On ‘emotional education’: subjectivity and psychologization in late modernity
Article Sidebar
Google Scholar citations
Main Article Content
This paper analyzes a series of discourses that promote the so called "emotional education", which rely on contributions from positive psychology, theories of intelligence and emotional competences. This inquiry enables exploration of the type of subject these discourses seek to shape, the characteristics and abilities promoted among students, as well as the way emotions are conceived and manners to deal with them. The paper hypothesizes that these discourses are part of what some authors refer to as "therapeutic ethos", which postulates that through knowing and managing one's emotions it is possible to take advantage of them in order to achieve success and emotional well-being. Additionally, this paper holds the view that by focusing on the individual and the development of specific competences, these approaches leave in the shadows institutional, socioeconomic and cultural conditions, therefore overlooking the relational nature of individuals’ emotions, both in general and in educational settings in particular. The paper concludes with a series of questions about the relationship between these approaches and the implications of their implementation when working with children and young people, as well as about their connection with processes of socio-educational inequality.
Article Details
Copyright
For all articles published in Digithum that are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence, the copyright is retained by the author(s); the full text of the license can be consulted on http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0. Thus, copying, distribution, public communication, derivative works and commercial use of content are permitted as of the aforementioned issue provided that the source (Digithum), the author of the text and the institution that publishes them (UOC, UdeA) are cited.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.
Assignment of intellectual property rights
The author non exclusively transfers the rights to use (reproduce, distribute, publicly broadcast or transform) and market the work, in full or part, to the journal’s editors in all present and future formats and modalities, in all languages, for the lifetime of the work and worldwide.
I hereby declare that I am the original author of the work. The editors shall thus not be held responsible for any obligation or legal action that may derive from the work submitted in terms of violation of third parties’ rights, whether intellectual property, trade secret or any other right.
Mariana Nobile, FLACSO Argentina; FaHCE – UNLP
Holds a Doctorate in Social Sciences from the Latin American School of Social Sciences (FLACSO), Argentina. Earned a Master’s Degree in Sociology of Culture and Cultural Analysis from IDEAS (UNSAM). Holds a Bachelor’s degree in Sociology (FaHCE – UNLP). She has been a researcher at the Education, Knowledge and Society Program from the Education Area of FLACSO since 2005. She is a Professor of Sociology of Education at FaHCE-UNLP. She is a member of the Editorial Board of the magazine Propuesta Educativa. She has been awarded a doctoral fellowship and a post-doctoral fellowship from the National Council of Scienfic and Technical Research (CONICET), Argentina. In 2014 she was awarded a post-doctoral fellowship by COIMBRA Group for a short-research visit at Université Catholique de Louvain (Belgium). She currently leads the research project Mérito e ideología meritocrática en la educación secundaria argentina: la legitimación de los procesos de desigualdad socioeducativa (merit and ideology in Argentinean secondary schools: legitimating processses of socio-educational inequality), funded by the National Agency for Science and Technology Promotion. Her research interests include: teacher-student bonds in secondary schools and their relationship with the school format; the emotional dimension of school experience as well as their impact both on school inclusion processes and on students’ biographical accounts.