The nature of the Triunviral Power in Macedonia the proconsulship of Lucius Cornelius Piso

Article Sidebar

pdf (Castellano)

Main Article Content

Carlos Heredia Chimeno
Kyoto Prefectural University

Lucius Calpurnius Piso's proconsulate in Macedonia (57-55 BCE) is well known to be part of the view of Cicero. This paper seeks to find out if the action of Piso reflects the triumviral power, within the framework of a mos maiorum of a new regime, in order to illuminate the decline narrative and the distorted perspective used by Cicero.

Keywords
Lucius Cornelius Piso, First triumvirate, Mos maiorum, Decline narratives, Cicero

Article Details

How to Cite
Heredia Chimeno, Carlos. “The nature of the Triunviral Power in Macedonia: the proconsulship of Lucius Cornelius Piso”. Karanos. Bulletin of Ancient Macedonian Studies, vol.VOL 2, pp. 55-74, https://raco.cat/index.php/karanos/article/view/373509.
Rights

Copyright

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright.
  2. The texts published in this journal are – unless indicated otherwise – covered by the Creative Commons Spain Attribution 4.0 licence. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s). The full text of the licence can be consulted here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
ABE, T. (2017): “Ancient Construction of Decline-Narratives”, in T. MINAMIKAWA (ed.): Decline and Decline-narratives in the Greek and Roman World, Kioto: 43-44.

ALCALDE, C. - GONZÁLEZ, M. (2010): Plutarco: Vidas Paralelas VIII, Madrid.

AMSDEN, D. M. (1970): Debt and Politics in the Age of Cicero, Ann Arbor.

ARENA, V. (2010): “Mos Maiorum”, in. M. BEVIR (ed.): Encyclopedia of Political Theory 1, Berkeley: 40-41.

ARENA, V. (2015): “Informal Norms, Values, and Social Control in the Roman Participatory Context”, in D. HAMMER (ed.): A Companion to Greek Democracy and the Roman Republic, Cambridge: 217-238.

ASSENMAKER, P. (2013): “L. Sulla imperator' et 'imperator iterum': pour une réévaluation de la chronologie des émissions monétaires de Sylla (RRC 367-368 et 359)”, Revue Numismatique 170: 247-277.

ASSENMAKER, P. (2017): “Les grandes individus dans les guerres civiles: une nouvelle architecture normative?”, in T. ITGENSHORST, P. LE DOZE (ed.): Les normes sous la République et le Haut-Empire romains. Élaboration, diffusion et contournements, Burdeos: 463-481.

BABEAU, O. (2007): Le Manager et la Transgression Ordinaire des Regles: le cas des societes de conseil en management. Gestion et management, París.

BAÑOS, J. (1994): Cicerón: Discursos IV, Madrid.

BATSTONE, W. (2010): “Word at War: the Prequel”, in B. BREED, C. DAMON, A. ROSSI (eds.): Citizens of Discord, Rome and Its Civil Wars, Oxford-Nueva York.

BENNER, H. (1987): Die Politik des P. Clodius Pulcher, Stuttgart.

BETTINI, M. (2006): “A proposito dei ‘buoni costumi’. Mos, mores e mos maiorum”, in F.M. SIMÓN, et al. (eds.): Repúblicas y ciudadanos: modelos de participación cívica en el mundo antiguo, Barcelona: 191-206.

BETTINI, M. (2011): “Mos, Mores, and Mos Maiorum: the invention of morality in Roman Culture”, in M. BETTINI (ed.): The Ears of Hermes: Communication, Images, and Identity in the Classical World, Columbia: 87-130.

BLEICKEN, J. (1975): Lex Publica. Recht und Gesetz in der Romischen Republik, Berlín-Nueva York.

BLOCH, H. (1940): “L. Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus in Samothrace and Herculaneum”, American Journal of Archaeology 44: 485-493.

BLÖSEL, W. (2000): “Die Geschichte des Begriffes mos maiorum von den Anfängen bis zu Cicero”, in B. LINKE i M. STEMMLER (eds.): Mos Maiorum: Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der Römischen Republik, Stuttgart: 25-98.

BRIOT, P. (1968): “Sur l’exil de Cicéron”, Latomus 27: 406-414.

BROEGE, V. A. (1968): The Political Career of Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus, Ann Arbor.

BRUNT, A. (1987): Italian Manpower 225 BC-AD 14, Oxford.

CLAYMORE, J. (2011): Post Reditum: Cicero’s Forensic Repositioning, Gainesville.

COBBAN, J. M. (1935): Senate and Provinces 78-49 B.C., Cambridge.

CUADRADO, E. (2003): Cicerón: Discursos VIII, Madrid.

DELACY, P. (1941): “Cicero’s Invective against Piso”, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 72: 49-58.

DROGULA, F. K. (2005): The Office of the Provincial Governor under the Roman Republic and Empire (to AD 235). Conception and Tradition, Charlottesville.

DUGAN, J. (2001): “How to Make (and Break) a Cicero: Epideixis, Textuality, and Self-fashioning in the Pro Archia and In Pisonem”, CA 20: 35-77.

DUPLÁ, A. (2007): “Interpretaciones de la crisis tardorrepublicana: del conflicto social a la articulación del consenso”, Studia historica 25: 185-201.

FLOWER, H. (2010): Roman Republics, Princeton.

GRIMAL, P. (1966): “Le contenu historique du Contre Pison”, Comptes rendus des séances de l'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 1: 95-107.

GRUEN, E. (1966): “P. Clodius: Instrument or Independent Agent?”, Phoenix 20: 120-130.

GRUEN, E. (1969): “Pompey, the Roman Aristocracy, and the Conference of Luca”, Historia 18: 71-108.

GRUEN, E. (1974): The Last Generation of the Roman Republic, Berkeley.

GRUMMEL, W. C. (1949): The Life and Political Career of L. Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus, Nueva York.

GRUMMEL, W. C.(1954): “The Consular Elections of 59 B.C.”, The Classical Journal 48: 351-354.

HANSLIK, R. (1955): “Cicero un das erste Triumvirat”, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 98: 324-334.

HIN, S. (2013): The Demography of Roman Italy, Cambridge.

HJORT, C. (2016): Triumphus in the Age of Civil War. The Late Republic and the Adaptability of Triumphal Tradition, Londres.

HOABY, S. E. (2011): Ideologies in the Roman Civil War, Los Ángeles.

HÖLKESKAMP, K. J. (2010): Reconstructing the Roman Republic: an Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research, Princeton.

HUGHES, J. T. (1988): “Invective and Comedie Allusion: Cicero, ‘in Pisonem’, fragment 9 (Nisbet)”, Latomus 57: 570-577.

HURLET, F. (1997): Les Collègues du Prince sous Auguste et Tibère. Roma.

HURLET, F. (2017): “La dualité du consulat à l’épreuve de la longue duréé. À propos de la transgression et du contournement de la norme”, in T. ITGENSHORST, P. LE DOZE (eds.): Les normes sous la République et le Haut-Empire romains. Élaboration, diffusion et contournements, Burdeos: 283-299.

ITGENSHORST, T. (2005): Tota illa pompa: der Triumph in der Römischen Republik, Göttingen.

JAMESON, S. (1970): “Pompey's Imperium in 67: Some Constitutional Fictions”, Historia 19: 539-60.

JUDITH, D. (2015): Violence and Criminality in the Ancient Roman World, Chicago.

KENDALL, S. (2013): The Struggle for Roman Citizenship. Romans, Allies, and the Wars of 91-77 BCE, Piscataway.

KUNKEL, W. (1972): “Magistratische Gewalt und Senatscherrschaft”, ANRW 1.2: 3-22.

LACEY, W. K. (1996): Augustus and the Principate: The Evolution of the System, Wiltshire.

LINDERSKI, J. (1965): “Constitutional Aspects of the Consular Elections in 59 B.C.”, Historia 14: 423-442.

LINTOTT, A. W. (1999): The Constitution of the Roman Republic, Oxford.

LUNDGREEN, C. (2017), “Norme, loi, règle, coutume, tradition: terminologie antique et perspectives modernes”, in T. ITGENSHORST, P. LE DOZE (eds.): Les normes sous la République et le Haut-Empire romains. Élaboration, diffusion et contournements, Burdeos: 17-33.

MARSHALL, A. J. (1966): “Governors on the Move”, Phoenix 20: 231-246.

MATTHEWS, E. (1939): “The Career of Aulus Gabinius”, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 70: 64-92.

MITCHELL, T. N. (1986): “The Leges Clodiae and obnuntiatio”, CQ 36: 172-176.

MOMMSEN, T. (1888): Römisches Staatsrecht 3, Leipzig.

MORSTEIN, R. (2004): Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic, Cambridge.

NISBET, R. G. M. (1961): M. Tulli Ciceronis in L. Calpurnium Pisonem oratio, Oxford.

NORTH, J. A. (2006): “The Constitution of the Roman Republic”, en N. ROSENTEIN, R. MORSTEIN (eds.): Companion of the Roman Republic, Oxford: 256-277.

PINA POLO, F. (2011): The Consul at Rome: the Civil Functions of the Consuls in Roman Republic, Cambridge.

PINARD, W. G. (1976): Clodius’ Tribunate, Ottawa.

PUGH, D. W. (1981): Some Aspects of the Political Career of Marcus Licinius Crassus, St. Andrews.

ROBINSON, A. W. (1986): Cicero’s Use of People as Exempla in his Speeches, Bloomington.

RODRÍGUEZ, M. (1996): Cicerón: Cartas II, Madrid.

RYAN, F. X. (1996): “Bibulus as President of the Senate”, Latomus 55: 384-388.

SANCHO, A. (1985): Apiano: Guerras Civiles, Madrid.

SIMÓN, F. M. (2011): “The Feriae Latinae as Religious Legitimation of the Consuls’ imperium”, in H. BECK, A. DUPLÁ, M. JEHNE, F. PINA POLO (eds.): Consuls and Res Publica, Cambridge: 116-132.

STEEL, C. (2007): “Name and Shame? Invective against Clodius and others in the post-exile speeches”, in J. BOOTH (ed.): Cicero on the Attack, Swansea: 105-128.

STEEL, C. (2014): “The Roman Senate and the Post-Sullan Res Publica”, Historia 63: 323-339.

SYME, R. (2002): The Roman Revolution, Oxford.

TATUM, W. J. (1986): P. Clodius Pulcher: the Rise to Power, Austin.

TAYLOR, L. R. (1968): “The Dating of Major Legislation and Elections in Caesar’s First Consulship”, Historia 17: 173-193.

TUORI, K. (2016): The Emperor of Law: the Emergence of Roman Imperial Adjudication, Oxford.

VAN DER BLOM, H. (2010): Cicero’s Role Models. The Political Strategy of a Newcomer, Oxford.

WALLACE, A. (1997): “Mutatio morum: the Idea of a Cultural Revolution”, in T. HABINEK, A. SCHIESARO (eds.): The Roman Cultural Revolution, Cambridge: 3-22.