Curricular progressions for learning about —and through— oral argumentation in compulsory secondary education

Main Article Content

Daniel Mauricio Rodríguez León
Results of an investigation on progressions prescribed through a curriculum for the learning of oral argumentation in compulsory secondary education in Catalonia (ESO) are presented. The objective of the study is to assess the type and quality of the resources provided in the language curriculum to promote oral argumentation learning aims that students will have to master at the end of ESO. The results indicate that, although the Catalan curriculum offers more and better progressions than the Spanish framework on which it is based, in both there are gaps and ruptures in the passage from the first to the second cycle of ESO, as well as ambiguities and theoretical inaccuracies between the contents on oral argumentation that serve as an object and as a means of learning in this school stage.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rodríguez León, Daniel Mauricio. “Curricular progressions for learning about —and through— oral argumentation in compulsory secondary education”. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, vol.VOL 13, no. 4, p. e879, doi:10.5565/rev/jtl3.879.
Author Biography

Daniel Mauricio Rodríguez León, Universidad del Quindío

Doctor en Educación por la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, título al que optó en 2019 con la tesis Bases didáctico-curriculares para la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de la argumentación oral en la educación media. Hace parte del grupo de investigación DiLeMa de la Universidad del Quindío, institución donde trabaja como profesor del área de Didáctica de las primeras lenguas. Actualmente investiga sobre argumentación oral en el contexto de la formación básica docente, las políticas curriculares y la tradición didáctica en oralidad.