Com citar
Resum
La política tradicionalment ha mirat l’exercici de la democràcia, com a mínim, amb dos supòsits implícits: (1) les institucions són el canal normal de la política i (2) la votació és el canal normal de la política per prendre decisions. Per descomptat, la realitat és més complexa, però totes les extensions d’aquest model al voltant de la votació es basen en les institucions com a l’eix central entorn al qual gira la política. En aquest treball volem qüestionar aquesta manera d’entendre la política com una acció proactiva i conscient, i proposar en el seu lloc una forma reactiva i inconscient de fer política, basada en petites contribucions. En el nostre enfocament teòric s’argumenta que les pràctiques de mitjans socials són “política informal”, i que els qui han de prendre les decisions polítiques les poden convertir en política real. Si són capaços d’escoltar. Si són capaços de pensar en la política fora de les institucions i en temps real.Paraules clau
Referències
Anduiza, E., Cristancho, C. & Cantijoch, M. (2012). “La exposición a información política a través de Internet”. Dins: Arbor. Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura, 188 (756), 673-688. Berkeley: Berkeley Electronic Press. http://arbor.revistas.csic.es/index.php/arbor/article/viewFile/1493/1504
Augé, M. (2000). Sobremodernidad. Del mundo de hoy al mundo de mañana. [online]: Memoria. http://www.memoria.com.mx/129/auge.htm
Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New HavDins: Yale University Press.
Borge, R. & Cardenal, A. S. (2012). “Surfing the Net: A Pathway to Participation for the Politically Uninterested?”. Dins: Policy & Internet, 3 (1). Berkeley: Berkeley Electronic Press. http://www.psocommons.org/polic-yandinternet/vol3/iss1/art3
Breindl, Y. & Gustafsson, N. (2011). “Leetocracy: Networked Political Activism or the Continuation of Elitism in Competitive Democracy”. Dins: D. Araya, Y. Breindl, Y. & T.J. Houghton (Eds.), Nexus: New Intersections in Internet Research, Chapter 9, 193-212. New York: Peter Lang.
Breindl, Y. (2012). “The Dynamics of Participation and Organisation in European Digital Rights Campaigning”. Dins: eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 4 (1), 24-44. Krems: Danube-University Krems. http://www.jedem.org/article/view/96
Cantijoch, M. (2009). Reinforcement and mobilization: the influence of the Internet on different types of political participation. Seminario Citizen Politics: Are the New Media Reshaping Political Engagement? Barcelona, May 28th-30th 2009. Barcelona: IGOP
Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Castells, M. (2012). Redes de indignación y esperanza. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Christensen, H. S. (2011). “Political activities on the Internet: Slacktivism or political participation by other means?”. Dins: First Monday, February 2011, 16 (2). [online]: First Monday. http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3336/2767
Colombo, C., Galais, C. & Gallego, A. (2012). “El uso de Internet y las actitudes políticas. Datos cuantitativos y cualitativos de España”. Dins: Arbor. Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura, 188 (756), 751-766. Berkeley: Berkeley Electronic Press. http://arbor.revistas.csic.es/index.php/arbor/article/viewFile/1498/1509
De Marco, S. & Robles Morales, J. M. (2012). “Uso de los blogs políticos: análisis de algunos factores determinantes”. Dins: Arbor. Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura, 188 (756), 689-705. Berkeley: Berkeley Electronic Press. http://arbor.revistas.csic.es/index.php/arbor/article/view/1494
Echeverría, J. (1999). Los Señores del aire: Telépolis y el Tercer Entorno. Barcelona: Destino.
Esty, D. C. & Rushing, R. (2007). Governing by the Numbers: The Promise of Data-Driven Policymaking in the Information Age Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. http://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2007/04/pdf/data_driven_policy_report.pdf
Fernández Prados, J. S. (2012). “Ciberactivismo: conceptualización, hipótesis y medida”. Dins: Arbor. Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura, 188 (756), 631-639. Berkeley: Berkeley Electronic Press. http://arbor.revistas.csic.es/index.php/arbor/article/view/1490
Font, J., Navarro, C., Wojcieszak, M. & Alarcón, P. (2012). ¿”Democracia sigilosa” en España? Preferencias de la ciudadanía española sobre las formas de decisión política y sus factores explicativos. Opiniones y actitudes, nº 71. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. http://libreria.cis.es/static/pdf/OA71acc.pdf
Frias-Martinez, V., Virseda, J., Rubio, A. & Frias-Martinez, E. (2010). “Towards Large Scale Technology Impact Analyses: Automatic Residential Localization from Mobile Phone-Call Data”. Dins: Proceedings of ICTD 2010. 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. London: IEEE. http://www.gg.rhul.ac.uk/ict4d/ictd2010/posters/ICTD2010
Frias-Martinez et al.pdfFuster, M. & Subirats, J. (2012). “Crisis de representación y de participación. ¿Son las comunidades virtuales nuevas formas de agregación y participación ciudadana?”. Dins: Arbor. Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura, 188(756), 641-656. Berkeley: Berkeley Electronic Press. http://arbor.revistas.csic.es/index.php/arbor/article/view/1491
Hibbing, J. R. & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Himanen, P. (2003). L’ètica hacker i l’esperit de l’era de la informació. Barcelona: Editorial UOC
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hirschman, A. O. (1991). The Rhetoric of Reaction. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Horrigan, J. B., Garrett, R.K. & Resnick, P. (2004). The internet and democratic debate Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/Socie-ty_and_the_Internet/Pew_Internet_political_info_report_1004.pdf
Inglehart, R. (2008). “Changing Values among Western Publics from 1970 to 2006”. Dins: West European Politics, January–March 2008, 31 (1-2), 130–146. London: Routledge. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs/articles/folder_published/publica-tion_559/files/values_1970-2006.pdf
Johnson, S. (2001). Emergence. The connected lives of Ants, Brains, Cities and Software. London: Penguin Books.
Kelly, J., Fisher, D. & Smith, M. (2005). Debate, Division, and Diversity: Political Discourse Networks in USENET Newsgroups Paper prepared for the Online Deliberation Conference 2005. Palo Alto: Stanford University. http://www.coi.columbia.edu/pdf/kelly_fisher_smith_ddd.pdf
Kelly, J. (2008). Pride of Place: Mainstream Media and the Networked Public Sphere Media Re:public Side Papers. Cambridge: Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University. http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/Pride of Place_MR.pdf
Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. & Graepel, T. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior Washington, DC: Stanford University’s HighWire Press. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1218772110
Lanier, J. (2010). You are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto. London: Allen Lane.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of space. Oxford. Blackwell.
Martínez Roldán, S. (2011). Movimiento 15M: construcción del espacio urbano a través de la acción de las Multitudes Inteligentes Barcelona: UOC. http://openaccess.uoc.edu/webapps/o2/bitstream/10609/8582/1/smar-tinezrol_TFM_0711.pdf
Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion. The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: Public Affairs.
Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here. The folly of technologycal solutionism. New York: PublicAffairs.
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J. & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital Citizenship. The Internet, society and participation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Negroponte, N. (1995). Being Digital. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Nonneke, B. & Preece, J. (2003). “Silent Participants: Getting to Know Lurkers Better”. Dins: C. Lueg, C. & D. Fisher, From Usenet to CoWebs: Interacting with Social Information Spaces, Chapter 6, 110-132. London: Springer.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Noveck, B. S. (2005). “A democracy of groups”. Dins: First Monday, 10(11). [online]: First Monday. http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1289/1209
Obar, J. A., Zube, P. & Lampe, C. (2012). “Advocacy 2.0: An Analysis of How Advocacy Groups in the United States Perceive and Use Social Media as Tools for Facilitating Civic Engagement and Collective Action”. Dins: Journal of Information Policy, 2, 1-25. [online]: Pennsylvania State Univer-sity. http://jip.vmhost.psu.edu/ojs/index.php/jip/article/view/80Ogilvy
Public Relations Worldwide & Center for Social Impact Communication at Georgetown University (2011). Dynamics of Cause Engagement Arlington: Georgetown University. http://csic.georgetown.edu/research/215767.html
Padró-Solanet, A. (2010). Internet and Votes: The Impact of New ICTs in the 2008 Spanish Parliamentary Elections. Communication presented at the Internet, Politics, Policy 2010: An Impact Assessment conference, 16-17 September 2010. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.
Peña-López, I. (2011). “The disempowering Goverati: e-Aristocrats or the Delusion of e-Democracy”. Dins: eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 3 (1), 1-21. Krems: Danube-University Krems. http://www.jedem.org/article/view/50
Peña-López, I., Congosto, M. & Aragón, P. (2013). “Spanish Indignados and the evolution of 15M: towards networked parainstitutions”. Dins: A. Cerrillo i Martínez et al. (Coords.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Internet, Law & Politics. Barcelona: UOC
Rainie, L., Purcell, K. & Smith, A. (2011). The social side of the internet. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewin-ternet.org/Reports/2011/The-Social-Side-of-the-Internet.aspx
Rieder, B. (2012). “The refraction chamber: Twitter as sphere and network”. Dins: First Monday, November 2012, 17 (11). [online]: First Monday. http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4199/3359
Robles Morales, J. M., Molina Molina, Ó. & De Marco, S. (2012). “Participación política digital y brech digital política en España. Un estudio de las desigualdades digitales”. Dins: Arbor. Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura, 188(756), 795-810. Berkeley: Berkeley Electronic Press. http://arbor.revistas.csic.es/index.php/arbor/article/view/1501
Ruiz de Querol, R. & Kappler, K. (2013). Looking for the Social Hackers. [mimeo].
Sádaba, I. (2012). “Participación política digital y brech digital política en España. Un estudio de las desigualdades digitales”. Dins: Arbor. Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura, 188 (756), 781-794. Berkeley: Berkeley Electronic Press. http://arbor.revistas.csic.es/index.php/arbor/article/view/1500
Signorini, A., Segre, A. M. & Polgreen, P. M. (2011). “The Use of Twitter to Track Levels of Disease Activity and Public Concern in the U.S. during the Influenza A H1N1 Pandemic”. Dins: PLOS ONE, 6 (5), e19467. San Francisco: Public Library of Science. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0019467
Smith, A. (2013). Civic Engagement in the Digital Age Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Civic-Engagement.aspx
Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A. & Olien, C. N. (1970). “Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge”. Dins: Public Opinion Quarterly, 34 (2), 159 - 170. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures”. Dins: Journal of Political Economy, 64 (5), 416-424. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Watts, D. J. & Dodds, P. S. (2007). Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Welzel, C., Inglehart, R. & Klingemann, H. (2003). “The theory of human development: A cross-cultural analysis”. Dins: European Jo-urnal of Political Research, 42 (3), 341-379. Oxford: Blackwell. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1475-6765.00086
Drets
Drets d'autor
Educació social. Revista d'intervenció socioeducativa es publica en accés obert sota la llicència Creative commons reconeixement-nocomercial (by-nc): es permet l’ús del seu contingut sempre que se citi l’autor o l’autora i la publicació, amb la seva adreça electrònica exacta. Es permet la generació d’obres derivades sempre que no se’n faci un ús comercial. Tampoc no es pot utilitzar l’obra original amb finalitats comercials.
El copyright © de la revista pertany a la Facultat d'Educació Social i Treball Social Pere Tarrés. Universitat Ramon Llull