Contractarian business ethics: A rational morality approach
Article Sidebar
Citacions a Google Acadèmic
Main Article Content
Abstract: Contractarian business ethics approaches are dominated by the application of Rawlsian premises to practical, business-related issues, where moral principles serve as constraints on firm behavior and its attempts to maximize profit. A contractarian theory of business ethics that is based on rationality addresses the tension between moral premises and self-interested profit maximization by showing that moral principles can be the outcome of rational interactions. In the present paper, I examine the extent to which rational morality can reinforce business ethics by incorporating moral considerations in the corporation’s profit maximization functions and thus, strengthen the argument for business ethics as complimentary, not constraining, to business operations. The sole responsibility of a business is indeed to maximize its profits.
Article Details
Binmore, K. (1994) Game Theory and the Social Contract. Playing Fair v. 1. MIT Press.
Broome, J. (1999) Ethics out of Economics. Cambridge England; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Buchanan, J.M. (1975). A Contractarian Paradigm for Applying Economic Theory. The Ameri-can Economic Review, 65(2), 225–230.
Chang, H.-J. (2014) Economics: The User’s Guide: A Pelican Introduction. London: Pelican.
Cudd, A.E. (1996). Is Pareto Optimality a Criterion of Justice? Social Theory and Practice, 22(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract199622116
Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T.W. (1999) Ties that Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Busi-ness Ethics. Harvard Business Press.
Dunfee, T.W. (2006). A Critical Perspective of Integrative Social Contracts Theory: Recurring Criti-cisms and Next Generation Research Topics. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(3), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9016-6.
French, P.A. (1979). The Corporation as a Moral Person. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16(3), pp. 207–215.
Friedman, M. (1970) The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. Availa-ble at: http://www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman-soc-resp-business.html (Accessed: 4 August 2015).
Gauthier, D. (1979). David Hume, Contractarian. The Philosophical Review, 88(1), 3–38.
Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gert, B. and Gert, J. (2020). The Definition of Morality. In E.N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Ency-clopedia of Philosophy. Fall 2020. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/morality-definition/ (Ac-cessed: 20 November 2022).
Hausman, D. (1989). Are Markets Morally Free Zones? Philosophy and Public Affairs, (18), pp. 317–33.
Heath, J. (2009). The Uses and Abuses of Agency Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(4), 497–528. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200919430.
Heath, J., Moriarty, J. and Norman, W. (2010). Business Ethics and (or as) Political Philosophy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(03), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201020329.
Hobbes, T. (1976). Leviathan. London: Forgotten Books.
Hsieh, N. (2008). Survey article: Justice in production. Journal of Political Philosophy, 16(1), 72–100.
Khalil, E.L. (2015). The Fellow-Feeling Paradox: Hume, Smith and the Moral Order. Philosophy, 90(04), 653–678. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819115000339.
Luetge, C. (ed.) (2013). Handbook of the philosophical foundations of business ethics. Dor-drecht: Springer (Springer reference.).
Marcoux, A. (2008). Business Ethics. In E.N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philoso-phy. Fall 2008. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/ethics-business/ (Accessed: 9 July 2015).
Moriarty, J. (2005). On the Relevance of Political Philosophy to Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3), 455–473.
Nagel, T. (1989) The View From Nowhere. New Ed edition. New York: Oxford University Press, U.S.A.
Néron, P.-Y. (2015). Rethinking the Very Idea of Egalitarian Markets and Corporations: Why Rela-tionships Might Matter More than Distribution. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(1), 93–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2015.7
Norman, W. (2015). Rawls on Markets and Corporate Governance. Business Ethics Quarter-ly, 25(1), 29–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2015.16
O’Neill, M. (2008a). Three Rawlsian routes towards economic democracy. Revue de philosophie économique, 9(1), 29–55
Sidgwick, H. (1907). The Methods Of Ethics. Hackett.
Singer, A. (2015). There Is No Rawlsian Theory of Corporate Governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(1), 65–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2015.1.
Skyrms, B. (2004). The stag hunt and the evolution of social structure. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
Smith, A. (2014). The Wealth of Nations. Charleston: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Thompson, C. (2020). Ideal and Nonideal Theory in Political Philosophy. Oxford Research En-cyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1383.
Vallentyne, P. (1989). Contractarianism and the Assumption of Mutual Unconcern. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradi-tion, 56(2), 187–192.
van der Vossen, B. (2019). Libertarianism. In E.N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2019. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/libertarianism/ (Accessed: 20 November 2022).
van der Vossen, B. (2021). As Good As “Enough and As Good”. The Philosophical Quarter-ly, 71(1), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqaa025
Wempe, B. (2007). Four Design Criteria for any Future Contractarian Theory of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 697–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9542-x
Wenar, L. (2021) John Rawls. In E.N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2021. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/rawls/ (Accessed: 20 November 2022).
Young, H.P. (2001). Individual strategy and social structure. New Jersey: Princeton Univer-sity Press.