What’s the matter with |U| and |I|? On nasal vowel diphthongization and element asymmetry

Main Article Content

Heglyn Pimenta
In Element-Theory and similar approaches to the internal structure of segments, it is often assumed that the aperture element |A| is more sonorous and different in kind from the coloring elements |I| and |U| (Hulst 2015; Pöchtrager 2006; Schane 1984), while the latter are usually considered to be equally sonorous and display symmetrical behavior. As it has been previously noted, though, this formulation misses a recurrent crosslinguistic asymmetry. |I| and |U| do in fact have distinct behaviors (Carvalho & Klein 1996, Nevins 2012, Veloso 2013, Pimenta 2019), and while typologically, rounding can be absent from a language inventory, “no language has been found that lacks both a front vowel and palatal glide” (Hyman 2008: 100, n. 11). As will be shown, this asymmetry is the source of several phenomena in Portuguese phonology, both synchronic and diachronic. Special attention will be given to nasal vowel diphthongization in non-standard European Portuguese, which reveals a preference for the front offglide over the back offglide, [j] appearing even in some contexts where [w] would be expected. This preference, as will be argued, has its origin in sonority asymmetry, |I| being less sonorous than |U|.
Keywords
element theory, element asymmetry, nasality, diphthongization, Portuguese

Article Details

How to Cite
Pimenta, Heglyn. “What’s the matter with |U| and |I|? : On nasal vowel diphthongization and element asymmetry ”. Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics, 2022, vol.VOL 8, no. 2, pp. 1-18, doi:10.5565/rev/isogloss.123.
Author Biography

Heglyn Pimenta, Université de Tours

Temporary Research Assistant and Assistant Lecturer (ATER) in Linguistics at the University of Tours (France). Currently associated with the research unit Imagerie et cerveau (UMR 1253 iBrain).
References

Backley, Phillip. 2011. An introduction to element theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Battisti, Elisa. 2014. A representação da nasal em coda silábica e os ditongos nasais do português. In XVII Congresso Internacional Associação de Linguística e Filologia da América Latina (ALFAL), 1433–1453. João Pessoa (Paraíba, Brasil). http://www.mundoalfal.org/CDAnaisXVII/anais.html.

Bisol, Leda. 2013. Fonologia da nasalização. In Maria Bernadete M. Abaurre (ed.), Gramática do português culto falado no Brasil vol. VII, 113–140. São Paulo: Contexto.

Carvalho, Joaquim Brandão de. 2013. Why there is no backness: the case for dismissing both [coronal] and [dorsal]. In Jean-Léo Léonard & Samia Naïm (eds.), Base articulatoire arrière. Backing and Backness (Studies in Phonology 01), 45–58. Munich: Lincom.

Carvalho, Joaquim Brandão de & Marc Klein. 1996. A subsymbolic approach to phonological primitives. In Jacques Durand & Bernard Laks (eds.), Current Trends in Phonology: Models and Methods, 97–121. Salford, Manchester: ESRI.

Charette, Monik & Asli Göksel. 1994. Switching and Vowel Harmony in Turkic languages. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics (4). 31–52.

Donegan, Patricia J. 1978. On the natural phonology of vowels (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics). New York: Garland Pub.

Harris, John. 2006. The phonology of being understood: Further arguments against sonority. Lingua (Language in Mind: A Tribute to Neil Smith on the Occasion of His Retirement) 116(10). 1483–1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.07.009.

Harris, John & Geoff Lindsey. 1995. The elements of phonological representation. In Jacques Durand & Francis Katamba (eds.), Frontiers of phonology: atoms, structures, derivations, 34–79. Harlow, Essex: Longman

.

van der Hulst, Harry. 1989. Atoms of Segmental Structure: Components, Gestures and Dependency. Phonology 6(2). 253–284. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700001020.

van der Hulst, Harry. 2015. The Opponent Principle in RcvP. Binarity in a Unary System. In Eric Raimy & Charles E. Cairns (eds.), The Segment in Phonetics and Phonology, 149–179. London: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700001020.

Hyman, Larry M. 2008. Universals in phonology. The Linguistic Review. De Gruyter Mouton 25(1–2). 83–137. https://doi.org/10.1515/TLIR.2008.003. https://doi.org/10.1515/TLIR.2008.003.

Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1985. The internal structure of phonological elements : a theory of charm and government. In Colin Ewen & John Anderson (eds.), Phonology Yearbook, vol. 2, 305–328. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kubozono, Haruo. 2001. On the markedness of diphthongs. Kobe Papers in Linguistics 3. 60–73.

Maia, Clarinda de Azevedo. 1981. Geografia dialectal e história do português: resultados da terminação latina -ANA. Sep. de Biblos (Coimbra) 57. 73–96.

Nevins, Andrew. 2012. Vowel lenition and fortition in Brazilian Portuguese. Letras de Hoje 47(3). 228–233.

Ohala, John J. & James Lorentz. 1977. The Story of [w]: An Exercise in the Phonetic Explanation for Sound Patterns. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 3(3). https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v3i0.2264.

Pimenta, Heglyn. 2019. Nasalité et syllabe : Une étude synchronique, diachronique et dialectologique du portugais européen. Université Paris 8 PhD.

Pöchtrager, Markus A. 2006. The structure of length. Vienna, Austria: Universität Wien PhD.

Pöchtrager, Markus A. 2015. Binding in Phonology. In H. van Riemsdijk & Marc van Oostendorp (eds.), Representing Structure in Phonology and Syntax, 255–275. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501502224-011.

Sampson, Rodney. 1999. Nasal Vowel Evolution in Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sánchez Miret, Fernando. 1998. Some reflections on the notion of diphthong. Papers and studies in contrastive linguistics 34. 27–51.

Saramago, João. 2006. O atlas linguístico-etnográfico de Portugal e da Galiza (ALEPG). Estudis Romànics XXVIII. 281–298.

Schane, Sanford A. 1984. The Fundamentals of Particle Phonology. In Phonology Yearbook, vol. 1, 129–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700000324.

Scheer, Tobias. 1998. La structure interne des consonnes. In Patrick Sauzet (ed.), Langues et grammaire II - III : phonologie (Documents de Travail - Langues et Grammaire), 140–172. Paris: Université Paris 8.

Teyssier, Paul. 1980. Histoire de la langue portugaise (Que Sais-Je? 1864). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Veloso, João. 2013. Redução do vocalismo átono do português europeu contemporâneo: Assimetria dos elementos de tonalidade e interação entre diversos tipos de redução vocálica. In Textos selecionados, 655–672. Coimbra: APL.

Veloso, João. 2019. Complex Segments in Portuguese: The Unbearable Heaviness of Being Palatal. In Bihotz ahots. M. L. Oñederra irakaslearen omenez, 513–526. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.

Vigário, Marina, Fernando Martins & Sónia Frota. 2006. A ferramenta FreP e a frequência de tipos silábicos e classes de segmentos no Português. In Textos Seleccionados do XXI Encontro da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, 675–687. Lisbon: Colibri.