How to Cite
Abstract
In front of the restrictive –and critical– interpretation done by the scientific literature regarding the addition of the word "daily" in the right to reduced working hours regulated by art. 37.5 ET, it is reasoned that, with this interpretation, the rule should be declared unconstitutional for various reasons (the legislative procedure that was used, the ignorance of the constitutional dimension of conciliation rights and the "ex lege" generation of a situation of indirect discrimination) and, therefore, it is proposed –from the specific judicial function– an alternative interpretation consistent with the constitutional framework.Rights
Copyright
IUSLabor is an open access journal, based on the idea that making research available to the public openly and free of charge favors the global exchange of knowledge.
Consequently, all content is freely available, free of charge to users and their institutions. Users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link the full texts of the articles in this journal without prior permission from the Editorial Committee or the author of the article, provided their authorship is acknowledged.
In this sense, IUSLabor uses the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Authors grant, in a non-exclusive way, rights of reproduction, publication, distribution, public communication and transformation of their work for publication in IUSLabor and for inclusion in the databases in which the journal is indexed.
Likewise, authors authorize that their article be published with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work published in IUSLabor (for example, on institutional repositories, personal websites or social media), always referring to their publication in IUSLabor.