Taxonomy of violent communication and the discourse of hate on the internet
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Even though the Law has always focused on words that are offensive and damaging, and which convey hate or incite to violence, during the last few years there has been a growing preoccupation with the capacity of cyberspace to augment the harmful effect of some expressions or forms of violent communication. This paper approaches the topic beginning with the observation and analysis of more than 250,000 tweets published in Spanish after the Paris attacks that victimized those responsible for the satirical French weekly Charlie Hebdo and its workers. After several screenings and readings of the tweets, the different typologies of communication with violent and hate content have been identified and this has allowed for the construction of a Taxonomy of Violent Communication and Hate Speech on the Internet. Also, the results of prevalence studies are analysed and they demonstrate firstly that the nature of violent communication on the Internet is testimonial, even in violent events such as those analysed; secondly that the most serious forms are less representative than other forms of expression of bad taste or that impact social sensibility, and finally that hate speech has a relevant presence even if it does not represent the majority of the expressions tweeted during the event.
Article Details
Copyright
Contents published in IDP are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Spain licence, the full text of which can be consulted on http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/es/deed.en.
Thus, they may be copied, distributed and broadcast provided that the author and IDP are cited, as shown in the recommended citation that accompanies each article. Derivative works are not permitted.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.
Assignment of intellectual property rights
The author non exclusively transfers the rights to use (reproduce, distribute, publicly broadcast or transform) and market the work, in full or part, to the journal’s editors in all present and future formats and modalities, in all languages, for the lifetime of the work and worldwide.
The author must declare that he is the original author of the work. The editors shall thus not be held responsible for any obligation or legal action that may derive from the work submitted in terms of violation of third parties’ rights, whether intellectual property, trade secret or any other right.
Fernando Miró Llinares, Universitat Miguel Hernández
Catedràtic acreditat de Dret Penal
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Fernando Miró Llinares, Crime, cyberspace and Covid-19: (accelerated) displacement of opportunities and situational adaptation of cybercrime , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 32 (2021): March
- Fernando Miró Llinares, Predictive policing: utopia or dystopia? On attitudes towards the use of big data algorithms for law enforcement , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 30 (2020)
- Fernando Miró Llinares, Criminal law, cyberbullying and other forms of (non-sexual) harassment in cyberspace , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 16 (2013)
Similar Articles
- Jesús C. Aguerri, Fernando Miró-Llinares, Offensive and hateful communication or programmed disinformation? , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 37 (2023): March
- David Comet-Herrera, Lucía Benítez-Eyzaguirre, The Spanish state’s virtual public procurement platforms and their transparency on the consideration of strategic procurement criteria , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 40 (2024): March
- Patricia Boyer Escudero, Neighbourhood disputes and alternative methods of conflict resolution during the first State of Emergency due to COVID-19 in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 35 (2022): March
- Göran Rollnert Liern, Social networks and hate speech: an international perspective , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 31 (2020)
- Mario Santisteban Galarza, Jesús C. Aguerri, Does ChatGPT-4 dream of offensive tweets? An approximation to the potential contributions of generative models in detecting illicit speeches , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 39 (2023): November. Special issue: "Digitization and algorithmization of justice"
- Serguei Komissarov, Journalistic editors vs. digital platforms: competition policy for the editing industry , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 36 (2022): October
- Eva María Valverde Picado, Amaia Yurrebaso Macho, Raquel Guzmán Ordaz, Social response to aporophobia: challenges in social intervention , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 37 (2023): March
- Raquel Seijas, European solutions to disinformation and how they may impact on fundamental rights , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 31 (2020)
- Gergely Ferenc Lendvai, Gergely Gosztonyi, Deepfake and disinformation – What can the law do about fake news created with deepfake? , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 41 (2024): October
- Ignacio Álvarez Rodríguez, An Analysis of Cyberspace Law , IDP. Internet, Law and Politics E-Journal: No. 30 (2020)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.