Projectar des de la perspectiva de la cura o com reparar el món
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
L’objectiu d'aquest article és explorar la possibilitat de projectar en el disseny des de la perspectiva de la cura. L’article repassa el concepte de cura al llarg de la història del disseny del benestar. El text il·lustra els principals conceptes de l'ètica de la cura i els aplica a la filosofia del disseny. La vulnerabilitat es considera una postura moral indispensable per dissenyar a partir de la cura, i la narració, una via projectual per dissenyar des del punt de vista de la filosofia de la cura. D’altra banda, l’article presenta exemples de dissenyadors que tenen una concepció que va en la línia de l'ètica de la cura. Prenent com a base exemples de diferents dissenyadors, aquest article planteja què significaria per a l'àmbit del disseny pensar des de la perspectiva de la cura.
Article Details
Aquesta obra està sota una llicència internacional Creative Commons Reconeixement-NoComercial-SenseObraDerivada 4.0.
(c) Anna Pujadas, 2022
Anna Pujadas, Eina, Centre Universitari de Disseny i Art de Barcelona (UAB)
Anna Pujadas és una dissenyadora gràfica amb una carrera al darrere en l’àmbit de la creació digital. Té un grau en Història de l'Art (1990), un grau en Filosofia (1992) i un doctorat en Història de l’Art (1998) per la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB). També te un màster oficial de l'EHEA de la UOC, el Màster en eLearning (2020). És professora adjunta de l’Agència per a la Qualitat del Sistema Universitari de Catalunya (AQU, 2017) i professora titular de l’Agència Nacional d'Avaluació de la Qualitat i l’Acreditació (ANECA, 2017). Actualment investiga en el camp del disseny postdigital: com la revolució digital ha canviat els processos de disseny (la cultura maker, els fablabs, el DIY, un nou interès per l'artesania, l’autoimpressió, la postproducció, etc).
Ackermann, Laura. 2018. “Design for Product Care: Enhancing Consumers, Repair and Maintenance Activities.” The Design Journal 21(4): 543-551. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2018.1469331
Aflatoony, Leila, Ron Wakkary and Carman Neustaedter. 2018. “Becoming a design thinker: assessing the learning process of students in a secondary level design thinking course.” The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(3): 438–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12139
Alacovska, Ana, and Joëlle Bissonnette. 2021. “Care-ful Work: An Ethics of Care Approach to Contingent Labour in the Creative Industries.” Journal of Business Ethics 169: 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04316-3
Andrès, Roxane. N.d. “La fabrique de cœurs, Cité des sciences et de l’industrie, Paris.” Roxane Andrès: Design Recherche Création. http://www.roxaneandres.com/fabrique-coeurs-cite-sciences-lindustrie-paris/
Baranger, Vincent, Jean-Sébastien Blanc, Anthony Lebossé and Claire Renard. N.d. “Réanim, la médecine des objets”. 5·5, French Collective Studio. https://www.5-5.paris/en/projects/reanim-la-medecine-des-objets-2004-63
Bellacasa, María Puig de la. 2017. Matters of Care. Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
Berger, Estelle. 2017. “Rendre la critique créative. La démarche abductive et pragmatique du design.” Approches inductives 4(2): 109–132. https://doi.org/10.7202/1043433ar
Botero, Andrea i Sampsa Hyysalo. 2013. “Ageing together: Steps towards evolutionary co-design in everyday practices.” CoDesign 9(1): 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.760608
Bridard, Yann. 2014. Le confort moderne, cette maladie du bien-être. La qualité émotionnelle comme stratégie relationnelle corps/objet. París. https://bibliotheque.ecolecamondo.fr/pdf/BRIDARD_Yann.pdf
Brodersen, Søsser, and Hanne Lindegaard. 2016. “Staging co-design processes for self-care technologies.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 18(4): 354–368. http://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2015.1127286
Bush, Peta, and Simone ten Hompel. 2017. “An integrated craft and design approach for wearable orthoses.” Design for Health, 1(1): 86-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2017.1299439
Carpenter, Vanessa Julia, Amanda Willis, Nikolaj Møbius and Dan Overholt. 2019. “Electronic Kintsugi. An Investigation of Everyday Crafted Objects in Tangible Interaction Design.” In Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02686-8_9
Cometta, Mosè. 2021. “Digital capitalism and the e-health revolution.” Teknokultura 18(2): 175-183. https://doi.org/10.5209/tekn.74387
Contreras, Trinidad. N.d. Trinidad Contreras: Casa-Taller. https://trinidadcontreras.com/
Cranny-Francis, Anne. 2011. “Semefulness: a social semiotics of touch.” Social Semiotics 21(4): 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2011.591993
Crowley, John E. 2000. The Invention of Comfort: Sensibilities and Design in Early Modern Britain and Early America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Clifford, Helen. 2002. “The Invention of Comfort: Sensibilities & Design in Early Modern Britain & Early America.” Journal of Design History 15(1): 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/15.1.57
Crocker, Sophie, and David Leatherbarrow. 2018. “The closed loop: ninety years of health care architecture.” Design for Health 2(1): 20-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2018.1447181
Dautrey, Jehanne. 2019. “Repenser le design parle care ou le care parle design? Pour un design micro politique.” In Design et pensée du care. Pour un design des microluttes et des sungularités. Nancy: Ecole nationale supérieure d’art et de design de Nancy.
Dee, Marianne and Vicki L. Hanson. 2019. “Effectively including the voice of residents in care home design.” Design for Health 3(2): 283-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2019.1690862
Domènech, Miquel, and Michael Schillmeier. 2010. New technologies and emerging spaces of care. New York: Routledge.
Domènech, Miquel, and Joan Moyà-Köhler. 2021. “Autonomías precarias: un análisis sobre las tecnologías para personas con diversidad funcional intelectual.” Teknokultura 18(2): 127-135. https://doi.org/10.5209/tekn.74375
Garcia O’Dowd, Carles. N.d. “Projecte Úter, 2014-2015.” G.O’D: Visual artist based in NYC.
https://www.carlesgod.com/projecteuter
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gilligan, Carol. 2013. “El daño moral y la ética del cuidado.” La ética del cuidado, Cuadernos de la Fundació Víctor Grífols i Lucas 30: 10-39. http://www.secpal.com/%5CDocumentos%5CBlog%5Ccuaderno30.pdf
Green, Maia, and Victoria Lawson. 2011. “Recentring care: interrogating the commodification of care.” Social & Cultural Geography 12(6): 639-654. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2011.601262
Guilleux, Céline. 2017. “Design et pensée du care.” In Design et pensée du care. Pour un design des microluttes et des sungularités, edited by Jehanne Dautrey. Nancy: Ecole nationale supérieure d’art et de design de Nancy. https://calenda.org/390966
Hernandez, Ricardo J., Constanza Miranda and Julian Goñi. 2020. “Empowering Sustainable Consumption by Giving Back to Consumers the Right to Repair.” Sustainability, Basel, 12(3): 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030850
Irwin, Terry. 2019. The Transition Design Approach. Otawa: IST Conference. https://www.academia.edu/39789706/IST_2019_Conference_Poster_The_Transition_Design_Approach
Kanişkan, Ece. 2018. “Kintsugi: yara izlerinin güzelliği.” Ulakbilge Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 6(21): 161–178.
Kaufman-Osborn, Timothy, Nancy J. Hirschmann, Daniel Engster, Fiona Robinson, Nicola Yeates, and Joan C. Tronto. 2018. “Symposium Review: 25th Anniversary of Moral Boundaries by Joan Tronto.” Politics and Gender 14(4): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X18000417
Maldini, Irene. 2016. “Attachment, Durability and the Environmental Impact of Digital DIY.” The Design Journal 19(1): 141-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2016.1085213
Matamalas, Tonina. N.d. “Projecte Úter”. Tonina Matamalas. https://www.toninamatamalas.com/Projecte-Uter
Melo da Silva, Dayana. 2019. “A ecosofia de Michel Maffesoli e suas implicações tecnocomunicacionais.” Revista Mídia e Cotidiano 13(2). https://doi.org/10.22409/ppgmc.v13i2.29088.
Michael, Patricia, and William Meacham. 2001. “Permaculture as a Design Modality for Healing and Regeneration: Design with a Deeper Agenda.” The Design Journal 4(2): 42-49. https://doi.org/10.2752/146069201790718595
Mingwei, Lee. 2022. “Artist Statement.” LEE Mingwei. https://www.leemingwei.com/artist.php
Oropallo, Gabriele. 2019. “The fixing I: Repair as prefigurative politics.” In Design culture: Objects and approaches, edited by Guy Julier, Mads Nygaard, Niels Peter Skou, Hans-Christian Jensen and Anders V. Munch, 157-169. London: Bloomsbury.
Perreau, Bruno. 2010. “Tronto Joan, Un monde vulnérable. Pour une politique du care.” Genre, sexualité & société 4. https://doi.org/10.4000/gss.1699
Perrotin. N.d. “Lee Mingwei: The mending project, 2009.” Perrotin. https://www.perrotin.com/artists/lee_mingwei/550/the-mending-project/48705
Pierron, Jean-Philippe. 2021. “Care: A New Arrival in the History of Philosophy?.” In Philosophy of Care. New Approaches to Vulnerability, Otherness and Therapy, edited by Joaquim Braga, and Mário Santiago Carvalho. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75478-5
Pols, Jeannette. 2017. “Good relations with technology: Empirical ethics and aesthetics in care.” Nursing Philosophy 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12154
Price, Amy. 2021. “Commentary: My pandemic grief and the Japanese art of kintsugi.” BMJ 374(8304). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1906
Prieto González, Eduardo. 2013. “La cultura del bienestar. Poéticas del confort en la arquitectura de los siglos XIX y XX.” Cuadernos de Proyectos Arquitectónicos 4: 22–31.
Roux-Rosier, Anahid, Ricardo Azambuja and Gazi Islam. 2018. “Alternative visions: Permaculture as imaginaries of the Anthropocene.” Organization 25(4): 550–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418778647
Santini, Céline. 2019. Kintsugi: el arte de la resiliencia. Barcelona: Cúpula.
Scolari, Carlos Alberto. 2013. Narrativas transmedia. Cuando todos los medios cuentan. Barcelona: Deusto.
Soriano, Tino. 2021. “Fotografía y medicina.” Fotografiando a la gente. http://www.tinosoriano.com/es/portada
Taño, Elías. 2017. “Cita con... Beehive Collective y Projecte Úter. Dos ejemplos de gráfica política frente a la hegomonía cultural.” EME Experimental Illustration, Art & Design 5: 48-51. https://doi.org/10.4995/eme.2017.7615
Taylor Aiken, Gerald. 2017. “Permaculture and the social design of nature.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 99(2): 172-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2017.1315906
Thygesen, Hilde, and Ingunn Brita Moser. 2010. “Technology and good dementia care: an argument for an ethics-in-practice approach.” In New technologies and emerging spaces of care, edited by Miquel Domènech and Michael Schillmeier, 129-147. New York: Routledge.
Tronto, Joan C. 1987. “Más allá de la diferencia de género. Hacia una teoría del cuidado.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 12(4). http://www.unsam.edu.ar/escuelas/humanidades/centros/cedehu/material/(13)%20Texto%20Joan%20Tronto.pdf
Tronto, Joan C. 1992. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
Tronto, Joan C. 2012. Le risque ou le care?. París: Presses Universitaires de France.
Vallès-Peris, Núria. 2021. “Repensar la robótica y la inteligencia artificial desde la ética de los cuidados.” Teknokultura 18(2): 137–146. https://doi.org/10.5209/tekn.73983