VERB-INDIRECT OBJECT-DIRECT OBJECT and VERB-DIRECT OBJECT-INDIRECT OBJECT A variationist analysis of oral Spanish
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the study of constituent order in ditransitive constructions by means of a variationist analysis based on spoken Spanish from Madrid. We analyze the variable position of objects in ditransitive clauses. We identify two variants: (1) Verb-Direct Object-Indirect Object and (2) Verb-Indirect Object-Direct Object. We include in the envelope of variation ditransitive constructions in which the DO is expressed by a noun phrase (sometimes preceded by the marker a) and the IO is expressed by means of a prepositional phrase preceded by a ‘to’. The percentage of V-IO-DO constructions in our data is 33%. The results of our statistical analyses show that V-IO-DO is significantly conditioned by the following linguistic factors: grammatical person of the IO, type of DO, and verb type. Unlike previous studies, we find that information flow factors do not have a significant effect on this word order variation. Considering its recurrent usage patterns in the discourse, we identify the verb decir ‘to say’ and the constructions it occurs in as the likely source and spread of the V-IO-DO order.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
(c) Javier Rivas, 2025
Aijón Oliva, Miguel. 2019. Constructing us. The first and second person in Spanish media discourse. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110643442
Alonso Ramos, Margarita. 2004. Las construcciones con verbo de apoyo. Madrid: Visor.
Aranovich, Raúl. 2016. A partitioned chi-square analysis of variation in Spanish clitic doubling: the case of dar ‘give’. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 23(3): 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2016.1169846
Ariel, Mira, Dattner, Elitzur, Du Bois, John W., & Tan Linzen. 2015. Pronominal datives: The royal road to argument status. Studies in Language 39(2): 257–321. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.2.01ari
Ashby, William, & Paola Bentivoglio. 1993. Preferred argument structure in spoken French and Spanish. Language Variation and Change 5: 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095439450000140X
Bhaskararao, Peri, & Karumuri V. Subbarao (eds). 2004. Non-nominative subjects. 2 vols. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.60
Bhat, D. N. Shankara. 2004. Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230242.001.0001
Bogard, Sergio. 2010. La frase nominal de objeto directo antepuesta al verbo en español. In S. Bogard (ed.), Semántica, pragmática y prosodia: Reflejos en el orden de palabras en español, 69–115. México: El Colegio de México.
Bossong, Georg. 2021. DOM and linguistic typology: A personal view. In J. Kabatek, P. Obrist, & A. Wall (eds), Differential Object Marking in Romance: The third wave, 21–36. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110716207-002
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526
Cépeda, Paola, & Sonia Cyrino. 2020. Putting objects in order: Asymmetrical relations in Spanish and Portuguese ditransitives. In A. Pineda, & J. Mateu (eds), Dative constructions in Romance and beyond, 97–116. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.3776539
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, consciousness and time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Company Company, Concepción. 2006. El objeto indirecto. In C. Company Company (ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Vol. 1. La frase verbal. Primera parte, 479–574. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica and UNAM.
Delbecque, Nicole, & Béatrice Lamiroy. 1996. Towards a typology of the Spanish dative. In W. Van Belle, & W. Van Langedonck (eds), The dative. Vol. 1. Descriptive studies, 73–117. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cagral.2.06del
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611896
Dryer, Matthew. 1997. On the 6-way word order typology. Studies in Language 21: 69–103. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.21.1.04dry
Dryer, Matthew. 2013a. Against the six-way order typology, again. Studies in Language 37: 267–301. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.2.02dry
Dryer, Matthew. 2013b. Order of subject, object and verb. In M. Dryer, & M. Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (v2020.3) [Data set]. Zenodo. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/81, Accessed on 9/25/2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7385533.
Du Bois, John W. 1980. Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. In W. Chafe (ed.), The Pear Stories. Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production, 203–274. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Du Bois, John W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63(4): 805–855. https://doi.org/10.2307/415719
Du Bois, John W. 2003. Argument structure. Grammar in use. In J. W. Du Bois, L. E. Kumpf, & W. J. Ashby (eds), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 11–60. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.14.04dub
Dufter, Andreas, & Elizabeth Stark. 2008. Double indirect object marking in Spanish and Italian. In E. Seoane, & M. J. López Couso (eds), Theoretical and empirical issues in grammaticalization, 111–129. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.77.07duf
Enghels, Renata. 2012. Transitivity of Spanish perception verbs: A gradual category? An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2(1): 35–56. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.2.1.2522
Erker, Daniel, Ho-Fernández, Eduardo, Otheguy, Ricardo, & Naomi Shin. 2017. Continuity and change in Spanish among Cubans in New York: A study of subject placement with finite verbs. In A. Cuza (ed.), Cuban Spanish dialectology. Variation, contact and change, 63–82. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Gili Gaya, Samuel. 1980. Curso superior de sintaxis española. 13rd ed. Barcelona: Biblograph.
Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: an introduction. In T. Givón (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study, 1–41. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3.01giv
Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax. An introduction. 2 vols. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.syns
Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Guerrero Hernández, Noemí. 2014. Aproximación a las condiciones de uso de los dativos sin copia clítica en español de México. Signo y Seña 25: 85–103. https://doi.org/10.34096/sys.n25.3068
Haspelmath, Martin, & the APiCS Consortium. 2013. Order of recipient and theme in ditransitive constructions. In S. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath, & M. Huber (eds) The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available online at APiCS Online (apics-online.info), Accessed on 9/25/2024.
Heine, Bernd, & Christa König. 2010. On the linear order of ditransitive objects. Language Sciences 32(1): 87–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2008.07.002
Hopper, Paul, & Sandra A. Thompson. 1993. Language universals, discourse pragmatics and semantics. Language Sciences 15: 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(93)90009-H
Kittilä, Seppo. 2007. On the encoding of transitivity-related features on the indirect object. Functions of Language 14(1): 149-164. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.14.1.09kit
Klee, Carol, Tight, Daniel, & Rocío Caravedo. 2011. Variation and change in Peruvian word order: The impact of migration to Lima. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 30: 5–31.
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 1. Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Leonetti, Manuel, & Victoria Escandell-Vidal. 2009. Fronting and verum focus in Spanish. In A. Dufter, & D. Jacob (eds), Focus and background in Romance languages, 155–204. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.112.07leo
Li, Chao. 2015. Competing motivations and ditransitive encoding and ordering. Studies in Language 39(2): 322-353. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.2.02li
Llompart, Miquel. 2016. Subject-verb order variation with unaccusative verbs of change of location in Mexico and Southern Arizona. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 9(1): 143–173. https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2016-0006
López Meirama, Belén. 1997. Aportaciones de la tipología lingüística a una gramática particular: el concepto de orden básico y su aplicación al castellano. Verba 24: 45–82.
Marchís Moreno, Mihaela, & Mario Navarro. 2015. El verbo causativo hacer en el español loísta: Nuevas perspectivas para la Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 13(25): 183–197. https://doi.org/10.31819/rili-2015-132511
Marcos Marín, Francisco. 1994. Corpus oral de referencia del español contemporáneo [Online corpus]. www.lllf.uam.es/~fmarcos/informes/corpus/corpusix.html
Martin Haspelmath. 2013. Ditransitive constructions: The verb ‘give’. In M. Dryer, & M. Haspelmath (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (v2020.3) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7385533 (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/105, Accessed on 9/25/2024).
Mendívil Giró, José L. 1999. Las palabras disgregadas. Sintaxis de las expresiones idiomáticas y los predicados complejos. Zaragoza, Spain: Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza.
Ocampo, Francisco. 1990. The pragmatics of word order in constructions with a verb and a subject. Hispanic Linguistics 4(1): 87–128.
Ocampo, Francisco. 2002. The word order of constructions with ser and estar, a subject NP, and an adjective in spoken Spanish. In J. F. Lee, K. L. Geeslin, & J. Clancy Clements (eds), Structure, meaning and acquisition in Spanish. Papers from the 4th Hispanic linguistics symposium, 221–229. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Ortiz Ciscomani, Rosa María. 2005. Los objetos concurrentes y la bitransitividad en el español en perspectiva diacrónica. In D. Eddington (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 192–202. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
PRESEEA. 2014-. Corpus del Proyecto para el estudio sociolingüístico del español de España y de América. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá. http://preseea.uah.es/ (Accessed on 2/10/2021).
Primus, Beatrice, 1998. The relative order of recipient and patient in the languages of Europe. In A. Siewierska (ed.), Constituent order in the languages of Europe, 421–473. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110812206.421
Pulido, Manuel. 2021. Remapping variable subject position in Spanish intransitives: A proposal for functionally defined categories in motion verbs. Spanish in Context 18(2): 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.19006.pul
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Rini, Joel. 1991. The redundant indirect object construction in Spanish: A new perspective. Romance Philology 45(2): 269–286.
Rivas, Javier. 2008. La posición del sujeto en las construcciones monoactanciales del español: Una aproximación funcional. Hispania 91(4): 897–912.
Rivas, Javier. 2013a. Variable subject position in main and subordinate clauses in Spanish: A usage-based approach. Moenia. Revista Lucense de Lingüística & Literatura 19: 97–113. https://doi.org/10.15304/m.v19i0.1936
Rivas, Javier 2013b. A usage-based analysis of morphosyntactic variation in the complementation of manipulative verbs. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 11(21): 155–171.
Roggia, Aaron B. 2018. An investigation of unaccusativity and word order in Mexican Spanish. Spanish in Context 15(1): 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.00004.rog
Rosales Alvar, Renata. 2004. El orden de los objetos directo e indirecto en español: Un estudio diacrónico. Undergraduate thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Sanromán Vilas, Begoña. 2009. Diferencias semánticas entre construcciones con verbo de apoyo y sus correlatos verbales simples. Estudios de lingüística. Universidad de Alicante 23: 289–314. https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA2009.23.13
Siewierska, Anna. 1988. Word order rules. London: Croom Helm.
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2012. Variationist sociolinguistics. Change, observation, interpretation. Malden, MA / Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Thompson, Sandra. 1990. Information flow and dative shift in English discourse. In J. Edmondson, C. Feagin, & P. Mühlhäusler (eds), Development and diversity. Language variation across time and space. A Festschrift for Charles-James N. Bailey, 239–253. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington Publications in Linguistics.
Thompson, Sandra A., & Paul Hopper. 2001. Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation. In J. Bybee, & P. Hopper (eds), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 27–60. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.03tho
Tomlin, Russell. 1986. Basic word order. Functional principles. London: Croom Helm.
Vázquez Rozas, Victoria, & Marco García Salido. 2012. A discourse-based analysis of object clitic doubling in Spanish. In K. Davidse, T. Breban, L. Brems, T. Mortelmans, B. Cornillie, H. Cuyckens, & T. Leuschner (eds.), Grammaticalization and language change. New reflections, 271–298. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.130.11vaz