diseño y validación de cuestionarios”. Matronas Profesión, vol. 5, no. 17, pp. 23–29.
BALALI, S.; STEINMACHER, I.; ANNAMALAI, U.; SARMA, A.; GEROSA, M. A. (2018). “Newcomers’ Barriers... Is That All? An Analysis of Mentors’ and Newcomers’ Barriers in OSS Projects”. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 27, pp. 679-714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9310-8
BARCELLINI, F.; DÉTIENNE, F.; BURKHARDT, J. M. (2008). “User and developer mediation in an Open Source Software community: Boundary spanning through cross participation in online discussions”. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 558-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.10.008
BARCELLINI, F.; DÉTIENNE, F.; BURKHARDT, J. M. (2014). “A situated approach of roles and participation in open source software communities”. Human-Computer interaction, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 205-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2013.812409
BENKLER, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
BENKLER, Y.; NISSENBAUM, H. (2006). “Commons-based Peer Production and Virtue”. Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 394-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00235.x
BIRKINBINE, B.; GOMEZ, R.; WASKO, J. (2016). The Global Media Giant. The nine firms that dominate the world. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315682334
CAI, Y.; ZHU, D. (2016). “Reputation in an open source software community: Antecedents and impacts”. Decision Support Systems, vol. 91, pp. 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2016.08.004
CANDÓN-MENA, J.; MONTERO-SÁNCHEZ, D. (2021). “From Cyber-Activism to Technopolitics: A Critical Take on Historical Periods and Orientations in the Use of Digital Technology by Social Movements”. International Journal of Communication, vol. 15, pp. 2921 2941
CARILLO, K.; HUFF, S.; CHAWNER, B. (2017). “What makes a good contributor? Understanding contributor behavior within large Free/Open Source Software projects – A socialization perspective”. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 322-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.03.001
CARR, N. (2008). El gran interruptor. El mundo en red, de Edison a Google. Barcelona: Ediciones Deusto.
CASTELLS, M. (2008). “Comunicación, poder y contrapoder en la sociedad red (I). Los medios y la política”. Telos, no. 74.
CASTELLS, M. (2012). Redes de indignación y esperanza. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
CHRISTL, W.; SPIEKERMANN, S. (2016). Networks of Control. A Report on Corporate Surveillance, Digital Tracking, Big Data & Privacy. Viena: Facultas.
COLEMAN, G. (2011). “Hacker Politics and Publics”. Public Culture, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 511-516. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-1336390
COLEMAN, G.; GOLUB, A. (2008). “Hacker practice: Moral genres and the cultural articulation of liberalism”. Anthropological Theory, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 255-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499608093814
COSTANZA-CHOCK, S. (2018). “Design Justice: towards an intersectional feminist framework for design theory and practice”. Design Research Society: Catalyst, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.679
COX, A. (1998). “Cathedrals, bazaars and the town council”. Slashdot [online article]. Available at: https://news.slashdot.org/story/98/10/13/1423253/featurecathedrals-bazaars-and-the-town-council. [Accessed: 01/03/21].
CRABU, S.; GIOVANELLA, F.; MACCARI, L.; MAGAUDDA, P. (2016). “Hacktivism, Infrastructures and Legal Frameworks in Community Networks: The Italian Case of Ninux”. Journal of Peer Production, no. 9 [online article]. Available at: http://peerproduction.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/the-case-of-ninux.org-draft.pdf [Accessed: 01/03/21].
CROWSTON, K.; HOWISON, J. (2003). “The Social Structure of Open Source Software Development Teams”. School of Information Studies - Faculty Scholarship, vol. 123, pp. 1-20.
CROWSTON, K.; HOWISON, J. (2006). “Hierarchy and Centralization in Free and Open Source Software Team Communications”. Knowledge, Technology, & Policy, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 65-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-006-1004-8
CUESTA, M.; FONT FÁBREGAS, J.; GANUZA, E.; GÓMEZ, B.; PASADAS, S. (2008). Encuesta deliberativa. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
DAHLBERG, L.; SIAPERA, E. (2007). “Introduction: Tracing Radical Democracy and the Internet”. In: Dahlberg L.; Siapera E. (eds.). Radical Democracy and the Internet. Interrogating Theory and Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592469_1
FIRER-BLAESS, S.; FUCHS, C. (2014). “Wikipedia: An info-communist manifesto”. Television and New Media, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476412450193
FLICK, U. (2014). La gestión de la calidad en Investigación Cualitativa. Madrid: Morata.
FUCHS, C. (2016). Critical Theory of Communication: New Readings of Lukács, Adorno, Marcuse, Honneth and Habermas in the Age of the Internet. London: University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book1
FUSTER MORELL, M. (2011). “An introductory historical contextualization of online creation communities for the building of digital commons: The emergence of a free culture movement”. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 739.
GALDÓN CORBELLA, C. (2018). “Cosmovisiones feministas en clave generacional. Del movimiento 15M a la Huelga Feminista del 8M”. Encrucijadas - Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales, vol. 16 [online article]. Available at: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/encrucijadas/article/view/79175. [Accessed: 01/03/21].
GARZARELLI, G.; GALOPPINI, R. (2002). “Capability Coordination in Modular Organization: Voluntary FS/OSS Production and the Case of Debian GNU/Linux”. In: 2002 DRUID Summer Conference. Copenhage.
GHOSH, R. A. (2005). “Understanding free software developers: Findings from the FLOSS study”. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software, pp. 23-46.
GHOSH, R. A.; GLOTT, R.; KRIEGER, B.; ROBLES, G. (2002). Free/libre and open source software: Survey and study (FLOSS Final Report Part 4). Maastricht.
GIURI, P.; RULLANI, F.; TORRISI, S. (2008). “Explaining leadership in virtual teams: The case of open source software”. Information Economics and Policy, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.06.002
GLADWELL, M.; SHIRKY, C. (2011). “From innovation to revolution-do social media made protests possible: An absence of evidence”. Foreign Affairs, vol. 90, no. 153.
GUTIERREZ, M.; MILAN, S. (2017). “Technopolitics in the Age of Big Data: The Rise of Proactive Data Activism in Latin America”. In: SIERRA CABALLERO, F.; GRAVANTE, T. Networks, Movements & Technopolitics in Latin America: Critical Analysis and Current Challenges. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 1 17.
HACHÉ, A. (2014). “Technological sovereignty”. In: For Free Information and Open InternetIndependent journalists, community media and hacktivists take action. París: Ritimo. pp. 165 172.
HANNEBAUER, C.; GRUHN, V. (2016). “Motivation of newcomers to FLOSS projects”. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, OpenSym 2016. Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957792.2957793
HIMANEN, P. (2002). La ética del hacker y el espíritu de la Era de la información. Barcelona: Imagino destino.
HECHT, G. (2001). “Technology, politics, and national identity in France”. In THAD, M. A.; HECHT G. Technologies of Power: Essays in Honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 253-294.
JACKSON, S. K.; KUEHN, K. M. (2016). “Open Source, Social Activism and ‘Necessary Trade-offs’ in the Digital Enclosure: A Case Study of Platform Co-operative, Loomio.org”. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 413-427. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v14i2.764
JORDAN, T. (2017). “A genealogy of hacking”. Convergence, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 528-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856516640710
KELLNER, D. (2007). “Globalisation, Technopolitics and Revolution”. Theoria, vol. 48, no. 98, pp. 14 34. https://doi.org/10.3167/004058101782485520
KELTY, C. M. (2008). Two bits: the cultural significance of free software. Stanford: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01725_19.x
KONIECZNY, P. (2017). “Adhocratic Governance in the Internet Age : A Case of Wikipedia”. Journal of Information Technology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 263-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2010.489408
KRISHNAMURTHY, S. (2002). “Cave or Community? An Empirical Examination of 100 Mature Open Source Projetcs”. First Monday, vol. 2, no. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i6.960
LAM, S. T. K.; KARIM, J.; RIEDL, J. (2010). “The Effects of Group Composition on Decision Quality in a Social Production Community”. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on Supporting group work, pp. 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1145/1880071.1880083
LERNER, J.; TIROLE, J. (2000). “The simple economics of open source”. NBER Working Paper. Boston. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7600
LEVY, S. (1994). Hackers. Heroes of the Computer Revolution. New York: Dell Publishing.
LIN, Y. (2004). “Contextualizing knowledge–making in Linux user groups”. First Monday, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v9i11.1187
LONG, Y.; SIAU, K. (2007). “Social Network Structures in Open Source Software Development Teams”. Journal of Database Management, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 2-5. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdm.2007040102
MANZEROLLE, V.; SMELTZER, S. (2011). “Consumer Databases, Neoliberalism, and the Commercial Mediation of Identity: A Medium Theory Analysis”. Surveillance & Society, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 323-337. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v8i3.4167
MARKUS, M. L. (2007). “The governance of free/open source software projects: Monolithic, multidimensional, or configurational?”. Journal of Management and Governance, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-007-9021-x
MATEOS-GARCIA, J.; STEINMUELLER, W. E. (2008). “The institutions of open source software: Examining the Debian community”. Information Economics and Policy, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 333-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.06.001
MCCHESNEY, R. W. (2015). Desconexión Digital. Cómo el capitalismo está poniendo a internet en contra de la democracia. Barcelona: El Viejo Topo.
MILAN, S.; TRERÉ, E. (2019). “Big Data from the South(s): Beyond Data Universalism”. Television and New Media, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 319-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419837739
MILBERRY, K.; ANDERSON, S. (2009). “Open Sourcing Our Way to an Online Commons”. Journal of Communication Inquiry, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 393 412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859909340349.
MOROZOV. (2018). Capitalismo Big Tech Welfare o neofeudalismo digital. Madrid: Enclave.
NAFUS, D. (2012). “Patches don’t have gender: What is not open in open source software”. New Media and Society, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 669-683. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811422887
O’MAHONY, S. (2007). “The governance of open source initiatives: What does it mean to be community managed?”. Journal of Management and Governance, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-007-9024-7
O’MAHONY, S.; FERRARO, F. (2007). “The emergence of governance in an open source community”. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1079-1106. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.27169153
OSTROM, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: the Evaluation of Institutions and Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763
POWELL, W. E.; HUNSINGER, D. S.; MEDLIN, B. D. (2010). “Gender differences within the open source community: an exploratory study”. Journal of Information Technology, vol. XXI, no. 4, pp. 29-37.
PRATTICO, L. (2012). “Governance of Open Source Software Foundations: Who Holds the Power?”. Technology Innovation Management Review, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 37-42. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview636
RAYMOND, E. (1999). “The Cathedral and the Bazaar”. Knowledge, Technology & Policy & Policy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 23-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-999-1026-0
REAGLE, J. (2013). “Free as in sexist? Free culture and the gender gap”. First Monday, vol. 18, no. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i1.4291
RUIZ OLABUÉNAGA, J. I. (2012). Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Bilbao: Deusto.
SÁDABA, I.; GORDO, Á. (2011). “La indolencia tecnopolítica de las ciencias sociales”. Viento Sur, no. 117, pp. 76 82.
SADOWSKI, B. M.; SADOWSKI-RASTERS, G.; DUYSTERS, G. (2008). “Transition of governance in a mature open software source community: Evidence from the Debian case”. Information Economics and Policy, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 323-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.05.001
SAMPEDRO BLANCO, V. (2018). Dietética digital. Para adelgazar al gran hermano. Barcelona: Icaria.
SHAH, S. K. (2006). “Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development”. Management Science, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1000-1014. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0553
SIERRA CABALLERO, F. (2018). “Ciberactivismo y movimientos sociales. El espacio público oposicional en la tecnopolítica contemporánea”. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, vol. 73, no. 980-990. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2018-1292
TRÉGUER, F.; ANTONIADIS, P.; SÖDERBERG, J. (2016). “Alt. vs. Ctrl.: Editorial notes for the JoPP issue on Alternative Internets”. Journal of Peer Production, no. 9.
VALLES, M. S. (2002). Entrevistas cualitativas. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (Colección Cuadernos metodológicos, vol. 32).
VILLASANTE, T. R. (2017). Democracias transformadoras. Experiencias emergentes y alternativas desde los comunes. Barcelona: El viejo topo.
WANG, J.; SARMA, A. (2011). “Which bug should I fix: Helping new developers onboard a new project”. In: CHASE 2011 - Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, Co-located with ICSE 2011, pp. 76-79. https://doi.org/10.1145/1984642.1984661
WEI, K.; CROWSTON, K.; ESERYEL, U. Y.; HECKMAN, R. (2017). “Roles and politeness behavior in community-based free/libre open source software development”. Information and Management, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 573-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.11.006
WOOLLEY, A. W.; CHABRIS, C. F.; PENTLAND, A.; HASHMI, N.; MALONE, T. W. (2010, October). “Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups”. Science, vol. 330, no. 6004, pp. 686-689. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193147
ZUBOFF, S. (2015). “Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization”. Journal of Information Technology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015