Fotografía como protogeometría

Main Article Content

Tomáš Dvořák

El artículo investiga las relaciones entre la medición y la creación de imágenes, centrándose en el contexto histórico común para la universalización de los estándares de medición y la aparición de la fotografía. Analiza varias obras de arte que abordan directamente el problema de la medición y la estandarización (las 3 stoppages-étalon de Marcel Dchamp; Throwing Three Balls in the Air to Get a Straight Line (Best of Thirty-Six Attempts) de John Baldessari; y Constant de Sasha Litvintseva y Beny Wagner) para demostrar la tensión entre lo particular y lo universal, lo material y lo ideal, y afirmar que tanto los estándares metrológicos como las imágenes técnicas siempre existen como múltiples variantes de entidades idealizadas.

Palabras clave
fotografía, medición, estandarización, protogeometría

Article Details

Cómo citar
Dvořák, Tomáš. «Fotografía como protogeometría». Artnodes, n.º 34, pp. 1-10, doi:10.7238/artnodes.v0i34.425717.
Biografía del autor/a

Tomáš Dvořák, FAMU en Pragua

Tomáš Dvořák ha sido profesor asociado en el Departamento de Fotografía de la Facultad de Cine y TV (FAMU) de la Academia de Artes Escénicas de Praga. Su investigación se centra en la historia y la teoría de las artes, los media y la cultura visual, con énfasis en sus contextos científicos y tecnológicos. Recientemente editó, con Jussi Parikka, Photography Off the Scale: Theories and Technologies of the Mass Image (Edinburgh University Press 2021) y un número especial de la revista Philosophy of Photography (2022, vol. 13, nº 1) sobre la creación de imágenes sin cámara.

Citas

Alder, Ken. The Measure of All Things: The Seven-Year Odyssey that Transformed the World. London: Little, Brown, 2002.

Babbage, Charles. “On the Advantage of a Collection of Numbers, to be entitled The Constants of Nature and Art […] In a Letter to Dr Brewster”. The Edinburgh Journal of Science, new series 6, no. 2, (1832a): 334-340.

Babbage, Charles. On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures. London: Charles Knight, 1832b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/sil.975430.39088015716483

Batchen, Geoffrey. Apparitions: Photography and Dissemination. Sydney: Power Publications and Prague: NAMU, 2018.

Batchen, Geoffrey. “The Naming of Photography: ‘A Mass of Metaphor’”. History of Photography, vol. 17, no. 1 (1993, Spring): 22-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03087298.1993.10442589

Cabanne, Pierre. Dialogues with Marcel Duchamp. Translated by Ron Padgett. London: Thames and Hudson, 1971.

Cannon, Susan Faye. Science in Culture: The Early Victorian Period. New York: Science History Publications, 1978.

Clair, Jean. Duchamp et la photographie. Paris: Chêne, 1977.

Daston, Lorraine and Peter Galison. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books, 2007.

Deleuze, Gilles and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Brian Massumi. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.

Derrida, Jacques. Edmund Husserl’s Origin of Geometry: An Introduction. Translated by John P. Leavey, Jr. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 1989.

Dettelbach, Michael. “Humboldtian Science”. In: N. Jardine, J. A. Secord and E. C. Spary (eds.). Cultures of Natural History. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 287-304.

Hacking, Ian. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819766

Heilbron, J. L. “Introductory Essay”. In: Tore Frängsmyr, J.L. Heilbron, and Robin E. Rider (eds.). The Quantifying Spirit in the 18th Century. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990), 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520321595-002

Henderson, Linda Dalrymple. The Fourth Dimension and Non-Euclidean Geometry in Modern Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1575193

Herschel, John. A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy. London: Longman, 1831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11845-000

Kelsey, Robin. Photography and the Art of Chance. Cambridge, Mass. and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2015.

Krauss, Rosalind E. The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths. Cambridge, Mass. and London: The MIT Press, 1985.

Kuhn, Thomas S. “The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science”. Isis, vol. 52, no. 2 (1961, June): 161-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/349468

Kuhn, Thomas S. “Mathematical vs. Experimental Traditions in the Development of Physical Science”. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, vol. 7, no. 1 (1976, Summer): 1-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/202372

Kula, Witold. Measures and Men. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.

Litvintseva, Sasha and Beny Wagner. “Monster as Medium: Experiments in Perception in Early Modern Science and Film”. e-flux Journal, no. 116, (2021, March). https://www.e-flux.com/journal/116/379558/monster-as-medium-experiments-in-perception-in-early-modern-science-and-film/

Lugli, Emanuele. The Making of Measure and the Promise of Sameness. Chicago - London: The University of Chicago Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226612522.001.0001

Marey, Étienne-Jules. La méthode graphique dans les sciences expérimentales. Paris: G. Masson, 1878.

Molderings, Herbert. Duchamp and the Aesthetics of Chance: Art as Experiment. Translated by John Brogden. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/mold14762

Morris, Errol. Believing is Seeing: Observations on the Mysteries of Photography. New York: The Penguin Press, 2011.

Mumford, Lewis. The Myth of the Machine: Technics and Human Development. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich, 1967.

O’Connell, Joseph. “Metrology: The Creation of Universality by the Circulation of Particulars”. Social Studies of Science, vol. 23, no. 1 (1993, February): 129-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030631293023001005

Sanouillet, Michel and Elmer Peterson (eds.). The Essential Writings of Marcel Duchamp. London: Thames and Hudson, 1973.

Shapin, Steven and Simon Schaffer. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.

Shearer, Rhonda Roland and Stephen Jay Gould. “Hidden in Plain Sight: Duchamp’s 3 Standard Stoppages, More Truly a ‘Stoppage’ (An Invisible Mending) Than We Ever Realized”. Tout-Fait: Marcel Duchamp Studies Online Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, (1999). http://www.toutfait.com/issues/issue_1/News/stoppages.html

Snyder, Joel. “Visualization and Visibility”. In: Caroline A. Jones and Peter Galison (eds.). Picturing Science, Producing Art. (London and New York: Routledge, 1998), 379-397.

Sontag, Susan. Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/dio.201.0127

Stieglitz, Alfred. “The Hand Camera – Its Present Importance”. The American Annual of Photography and Photographic Times Almanac, no. 11, (1897): 24-25.

Tal, Eran. “How Accurate Is the Standard Second?”. Philosophy of Science, vol. 78, no. 5 (2011, December): 1082-1096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/662268

Tresch, John. Romantic Machine: Utopian Science and Technology after Napoleon. Chicago – London: The University of Chicago Press, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226812229.001.0001

Wise, M. Norton. “Introduction”. In: M. Norton Wise (ed.). The Values of Precision. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995), 3-13.

Artículos similares

<< < 1 2 3 

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.