The international order from an Asian perspective: the importance of global understanding

Main Article Content

Seán Golden
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2343-2802

Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, nº 134, p. 103-118
Quadrimestral (May-Setembre 2023)
ISSN:1133-6595 | E-ISSN:2013-035X
DOI: doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2023.133.2.103


With the Western order in crisis, the centre of gravity in terms of demographics and global trade has shifted to Asia. But this geopolitical area did not define the current world order nor is there an alternative yet. The non-Western Rest no longer shares a Western perception of geopolitics that thwarts its own development. Growing neonationalism and the prioritisation of domestic policy favours geostrategic rivalry, obstructing cooperation and a constructive international dynamic on every front. Contradictory ways of defining the terms of the debate lead to discrepancies that hinder the resolution of conflicts. From a constructivist approach, it is necessary to deconstruct the discourses on geopolitical power, which have been hijacked by realism. Understanding the underlying political philosophies of the Rest could facilitate a constructive debate on the nature of the emerging world order and how it might be organised.


>> The full text articles of this issue are available only in Spanish language

Keywords
geopolitics, world order, strategic autonomy, systemic rivalry, civic discourse, the West versus the Rest, Asia, international relations

Article Details

How to Cite
Golden, Seán. “The international order from an Asian perspective: the importance of global understanding”. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, no. 134, pp. 103-18, doi:10.24241/rcai.2023.134.2.103.
References
Cassam, Quassim. «Epistemic Insouciance». Journal of Philosophical Research, vol. 43, (2018), p. 1-20 (en línea) https://www.pdcnet.org/jpr/content/jpr_2018_0043_0001_0020

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Londres: Continuum Publishing Group, 1975.

Golden, Seán. «How to Construct a Common and Consensual Multicultural Civic Discourse». Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 46, n.o 5 (2020), p. 576-590.

Golden, Seán. «Roles and rights in the context of just governance and just social mores». Philosophy and Social Criticism, vol. 49, n.o 5 (2023), p. 554-567.

Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.

Khanna, Parag. «Connectivity and strategy: A response to Robert Kaplan». CNAS – Center for a New American Security, (2017) (en línea) https://stories.cnas.org/connectivity-and-strategy-a-response-to-robert-kaplan

Martin, Mícheál. «RIA International Affairs Conference - Tánaiste’s Keynote Address». DFA – Department of Foreign Affairs, (2 de mayo de 2023) (en línea) https://www.dfa.ie/news-and-media/press-releases/press-release-archive/2023/may/ria-international-affairs-conference---tanaistes-keynote-address.php

Menon, Shivshankar. «Nobody Wants the Current World Order. How All the Major Powers—Even the United States—Became Revisionists». Foreign Affairs, (3 de agosto de 2022) (en línea) https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/nobody-wants-current-world-order

Morillas, Pol y Cusiné, Sira. «War and Peace in the 21st Century. China and the US: Can Bipolar Confrontation Be Avoided?». CIDOB Briefings, n.o 45 (abril de 2023) (en línea) https://www.cidob.org/publicaciones/serie_de_publicacion/cidob_briefings/war_and_peace_in_the_21st_century_china_and_the_us_can_bipolar_confrontation_be_avoided

Pathi, Krutika. «Group led by China and Russia criticises global institutions». Associated Press, (5 de mayo de 2023) (en línea) https://apnews.com/article/india-china-russia-sco-shanghai-cooperation-organization-01d474cdd3487d350cf1c8d1a8d938e7

Pozzebon, Stefano. «Trade and carbon credits, not Ukraine, lead the agenda at Lula - Xi talks», CNN, (13 de abril de 2023) (en línea) https://edition.cnn.com/2023/04/12/americas/brazil-china-lula-xi-talks-climate-intl-latam/index.html

Stiglitz, Joseph E. «The End of Neoliberalism and the Rebirth of History». Project Syndicate, (4 de noviembre de 2019) (en línea) https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/end-of-neoliberalism-unfettered-markets-fail-by-joseph-e-stiglitz-2019-11

USC US-China Institute. «Russia-China Joint Statement on International Relations», (4 de febrero de 2022) (en línea) https://china.usc.edu/russia-china-joint-statement-international-relations-february-4-2022

Von der Leyen, Ursula. «Speech by President von der Leyen on EU-China relations to the Mercator Institute for China Studies and the European Policy Centre». European Comission, (30 de marzo de 2023) (en línea) https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/speech_23_2063

Wang, Minmin. «Comparison of Chinese and American views on world opinion: a rhetorical study of media reports», en: Lu, Xing ; Jia, Wenshan y Heisey, D. Ray (eds.) Chinese communication studies. Westport y Londres: Ablex, 2002, p. 213-225.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.