Cap a la contingència: com l’alfabetització en disseny afavoreix visions del món plurals i potencia el disseny transicional
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
La paraula alfabetització s’ha utilitzat per descriure una àmplia gamma de competències, entre les quals hi ha l’alfabetització en disseny, un terme que, malgrat la seva presència en el discurs del disseny, continua caracteritzant una certa confusió. En aquest article analitzem aquest camp teòric immensament discursiu per obtenir un coneixement més ampli i matisat del tema. En fer-ho, sostenim que aquestes postures divergents també són a causa de l’ambigüitat del terme disseny.
Entenem el disseny com una desconstrucció i reconstrucció permanent del món, com una manera de crear-lo, tant físicament com conceptualment. Per tant, l’alfabetització en disseny es pot entendre com una manera de percebre indicis de disseny i els seus processos, de percebre el món com a contingent: un procés cognitiu circular de reconeixement que una cosa, si no totes, al nostre plurivers cultural està dissenyada, i entendre com s’ha dissenyat i que es pot convertir, potencialment, en objecte de disseny una vegada i una altra. Al nostre article destaquem la contingència del disseny i el nivell ètic que se’n pot derivar en ser conscients de la possibilitat d’un disseny diferent.
Per últim, el nostre objectiu en aquest article és remarcar que l’alfabetització en disseny és una competència crucial per fomentar perspectives plurals i iniciar processos de transició, ja que ajuda a reconèixer la necessitat temporal, però no necessitat a llarg termini, de coses (cosa que inclou, especialment, la naturalesa transitòria de les creacions pròpies).
Paraules clau:
Article Details
Aquesta obra està sota una llicència internacional Creative Commons Reconeixement-NoComercial-SenseObraDerivada 4.0.
Referències
Boehnert, Joanna. 2013. ‘Ecological Literacy in Design Education: A Foundation for Sustainable Design’. In DRS // Cumulus: Design Learning for Tomorrow, 14-17 May. https://doi.org/10.21606/learnxdesign.2013.014.
Boehnert, Joanna. 2014. ‘Design vs. the Design Industry’. Design Philosophy Papers 12 (2): 119–36. https://doi.org/10.2752/144871314X14159818597513.
Boehnert, Joanna. 2015. ‘Ecological Literacy in Design Education - A Theoretical Introduction’. FormAkademisk - Forskningstidsskrift for Design Og Designdidaktikk 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1405.
Borries, Friedrich von. 2020. The World as Project: A Political Theory of Design. Prinsenbeek: Jap Sam Books.
Brandes, Uta, and Michael Erlhoff. 2006. Non Intentional Design. Cologne: Daab.
Brandes, Uta, Sonja Stich, and Miriam Wender. 2009. Design by Use: The Everyday Metamorphosis of Things. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Bravo, Úrsula, Liv Merete Nielsen, Eva Lutnæs, Erik Bohemia, and Naz A.G.Z. Börekçi. 2022. ‘Design Literacies: Pasts, Presents, and Possible Futures’. In DRS Biennial Conference Series: DRS2022, Bilbao. London: Design Research Society. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.1065.
Brodshaug, Irene, and Janne Beate Reitan. 2019. ‘Networking for Strengthening Design Literacy’. Conference Proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.33114/adim.2019.12.384.
Bürdek, Bernhard E. 1991. Design: Geschichte, Theorie und Praxis der Produktgestaltung. Köln: DuMont.
Bürdek, Bernhard E. 2005. Design: History, Theory and Practice of Product Design. Basel: Birkhauser.
Burnett, Cathy, and Jennifer Rowsell. 2022. ‘Introduction: Unsettling Literacies’. In Unsettling Literacies: Directions for Literacy Research in Precarious Times, edited by Claire Lee, Chris Bailey, Cathy Burnett, and Jennifer Rowsell. Cultural Studies and Transdisciplinarity in Education 15. Singapore: Springer.
Colomina, Beatriz, and Mark Wigley. 2016. Are We Human? Notes on an Archaeology of Design. Zürich: Lars Müller.
Cross, Nigel. 2006. Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer.
Dondis, Donis A. 1973. A Primer of Visual Literacy. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Eisele, Petra. 2008. ‘Bauhaus’. In Design Dictionary: Perspectives on Design Terminology, edited by Michael Erlhoff and Tim Marshall, 1st ed., 39–42. Board of International Research in Design (BIRD). Basel: Birkhäuser.
Escobar, Arturo. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. New Ecologies for the Twenty-First Century. Durham: Duke University Press.
European Commission, Directorate General for Enterprise, T. Koskinen, and M. Thomson. 2012. Design for Growth & Prosperity: Report and Recommendations of the European Design Leadership Board, edited by T. Koskinen and M. Thomson. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2769/52223.
Fezer, Jesko. 2022. Umstrittene Methoden: Architekturdiskurse der Verwissenschaftlichung, Politisierung und Partizipation im Umfeld des Design Methods Movement der 1960er Jahre. Hamburg: Adocs.
Flusser, Vilém. 1995. ‘On the Word Design: An Etymological Essay’. Translated by John Cullars. Design Issues 11 (3): 50–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511771.
Foucault, Michel. 2020. Archäologie des Wissens. Translated by Ulrich Köppen. 19. Auflage. Suhrkamp-Taschenbuch Wissenschaft 356. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Fry, Tony. 2011. Design as Politics. New York: Berg Publishers.
Godau, Marion. 2008. ‘Design Competence’. In Design Dictionary: Perspectives on Design Terminology, edited by Michael Erlhoff and Tim Marshall, 117–19. Board of International Research in Design (BIRD). Basel: Birkhäuser.
Groll, Sandra. 2022. Zwischen Kontingenz Und Notwendigkeit: Zur Rolle Des Designs in Der Gesellschaft Der Gegenwart. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Gros, Jochen. 1983. ‘Grundlagen einer Theorie der Produktsprache. Einführung’. In Der Offenbacher Ansatz: zur Theorie der Produktsprache, edited by Thilo Schwer and Kai Vöckler, 88–122. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Gros, Jochen. 1987. ‘Grundlagen einer Theorie der Produktsprache. Symbolfunktionen’. In Der Offenbacher Ansatz: zur Theorie der Produktsprache, edited by Thilo Schwer and Kai Vöckler, 184–207. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Heller, Steven. 2004. Design Literacy: Understanding Graphic Design. 2nd edition. New York: Allworth Press.
Irwin, Terry. 2015. ‘Transition Design: A Proposal for a New Area of Design Practice, Study, and Research’. Design and Culture 7 (2): 229–46.
Jonas, Wolfgang. 1992. ‘Produktsemantik - Ein Auslaufendes Theoriemodell?’ Designtheorie-Kolloquium der Bergischen Universität GH Wuppertal. http://8149.website.snafu.de/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/PRODUKTSEM-1.pdf.
Krippendorff, Klaus. 2006. The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. Boca Raton: CRC/Taylor & Francis.
Lutnæs, Eva. 2019. ‘Framing the Concept Design Literacy for General Public’. Conference Proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management. London: Academy for Design Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.33114/adim.2019.01.224.
Manzini, Ezio. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Mareis, Claudia. 2012. ‘The Epistemology of the Unspoken: On the Concept of Tacit Knowledge in Contemporary Design Research’. Design Issues 28 (2): 61–71.
Maus, Ingvill Gjerdrum. 2019. ‘Developing Design Literacy for Sustainability: Lower Secondary Students’ Life Cycle Thinking on Their Craft-Based Design Products’. FormAkademisk - Forskningstidsskrift for Design Og Designdidaktikk 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1725.
Maus, Ingvill Gjerdrum. 2021. ‘Critical Design Literacy through Reflection in Design’. In LearnxDesign 2021: Engaging with Challenges in Design Education. London: Design Research Society. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs_lxd2021.03.228.
Melles, Gavin, and Susana Paixao-Barradas. 2019. ‘Sustainable Design Literacy: Developing and Piloting Sulitest Design Module’. In Research into Design for a Connected World, edited by Amaresh Chakrabarti, 134:539–49. Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5974-3_47.
Micklethwaite, Paul. 2022. ‘Sustainable Design Masters: Increasing the Sustainability Literacy of Designers’. Sustainability 14 (6): 3255. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063255.
Musil, Robert. 1930. The Man Without Qualities. London: Picador.
Nelson, George, Karen Stein, and Michael Bierut. 2017. How to See: Visual Adventures in a World God Never Made. New Edition. London: Phaidon Press.
Nielsen, Liv Merete, Erik Bohemia, Janne Beate Reitan, Karen Brænne, Úrsula Bravo, and Catalina Cortés. 2019. ‘Establishing Design Literacy International Network’. Conference Proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management 2 (1). London: Academy for Design Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.33114/adim.2019.w08.435.
Nielsen, Liv Merete, and Karen Braenne. 2013. ‘Design Literacy for Longer Lasting Products’. Studies in Material Thinking 9.
Nielsen, Liv Merete, Eva Lutnæs, Mia Porko-Hudd, Úrsula Bravo, Catalina Cortés, Rita Assoreira Almendra, and Erik Bohemia. 2019. ‘Track 6.b Introduction: Design Literacy Enabling Critical Innovation Practices’. Conference Proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management 2 (1): 1291–94. London: Academy for Design Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.33114/adim.2019.6b.
Orr, David W. 1989. ‘Ecological Literacy’. Conservation Biology 3 (4): 334–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1989.tb00238.x.
Pacione, Christopher. 2010. ‘Evolution of the Mind: A Case for Design Literacy’. Interactions 17 (2): 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/1699775.1699777.
Pacione, Christopher. 2019. ‘A Framework to Accelerate Universal Design Literacy’. Conference Proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management 2 (1): 1318-1335. London: Academy for Design Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.33114/adim.2019.03.479.
Pahl, Kate, and Jennifer Rowsell, eds. 2020. ‘What Is Living Literacies?’ In Living Literacies: Literacy for Social Change, by Kate Pahl and Jennifer Rowsell, 1–24. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Poggenpohl, Sharon. 2008. ‘Design Literacy, Discourse and Communities of Practice.’ Visible Language 42: 213–35.
Polanyi, Michael. 2009. The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ringvold, Tore Andre, and Liv Merete Nielsen. 2021. ‘Complexity, Interdisciplinarity and Design Literacy’. FormAkademisk - Forskningstidsskrift for Design Og Designdidaktikk 14 (4). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4640.
Schwer, Thilo. 2014. Produktsprachen: Design zwischen Unikat und Industrieprodukt. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Shirky, Clay. 2010. ‘Foreword’. In Mediactive, edited by Dan Gillmor, IX–XI.
Simon, Herbert A. 1981. The Sciences of the Artificial. 2nd edition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Steffen, Dagmar, and Bernhard E. Bürdek. 2000. Design als Produktsprache: der “Offenbacher Ansatz” in Theorie und Praxis. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Form.
Stegall, Nathan. 2006. “Designing for Sustainability: A Philosophy for Ecologically Intentional Design’. Design Issues 22 (2): 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2006.22.2.56.
Tierney, Robert J., and P. David Pearson. 2021. A History of Literacy Education: Waves of Research and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Till, Jeremy. 2013. Architecture Depends. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Wahl, Daniel Christian. 2005. ‘Eco-Literacy, Ethics, and Aesthetics in Natural Design: The Artificial as an Expression of Appropriate Participation in Natural Process’. In European Academy of Design Conference: Design > System > Evolution, paper no. 92. Bremen: University of the Arts Bremen https://www.academia.edu/8703745/Eco_literacy_Ethics_and_Aesthetics_in_Natural_Design_The_Artificial_as_an_Expression_of_Appropriate_Participation_in_Natural_Process_Daniel_C_Wahl_2005_Centre_for_the_Study_of_Natural_Design.
World Commission on Environment and Development, ed. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford Paperbacks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.