Métodos Mixtos para el Análisis de Redes Sociales

Article Sidebar

PDF (Castellano)

Main Article Content

Francisca Ortiz Ruiz
The Mitchell Centre for Social Network Analysis, The University of Manchester
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8538-4688

Las decisiones metodológicas que se toman a lo largo de cualquier investigación influyen en los resultados y sus conclusiones. Esto implica también que el enfoque desde donde se construye es relevante a la hora de discutir ideas que puedan tener repercusiones tanto en las políticas públicas, como en innovaciones de índole privada. La proliferación del uso de métodos mixtos ha ido en auge con los últimos años, pero no siempre se comprende lo mismo por ello, haciendo necesaria su reflexión. En este artículo se propone una definición de lo que son los “métodos mixtos” (MM), y los “métodos mixtos para análisis de redes sociales” (MMARS). Ambas definiciones se hacen a partir de la revisión de bibliografía sobre la temática.


Paraules clau
métodos mixtos, metodología, análisis de redes sociales, redes sociales, methods

Article Details

Com citar
Ortiz Ruiz, Francisca. «Métodos Mixtos para el Análisis de Redes Sociales». Redes: revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales, 2023, vol.VOL 34, núm. 1, p. 74-86, doi:10.5565/rev/redes.962.
Drets
Creative Commons License

Aquesta obra està sota una llicència internacional Creative Commons Reconeixement 4.0.

(c) Francisca Ortiz Ruiz, 2022

Biografia de l'autor/a

Francisca Ortiz Ruiz, The Mitchell Centre for Social Network Analysis, The University of Manchester

PhD candidate in Sociology, at The Mitchell Centre for Social Network Analysis, The University of Manchester. 
Referències

Bazeley, P. (2018). Integrating analyses in mixed method research. SAGE publications.

Bellotti, E. (2015). Qualitative networks. Mixed methods in sociological research. Routledge.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

Creamer, E. (2018). An Introduction to Fully Integrated Mixed Methods Research. Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. and Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage. First edition.

Creswell, J. and Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage. Second edition.

Crossley, N., Bellotti, E. Edwards, G. Everett, M. Koskinen, J. and Tranmer, M. (2015). Social Network Analysis for Ego-Nets. Sage Publications.

Froehlich, D., Rehm, M. and Rienties, B (2020). Mixed method social network analysis. Theories and methodologies in learning and education. Routledge.

Froehlich, D.; Mejeh, M.; Galey, S. and Schoonenboom, J. (2020). Integrating units of analysis. In Froehlich, D., Rehm, M. and Rienties, B., Mixed method social network analysis. Theories and methodologies in learning and education (pp. 38-48). Routledge.

Goertz, G. and Mahoney, J. (2012). A tale of two cultures. Qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences. Princeton University Press.

Greene, J. (2007). Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Hollstein, B. and Dominguez, S. (2014). Mixed-methods Social Network Research. Cambridge University Press.

Hollstein, B. (2014). Mixed methods Social Network Research. In B. Hollstein and Dominguez, S. (eds.) Mixed-methods Social Network Research. Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, R.B., Owuegbuzie, A.J. and Turner, L.A. (2007). Towards a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.

Läugler, M., Brouwer, J. and Gruber, H. (2020). Data collection for mixed method approaches in social network analysis. In Froehlich, D., Rehm, M. and Rienties, B., Mixed method social network analysis. Theories and methodologies in learning and education (pp. 25-37). Routledge.

Mertens, D. and Hesse-Biber, S. (2013). Mixed methods and credibility of evidence in evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 138, 5-13.

Morgan, D. (1998). Practical Strategies for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Applications to Health Research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 362-376.

Morgan, D. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76.

Niglas, K. (2010). The multidimensional model of research methodology: An integrated set of continua. In Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds.) Sage Handbook of mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Perry, B., Pescosolido, B. and Borgatti, S. (2018). Egocentric network analysis. Foundations, methods and models. Cambridge University Press.

Pescosolido, B., Olafsdottir, S., Sporns, O., Perry, B., Meslin, E., Grubesic, T., Martin, J., Koehly, L, Pridemore, W., Vespignani, A., Foroud, T. and Shekhar, A. (2017). The social Symbiome framework: linking genes-to-global cultures in public health using network science. In Neal, Z. (ed.) Handbook of applied systems science (pp. 25-48). Routledge.

Shannon-Baker, P. (2016). Making Paradigms Meaningful in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(4), 319-334.

Shannon-Baker, P. and Hilpert, J. (2020). Visual methods and representations in mixed methods (and) social network research: a discussion. In Froehlich, D., Rehm, M. and Rienties, B. (eds.) Mixed method social network analysis. Theories and methodologies in learning and education (pp. 49-57). Routledge.

Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 3–7.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. CA: Sage.

Watkins, D. and Gioia, D. (2015). Mixed methods research. Oxford University Press.

Weil, J. (2017). Research design in aging and social gerontology. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. Routledge.

Articles més llegits del mateix autor/a