Digital transformation in education: discourse on teaching for the future in educational references
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
This study compares the discourses of Brazilian digital transformation policies with those of other types of national and global actors to identify their perspectives on teaching for the future. An exploratory study based on the method of Critical Discourse Analysis seeks answers to the research problem: how does the discourse of digital transformation disseminated by Brazilian public policies relate to that of other types of actors seeking to influence the educational agenda in terms of teaching for the future? The analysis shows how, more than discourses, the texts structure social practices, reaffirming socio-technical imaginaries elaborated by political networks of digital governance, which insert educational contexts into processes of digital privatization. In doing so, they make explicit the contradictions between the high expectations of digitizing education and the inequalities that persist in Brazil's socio-historical development, with the concern for basic digital skills permeating national discourses.
Article Details
(c) 2025
Copyright
Temps d’Educació reserves the right to publish the article first, with the author being granted the corresponding copyright. In addition, all the contents published in Temps d’Educació are subject to the Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence.Ball, S. J. (2012) Global education inc.: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary.
London, Routledge.
Brasil (2014) Lei nº 13.005, de 25 de junho de 2014. Aprova o Plano Nacional de Educação - PNE e dá outras providências. Brasília.
Brasil Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovações (2021) Estratégia Brasileira de Inte- ligência Artificial – EBIA. Brasília. https://www.gov.br/mcti/pt-br/assuntos/inteligen- cia-artificial [Consulta: 16 de noviembre de 2024].
Brasil (2023) Lei nº 14.533, de 11 de janeiro de 2023. Institui a Política Nacional de Educação Digital. Diário Oficial da União: Seção 1. Brasília. https://www.planalto.gov.br/cci- vil_03/_Ato2023-2026/2023/Lei/L14533.htm [Consulta: 16 de noviembre de 2024].
Brasil Ministério da Educação. (2022) Base Nacional Comum Curricular: Computação. Bra- sília. https://www.bncc.mec.gov.br [Consulta: 16 de noviembre de 2024].
Carrilo, A. F. (s.f.) Unicórnios – startups que atingiram o topo e querem mais! Abstartups. https://abstartups.com.br/startups_unicornio/ [Consulta: 30 de noviembre de 2024].
Fairclough, N. (2001) Discurso e mudança social. Brasília, Editora Universidade de Brasília.
Fundação Telefônica Vivo (2022) Recomendações para implementação da BNCC Compu- tação. São Paulo. https://fundacaotelefonica.org.br [Consulta: 17 de diciembre de 2024].
GoStudent (s.f.-a) Clases particulares personalizadas con una tasa de éxito del 96 %. https://www.gostudent.org/es-es/ [Consulta: 04 de diciembre de 2024].
GoStudent (s.f.-b) ¿Por qué convertirte en profesor/a particular? https://www.gostu- dent.org/es-es/beneficios-tutor/ [Consulta: 04 de diciembre de 2024].
GoStudent (s.f.-c) The end of school as you know it: Education in 2050. https://hello1.gos- tudent.org/en/education-in-2050/ [Consulta: 04 de diciembre de 2024].
Ideland, M. (2021) «Google and the end of the teacher? How a figuration of the teacher is produced through an ed-tech discourse». Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 46, núm. 1, p. 33-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1809452
Knox, J., Williamson, B. y Bayne, S. (2019) «Machine behaviourism: future visions of ‘learni- fication’ and ‘datafication’ across humans and digital technologies». Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 45, núm. 1, p. 31-45 DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2019.1623251
Morozov, E. (2018) Big Tech: A ascensão dos dados e a morte da política. São Paulo, Ubu. OECD (2019) Working and learning together: Rethinking human resource policies for schools.
OECD Reviews of School Resources. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1787/b7aaf050-en
Peroni, V. y Adrião, T. (2005) «Público não-estatal: estratégias para o setor educacional brasileiro». En T. Adrião y V. Peroni (Orgs.) O público e o privado na educação: Interfaces entre o Estado e sociedade. São Paulo, Xamã, p. 138-153.
Rikowski, G. (2017) «Privatização em educação e formas de mercadoria». Retratos da Es- cola, vol. 11, núm. 21, p. 393-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22420/rde.v11i21.810
Roberts-Mahoney, H., Means, A. J. y Garrison, M. J. (2016) «Netflixing human capital de- velopment: personalized learning technology and the corporatization of K-12 educa- tion». Journal of Education Policy, vol. 31, núm. 4, p. 1-16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1132774
Saura, G., Peroni, V. M. V., Pires, D. y Lima, P. V. (2024) «Capitalismo na era digital e edu- cação: Democracia, Estado e ideologia». Revista Lusófona de Educação, vol. 63, p. 137-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.60543/issn.1645-7250.rle63.09
Saura, G., Cancela, E. y Parcerisa, L. (2023) «Privatización educativa digital». Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, vol. 27, núm. 1, p. 11-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v27i1.27019
Teräs, M., Suoranta, J., Teräs, H. y Curcher, M. (2020) «Post-COVID-19 education and edu- cation technology ‘solutionism’: A seller’s market». Postdigital Science and Education, vol. 2, p. 863-878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00164-x
Verger, A. (2010) «Framing and selling global education policy: The promotion of public- private partnerships for education in low-income contexts». Journal of Education Pol- icy, vol. 27, núm. 1, p. 109-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2011.623242