The right to disconnect or a corporate obligation of remote disconnection? Legislative challenges from a work perspective

Main Article Content

Montse Sole-Truyols

This article is based on the idea that work in a digital environment does not modify the nature of the work relationship. From this perspective, it argues some of the reasons why flexibility cannot be considered an inherent characteristic of work with ICT devices. Insofar as that the right to disconnect aims to guarantee workers’ breaks without renouncing flexibility alters the correlation of rights and duties pertaining to the work contract and constitutes an inefficient measure in terms of the objective of rest.


Based on the idea that legislation around disconnection must maintain the foundations of the working relationship, the article uses a potential obligation of remote disconnection on the part of the employer as a case study for identifying the most significant challenges to which the law must respond. The idea is to advance in those relevant aspects in order for them to be useful for future measures.

Keywords
right to disconnect, work relationship, working day, digital work

Article Details

How to Cite
Sole-Truyols, Montse. “The right to disconnect or a corporate obligation of remote disconnection? Legislative challenges from a work perspective”. IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal, no. 36, doi:10.7238/idp.v0i36.397055.
Author Biography

Montse Sole-Truyols, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya

Associate professor of Law and Political Science Studies at the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. Degree in Catalonian Philology (2009) and Law (2011) from the Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Her research interests are focused on labour law compared particularly with that of Nordic countries, where she has undertaken several research stays in Norway and Sweden. Within this field, her main line of research is currently based on digital work and the analysis of legislative changes derived from new technologies. She is the author of various publications in Catalan and English, in various formats: book chapters and teaching manuals, all published by Thomson Reuters Aranzadi, as well as articles in scientific magazines. She has participated as a speaker in international conferences specializing in labour law, the most recent of which include: The individualisation of collective representation. Norway, Portugal and Spain alternatives of digital workers’ representation, presented at the International Conference organized by ADAPT in Bergamo (Italy) in November 2021, and Working time regulation in the Digital Environment: A fundamental must to avoid modern slavery, presented at the 19th ILERA World Congress, in Lund (Sweden) in June 2021.

References

BLAGOEV, B. et al. (2018). «Organizational working time regimes: Drivers, consequences and attempts to change patterns of excessive working hours». A: German Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 32(3-4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002218791408.

CHIUFFO, F.M. (2019). «The ‘Right to Disconnect’ or ‘How to Pull the Plug on Work’». A: SSRN. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3422283

CHUNG, H. (2017). «Work Autonomy, Flexibility and Work-Life Balance final report». A: KAR [en línia]. Disponible a: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/65922/. Universitat de Kent. [Data de consulta: 12 de febrer de 2022].

DAGNINO, E. (2020). «Working Anytime, Anywhere and Working Time Provisions. Insights from the Italian Regulation of Smart Working and the Right to Disconnect». A: E-Journal of International and Comparative and Labour Studies, vol. 9(3).

Eurofound (2021). Right to disconnect: Exploring company practices [en línia]. Disponible a: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2021/right-to-disconnect-exploring-company-practices. Luxemburg: Oficina de publicacions de la Unió Europea. [Data de consulta: 12 de febrer de 2022].

Eurofound (2020a). Regulations to address work–life balance in digital flexible working arrangements. New forms of employment series [en línia]. Disponible a: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2020/regulations-to-address-work-life-balance-in-digital-flexible-working-arrangements. Luxemburg: Oficina de publicacions de la Unió Europea. [Data de consulta: 12 de febrer de 2022].

Eurofound (2020b). Telework and ICT-based mobile work: Flexible working in the digital age. New forms of employment series [en línia]. Disponible a: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2020/telework-and-ict-based-mobile-work-flexible-working-in-the-digital-age. Luxemburg: Oficina de publicacions de la Unió Europea. [Data de consulta: 12 de febrer de 2022].

European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2021). Regulating telework in a post-COVID-19 Europe, [en línia]. Disponible a: https://euagenda.eu/upload/publications/telework--20post-covid.pdf. Luxemburg: Oficina de publicacions de la Unió Europea. [Data de consulta: 12 de febrer de 2022].

FERRANTE, V. (2019). «Between health and salary: The incomplete regulation of working time in European law». A: European Labour Law Journal, vol. 10(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952519886144.

GENIN, E. (2016). «Proposal for a Theoretical Framework for the Analysis of Time Porosity». A: International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, vol. 32(3).

GESUALDI-FECTEAU, D.; RICHARD, G. (2021). «L’hyperconnectivité professionnelle et le droit à la déconnexion et au repos: quel encadrement juridique?». A: Bernier, J. (ed.). L’intelligence artificielle et les mondes du travail. Perspectives sociojuridiques et enjeux éthiques. Paris: Les Presses de l’Université Laval. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1f2s22n.11.

GLOWACKA, M. (2021). «A little less autonomy? The future of working time flexibility and its límits». A: European Labour Law Journal, vol.12(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952520922246.

GONSALVES, L. (2020). «From Face Time to Flex Time: The Role of Physical Space in Worker Temporal Flexibility». A: Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 65(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839220907891.

GRAMANO, E. (2018). «Working Performance and Organisational Flexibility: At the Core of the Employment Contract». A: SSRN. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3118216.

GRIGORE, G. et al. (2021). «(Un)resolving digital technology paradoxes through the rhetoric of balance». A: Organization, vol. 28(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420968196

JAUCH, M. (2020). «The rat race and working time regulation». A: Politics, Philosophy & Economics, vol. 19(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X20927894.

KATSABIAN, T. (2021). «The Rule of Technology – How Technology Is Used to Disturb Basic Labor Law Protections». A: Lewis & Clark Law Review, vol. 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3758389.

LEROUGE, L. (2017). «Le droit à la déconnexion “à la française”». A: Noticias Cielo, núm. 1, [en línia]. Disponible a: http://www.cielolaboral.com/francais-le-droit-a-la-deconnexion-a-la-francaise/. [Data de consulta: 12 de febrer de 2022].

LOTT, Y. (2015). «Working-time flexibility and autonomy: A European perspective on time adequacy». A: European Journal of Industrial Relations, vol. 21(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680114543604.

MAZMANIAN, M. et al. (2013). «The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals». A: Organization Science, vol. 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0806.

MCGAUGHEY, E. (2018). «Taylorooism: when network technology meets corporate power». A: Industrial Relations Journal, vol. 49(5-6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12228.

MITRUS, L. (2019). «Potential implications of the Matzak judgment (quality of rest time, right to disconnect)». A: European Labour Law Journal, vol. 10(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952519886149

MOREL, L. (2017). «Le droit à la déconnexion en droit français. La question de l’effectivité du droit au repos à l’ère du numérique». A: Labour & Law Issues, vol. 3(2).

OIT (1919). First annual meeting. October 29, 1919 [en línia]. Disponible a: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=bc.ark:/13960/t6356964q&view=1up&seq=7. Washington D.C. [Data de consulta: 12 de febrer de 2022].

OIT (1920). The Labour Provisions of the Peace Treaties [en línia]. Disponible a: https://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/1920/20B09_18_engl.pdf. Ginebra. [Data de consulta: 12 de febrer de 2022].

RUSSO, M. (2020). «Esiste il diritto alla disconnessione? Qualche spunto di riflessione alla ricerca di un equilibrio tra tecnologia, lavoro e vita privata». A: Diritto delle relazioni industriali: rivista della Associazione lavoro e riceche, vol. 30(3).

SHEVCHUK, A. et al. (2019). «The Autonomy Paradox: How Night Work Undermines Subjective Well-Being of Internet-Based Freelancers». A: ILR Review, vol.72(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793918767114.

STONE, K. (2004). From Widgets to Digits: Employment Regulation for the Changing Workplace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617089

VON BERGEN, C. W.; BRESSLER, M. (2019). «Work, Non-Work Boundaries and the Right to Disconnect». A: The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, vol. 21(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v21i1.1454.

ZUCARO, R. (2019). «The right to disconnect. Protection profiles». A: Labour & Law Issues, vol. 5(2).