Araujo, Theo; Helberger, Natali; Kruikemeier, Sanne y de Vreese, Claes H. «In AI We Trust? Perceptions about Automated Decision-Making by Artificial Intelligence». AI & Society, vol. 35, n.º 3 (2020), p. 611-623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w
Barona Vilar, Silvia. Algoritmización del derecho y de la justicia: De la inteligencia artificial a la Smart Justice. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 2021.
Bradford, Ben, Jackson, Jonathan y Hough, Mike. «Trust in Justice», en: Uslaner, Eric (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford University Press, 2016, p. 633-654.
Burrell, Jenna. «How the Machine ‘Thinks’: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms». Big Data & Society, vol. 3, n.º 1 (2016) (en línea) https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512
Cappelletti, Mauro. «Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes within the Framework of the World-Wide Access-to-Justice Movement». The Modern Law Review, vol. 56, n.º 3 (1993), p. 282-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1993.tb02673.x
Carvajal, Diana María Ramírez. Justicia Digital: una mirada internacional en época de crisis. Universidad de Salamanca, 2020.
Casarosa, Federica. «Online Auction Sites: An Example of Regulation in Electronic Communities?». European Review of Private Law, vol. 17, n.º 1 (2009), p. 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2009001
Casarosa, Federica. «Out-of-Court Dispute Settlement Mechanisms for Failures in Content Moderation Monograph on the Administration of Justice in a Digital Era». Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, vol. 14, n.º 3 (2023), p. 391-402.
Castelliano, Caio, y Aquino Guimaraes, Tomas. «Court Disposition Time in Brazil and in European Countries». Revista Direito GV, vol. 19, (2023), p. 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172202302
Castelvecchi, Davide. «Can We Open the Black Box of AI?» Nature News, vol. 538, n.º 7623 (5 de octubre de 2016) (en línea) https://www.nature.com/news/can-we-open-the-black-box-of-ai-1.20731
CEPEJ-European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice. «Special File - Report "European Judicial Systems - CEPEJ Evaluation Report - 2022 Evaluation Cycle (2020 Data)», (5 de octubre de 2022) (en línea) https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/special-file-report-european-judicial-systems-cepej-evaluation-report-2022-evaluation-cycle-2020-data-
Coglianese, Cary y Ben-Dor, Lavi M. «AI in Adjudication and Administration». Brooklyn Law Review, vol. 86, n.º 3 (2021), p. 791-838.
Comisión Europea. «Consumer Scoreboard», (27 de marzo de 2023) (en línea) https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_1891
Edwards, Lilian, y Michael Veale. «Enslaving the Algorithm: From a “Right to an Explanation” to a “Right to Better Decisions”?» IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 16, n.º 3 (2018), p. 46-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2018.2701152
Galanter, Marc. «Access to Justice in a World of Expanding Social Capability». Fordham Urban Law Journal, vol. 37, n.º 1 (2010), p. 115-128.
Garth, Bryant G. y Cappelletti, Mauro. «Access to Justice: The Newest Wave in the Worldwide Movement to Make Rights Effective». Buffalo Law Review, vol. 27, (1978), p. 181-292.
Gentile, Giulia. «AI in the Courtroom and Judicial Independence: An EU Perspective». EUIdeas, (22 de agosto de 2022) (en línea) https://euideas.eui.eu/2022/08/22/ai-in-the-courtroom-and-judicial-independence-an-eu-perspective/
Gentile, Giulia. «Artificial Intelligence and the Crises of Judicial Power: (Not) Cutting the Gordian Knot?», en: De Gregorio, Giovanni; Pollicino, Oreste y Valcke, Peggy (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Digital Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024 (en prensa) (en línea) https://ssrn.com/abstract=4731231
Glover, J. Maria. «Disappearing Claims and the Erosion of Substantive Law». Yale Law Journal, vol. 124, n.º 8 (2014), p. 3.052-3.093.
Innerarity, Daniel. «Predicting the past: a philosophical critique of predictive analytics». IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política, n.º 39 (2023), p. 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7238/idp.v0i39.409672
Katsh, Ethan. «Online dispute resolution: Some lessons from the e-commerce revolution». Northern Kentucky Law Review, vol 28, n.º 4 (2001), p. 810-821.
Katsh, Ethan y Rule, Colin. «What We Know and Need to Know about Online Dispute Resolution White Papers». South Carolina Law Review, vol. 67, n.º 2 (2015), p. 329-344.
Kleinberg, Jon; Ludwig, Jens; Mullainathan, Sendhil y Sunstein, Cass R. «Discrimination in the Age of Algorithms». Journal of Legal Analysis, vol. 10 (2018), p. 113-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laz001
Klonick, Kate. «The New Governors: The People, Rules, and Processes Governing Online Speech». Harvard Law Review, vol. 131, n.º 6 (2018), p. 1.599-1.670.
Koivisto, Ida. The Transparency Paradox. Oxford y Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2022.
Kontiainen, Laura; Koulu, Riikka y Sankari, Suvi. «Research Agenda for Algorithmic Fairness Studies: Access to Justice Lessons for Interdisciplinary Research». Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, (2022), p. 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.882134
Lorenzo Pérez, Cristina. «Inteligencia artificial en la Administración de Justicia: Regulación española y marco europeo e internacional. Proyectos desarrollados por el Ministerio de Justicia de España». Centro de Estudios Jurídicos, (marzo de 2022) (en línea) https://www.cej-mjusticia.es/sede/publicaciones/ver/13637
Delgado Martín, Joaquín. «Justicia, juicios telemáticos y ecnología para afrontar los efectos de la pandemia sobre la justicia». Asuntos Constucionales, vol. 1 (2021), p. 75-94.
Mora-Sanguinetti, Juan S. La factura de la injusticia. Madrid: Tecnos, 2022.
OCDE-Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico. «Government at a Glance 2021». OECD, (9 de julio de 2021) (en línea) https://doi.org/10.1787/1c258f55-en
Palmiotto, Francesca. «The Black Box on Trial: The Impact of Algorithmic Opacity on Fair Trial Rights in Criminal Proceedings», en: Ebers, Martin y Cantero Gamito, Marta (eds.) Algorithmic Governance and Governance of Algorithms: Legal and Ethical Challenges. Cham: Springer, 2021, p. 49-70.
Pilving, Ivo. «Guidance-Based Algorithms for Automated Decision-Making in Public Administration: The Estonian Perspective». CERIDAP, (20 de febrero de 2023) (en línea) https://doi.org/10.13130/2723-9195/2023-1-105
Re, Richard M. y Solow-Niederman, Alicia. «Developing Artificially Intelligent Justice». Stanford Technology Law Review, vol. 22, n.º 2 (2019) (en línea) https://law.stanford.edu/publications/developing-artificially-intelligent-justice-stanford-technology-law-review/
Susskind, Richard. Online Courts and the Future of Justice. Oxford y Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2021.
Wachter, Sandra; Mittelstadt, Brent y Russell, Chris. «Why fairness cannot be automated: Bridging the gap between EU non-discrimination law and AI». Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 41 (2021) (en línea) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105567
Willett, Chris y Morgan-Taylor, Martin. «Recognising the limits of transparency in EU consumer law», en: Devenney, James y Kenny, Mel (eds.) European Consumer Protection: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, p. 143-163.
WJP-World Justice Project. «WJP Rule of Law Index», (2023) (en línea) [Fecha de consulta: 30.06.2024] https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index
Xenidis, Raphaële, y Senden, Linda. «EU non-discrimination law in the era of artificial intelligence: Mapping the challenges of algorithmic discrimination», en: Bernitz, Ulf; Groussot, Xavier; Paju, Jaan y De Vries, Sybe A. (eds.) General principles of EU law and the EU digital order. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2020, p. 151-182.
Zalnieriute, Monika. «“Transparency Washing” in the Digital Age: A Corporate Agenda of Procedural Fetishism Special Issue: Transparency in the Digital Environment». Critical Analysis of Law: An International & Interdisciplinary Law Review, vol. 8, n.º 1 (2021), p. 139-153.
Zalnieriute, Monika; Moses, Lyria B. y Williams, George. «The Rule of Law and Automation of Government Decision-Making». The Modern Law Review, vol. 82, n.º 3 (2019), p. 425-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12412
