A critique to modernity through the «useless character» of play. Sloterdijk’s metanoethical imperative and “ludic reason”
Article Sidebar
Google Scholar citations
Main Article Content
Xavier Gimeno Monfort
Francisco Javier Lopez Frías
In this article, we analyze Peter Sloterdijk’s concept of “metanoethical imperative” in You Must Change Your Life. Our goal is to shed light on what, by drawing on Bernard Suits, we call “ludic reason.” To do so, we will present and examine in depth the meaning of Sloterdijk’s metanoethical imperative, as well as the main features of his concept of “askesis.” Second, we will argue that both concepts are the result of the Heideggerian ontological principles underlying Sloterdijk’s moral philosophy. Third, we will provide a “Sloterdijkean” interpretation of Suits’ account of games by focusing on the metanoethical imperative that could be derived from the notion of the ludic reason. To conclude, we will focus on the role that the figure of the “Good-for-Nothing” plays in Sloterdijk’s account, showing connections between Suits’ and Sloterdijk’s approaches. We will argue that, in the philosophical approaches of both philosophers, the idea of game playing is closely tied to the “question on Being.”
Keywords
philosophy of games, sport, critical hermeneutics, ascetic
Article Details
How to Cite
Gimeno Monfort, Xavier; and Lopez Frías, Francisco Javier. “A critique to modernity through the «useless character» of play. Sloterdijk’s metanoethical imperative and ‘ludic reason’”. Recerca: revista de pensament i anàlisi, no. 23, pp. 219-38, https://raco.cat/index.php/RecercaPensamentAnalisi/article/view/343567.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Francisco Javier Lopez Frías, Habermas, modernidentity and human enhancement. Is the way forward? , Recerca: revista de pensament i anàlisi: No. 15 (2014): Bienes comunes: nuevas formas de participación de la sociedad civil en la democracia y la economía