The Reception of the Gospel of Mark from St. Jerome to Erasmus

Article Sidebar

pdf (Castellano)

Main Article Content

Ana Rodríguez Láiz
Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6739-2668

The reception of the Gospel of Mark throughout history has been paradoxical. Its early connection to the figure of Peter and to Rome was not enough for it to occupy a prominent place in patristic and medieval times. Studies and comments on this work from St. Jerome to Erasmus are scarce but significant. On the other hand, in the reception of the Gospel of Mark during this period, the figure of St. Jerome will have great importance. He is not only one of the few Fathers of the Church who paid attention to this Gospel, but, in addition, studies after him will be diffused associated with his name.

Keywords
Gospel of Mark, Saint Jerome, Erasmo, Patristic Literature

Article Details

How to Cite
Rodríguez Láiz, Ana. “The Reception of the Gospel of Mark from St. Jerome to Erasmus”. Mirabilia: electronic journal of antiquity and middle ages, no. 31, pp. 322-36, https://raco.cat/index.php/Mirabilia/article/view/377846.
References
BISCHOFF, Bernhard. “Wendepunkte in der Geschichte der lateinischen Exegese im
Frühmittelalter”, Sacris Erudiri 1954, 6, pp. 189-279.

CAHILL, Michael. “The Identification of the First Markan Commentary”, Revue Biblique 1994,
101/2, pp. 258-268.

EVANS, Gillian R. The Language and Logic of the Bible: The Road to the Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

GOODACRE, Mark. The Sinoptic Problem. A Way Through the Maze. London: Sheffield Academic
Press, 2001.

KEALY, Sean P. Mark’s Gospel: A History of Its Interpretation from the Beginning until 1979. New York: NY, Paulist Press 1982.

KEALY, Sean P. Mark’s Gospel: A History of Its Interpretation. New York: Paulist Press, 1983.

KELLY, Joseph F. “1996 NAPS Presidential Address on the Brink: Bede”, Journal of Early Christian Studies 1987, 5/1, pp. 85-103.

LAISTNER, Max Ludwig Wolfram. “Bede as a Classical and a Patristic Scholar”, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 1933, 16, pp. 69-93.

MORESCHINI, Claudio, NORELLI, Enrico. Historia de la literatura cristiana antigua griega y latina II. Madrid: BAC, 2007.

RICE, Eugene F. Saint Jerome in the Renaissance. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1985.

SANDERS, Ed Parish, DAVIES, Margaret. Studying the Synoptic Gospels. London: SCM Press, 1989.

SCHILDGEN, Brenda D. Power and Prejudice: The Reception of the Gospel of Mark, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1999.

SMITH, Harold. “The Sources of Victor of Antioch’s Commentary on Mark”, JTS 1919, 19, pp.
350-370.

STORR, Gottlob Christian, Über den Zweck der evangelischen Geschichte und der Briefe Johannis. Tübingen, 1786.

STREETER, Burnett Hillman. The Four Gospels. A Study of Origins, treating of the Manuscript Tradition, Sources, Authorship and Dates. London: Macmillan and Co., 1924.

TUCKETT, Christopher M. “Synoptic Problem”. In. FREEDMAN, David Noel (ed.), The Anchor Bible Dictionary VI. New York: Doubleday, 1992.