El disseny d'aprenentatge aplicat a l'ensenyament jurídic i el diagrama de Venn

Article Sidebar

Accés (Castellano)

Main Article Content

Wellington Migliari
Universitat de Barcelona
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1073-1312

Aquest article té com a objectiu avaluar la utilitat del disseny d’aprenentatge com a metodologia activa en l’ensenyament universitari del Dret, especialment en contextos que requereixen una comprensió conceptual més gran. L’evidència que motiva aquest estudi parteix de la dificultat habitual de l’alumnat per identificar i transferir principis jurídics complexos a l’assignatura Règim Jurídic dels Empleats Públics, impartida al grau de Relacions Laborals de la Universitat de Barcelona. Per abordar aquesta situació, es va dissenyar una intervenció docent basada en l’ús del diagrama de Venn com a eina visual de suport a l’aprenentatge, aplicada mitjançant un simulacre pràctic. Els resultats mostren que els estudiants que van utilitzar el diagrama (Model A) van assolir un nivell superior de comprensió i de transferència conceptual en comparació amb aquells que no el van utilitzar (Model B). Així mateix, es va observar un augment en la participació de l’alumnat i en la generació de metadades sobre el seu rendiment acadèmic, fet que reforça el valor pedagògic d’integrar tecnologies visuals en el disseny d’activitats jurídiques. Aquestes evidències suggereixen que el disseny d’aprenentatge, combinat amb representacions gràfiques, contribueix significativament a millorar l’ensenyament del Dret en entorns universitaris.

Paraules clau
diagrama de Venn, metodologia, disseny d’aprenentatge, educació superior, participació

Article Details

Com citar
Migliari, Wellington. «El disseny d’aprenentatge aplicat a l’ensenyament jurídic i el diagrama de Venn». Revista de educación y derecho, 2025, núm. 32, doi:10.1344/REYD2025.32.50613.
Drets
Creative Commons License

Aquesta obra està sota una llicència internacional Creative Commons Reconeixement 4.0.

(c) Wellington Migliari, 2025


Drets d'autor

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.

Texts will be published under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, provided they include an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship, its initial publication in this journal and the terms of the license.

Biografia de l'autor/a

Wellington Migliari, Universitat de Barcelona

Professor de Dret administratiu.

Referències

Aditomo, A., Goodyear, P., Bliuc, A., y Ellis, R. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in higher education: Principal forms, educational objectives, and disciplinary variations. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1239-1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.616584

Aditomo, A., y Klieme, E. (2020). Forms of inquiry-based science instruction and their relations with learning outcomes: Evidence from high and low-performing education systems. International Journal of Science Education, 42(4), 504-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1716093

Alba Pastor, C. (2019). Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje: un modelo teórico-práctico para una educación inclusiva de calidad. Participación Educativa, 6(9), 55-68. https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/dam/jcr:c8e7d35c-c3aa-483d-ba2e-68c22fad7e42/pe-n9-art04-carmen-alba.pdf

Allan, C. N., Campbell, C., y Crough, J. (2019). Blended learning designs in STEM higher education: Putting Learning First (1st ed.). Springer Singapore Pte. Limited. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6982-7

Balloo, K., Evans, C., Hughes, A., Zhu, X., y Winstone, N. (2018). Transparency isn’t spoon-feeding: how a transformative approach to the use of explicit assessment criteria can support student self-regulation. Frontiers in Education, 3(69), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00069

Bartel, A. N., Lande, K. J., Roos, J., y Schloss, K. B. (2022). A holey perspective on Venn diagrams. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 46(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13073

Bovill, C. (2013). An investigation of co-created curricula within higher education in the UK, Ireland and the USA. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.770264

Bovill, C., y Bulley, C. J. (2011). A model of active student participation in curriculum design: exploring desirability and possibility. En C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning (ISL) (pp. 176-188). Oxford Brookes University: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.

Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in learning and teaching: The case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education, 79, 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w

Brooman, S., Darwent, S., y Pimor, A. (2014). The student voice in higher education curriculum design: Is there value in listening?. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(6), 663-674. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.910128

Brooman, S., y Stirk, S. (2020). Who am I?: Using reflective practice and self-determination to redefine ‘employability’ in legal education. Liverpool Law Review, 41, 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-020-09240-5

Castañeda, L., y Adell, J. (Eds.). (2013). Entornos personales de aprendizaje: Claves para el ecosistema educativo en red. Alcoy: Marfil.

Cîineanu, M., Dulamă, M. E., Ilovan, O., Rus, G. M., Kobulniczky, B., Voicu, C., y Chiș, O. (2021). Using the Venn diagram for developing university students’ analytical geographical thinking. En I. Albulescu, y N. Stan (Eds.), Education, reflection, development – ERD 2020 (pp. 238-247). European Publisher. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.03.02.26

Conole, G. (2013). Las pedagogías de los entornos personales de aprendizaje. En L. Castañeda y J. Adell (Eds.), Entornos personales de aprendizaje: Claves para el ecosistema educativo en red (pp. 185-188). Alcoy: Marfil.

Conole, G. (2014). Designing for learning in an open world (1st ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8517-0

Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., y Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Jossey Bass.

Downey, R. M., Downey, K. B., Jacobs, J., Korthas, H., Melchor, G. S., Speidell, A., Waguespack, H., Mulroney, S. E., y Myers, A. K. (2022). Learning design in science education: Perspectives from designing a graduate-level course in evidence-based teaching of science. Advances in Physiology Education, 46(4), 651–657. https://doi.org/10.1152/ADVAN.00069.2022

Ellis, R., y Goodyear, P. (2010). Students’experiences of e-learning in higher education. The ecology of sustainable innovation. Routledge.

Freire, P. (1997). Pedagogía de la autonomía: Saberes necesarios para la práctica educativa. Siglo Veintiuno de España.

Goodyear, P., y Dimitriadis, Y. (2013). In medias res: Reframing design for learning. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.19909

Gundlach, J. A., y Santangelo, J. R. (2019). Teaching and assessing metacognition in law school. Journal of Legal Education, 69(1), 156–199. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27073483

Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching: Exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. En R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 67-78). McGraw Hill/ Open University Press.

Healey, M., Flint, A., y Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Academy.

Hervey, T., Cryer, R. & Sokhi-Bulley, B (2007). Legal research methodologies in European Union & International Law: Research notes (Part 2). Journal of Contemporary European Research, 3(2), 161-165. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v3i2.50

Hervey, T., Cryer, R. & Sokhi-Bulley, B (2008). Legal research methodologies in European Union & International Law: Research notes (Part 2). Journal of Contemporary European Research, 4(1), 48-51. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v4i1.96

Hews, R., Beligatamulla, G., y McNamara, J. (2023). Creative confidence and thinking skills for lawyers: Making sense of design thinking pedagogy in legal education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101352

Irgens, G. A., Adisa, I., Bailey, C., y Quesada, H. V. (2022). Designing with and for youth: A participatory design research approach for critical machine learning education. Educational Technology & Society, 25(4), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202210_25(4).0010

Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking Technology: Toward a constructivist design model. Educational Technology, 34(4), 34-37. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/171050/

Könings, K. D., Seidel, T., y Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2014). Participatory design of learning environments: Integrating perspectives of students, teachers, and designers. Instructional Science, 42, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9305-2

Larson, J. (2018). Getting up to speed: Understanding the connection between learning outcomes and assessments in a doctrinal course, NYLS Law Review, 62(1), 11-62. https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1438&context=nyls_law_review

Melero, J., Hernández-Leo, D., y Blat, J. (2012). A review of constructivist learning methods with supporting tooling in ICT higher education: Defining different types of scaffolding. Journal of Universal Computer Science,18(16), 2334-2360. https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-018-16-2334

Mor, Y., Ferguson, R., y Wasson, B. (2015). Editorial: Learning design, teacher inquiry into student learning and learning analytics. A call for action. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12273

Mor, Y., y Mogilevsky, O. (2013). The learning design studio: Collaborative design inquiries as teachers’ professional development. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.22054

Morón, S. (2023). Derecho de la Función Pública. Editorial Tecnos.

Olson-Strom, S., y Rao, N. (2020). Higher education for women in Asia. En C. Sanger y N. Gleason (Eds.), Diversity and inclusion in global higher education (pp. 31-72). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1628-3_2

Pastor Durán, X., Lozano Rubí, R., y Gros Salvat, B. (2017). El aprendizaje basado en la indagación y el codiseño: Experiencia aplicada en el Grado de Ingeniería Biomédica. Cuadernos de Docencia Universitaria, 33, 1-46. https://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/145129/1/33cuaderno.pdf

Ponce Solé, J. (2023). Manual de fonaments del Dret Administratiu i de la gestió pública. Textos legals, materials per practicar, dades empíriques (4a ed.). Tirant lo Blanch.

Rodríguez Espinar, S. (2009). La investigación en docencia universitaria y los criterios de calidad en su difusión y reconocimiento. Revista de Educación y Derecho, 1, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1344/re&d.v0i01.2216

Sandel, M. (2020). The tyranny of merit: What’s become of the common good?. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Sanger, C.S. (2020). Inclusive pedagogy and universal design approaches for diverse learning environments. En C. Sanger y N. Gleason (Eds.), Diversity and inclusion in global higher education (pp. 31-72). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1628-3_2

Sato, Y., Mineshima, K., y Takemura, R. (2010, August 9-11). The efficacy of Euler and Venn diagrams in deductive reasoning: Empirical findings [Paper presentation]. Diagrammatic Representation and Inference 6th International Conference, Diagrams 2010, Porland, OR, United States. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-14600-8_6

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Yan, Z., y Carless, D. (2022). Self-assessment is about more than self: The enabling role of feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7), 1116-1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2001431

Zehner, F., y Hahnel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence on the advance to enhance educational assessment: Scientific clickbait or genuine game changer?, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(3), 695-702. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12744