Procesos participativos inclusivos para la restauración de ecosistemas urbanos en un contexto de emergencia climática

Article Sidebar

pdf (Castellano)

Main Article Content

Sara Maestre Andrés
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3971-5209
Nicolás Salmon
YES Innovation (Quito, Equador)
Grace Yépez
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador

La restauración de ecosistemas urbanos se está promoviendo cada vez más como solución basada en la naturaleza (SbN) para promover ciudades más resilientes frente al cambio climático, más habitables y socialmente inclusivas. Para evitar que las SbN reproduzcan exclusiones y desigualdades, es necesario tener en cuenta las diferentes dimensiones de la justicia socioambiental como principios clave de los procesos participativos inclusivos para el diseño, la implementación, el monitoreo y la evaluación de las SbN. Este artículo ilustra las variables principales de los procesos participativos en la investigación transdisciplinar y la toma de decisiones sobre SbN, es decir, el grado de poder en la toma de decisiones, la racionalidad del proceso y el grado de inclusión. Posteriormente, caracteriza lastres dimensiones de justicia socioambiental: la justicia distributiva, la procedimental y de reconocimiento. Finalmente, se explican las dimensiones relevantes a tener en cuenta a la hora de diseñar procesos participativos inclusivos sobre SbN que condicionan la justicia socioambiental como son (i) la desigualdad y el poder, (ii) la distribución desigual de la naturaleza urbana, iii)las diferencias culturales y sociales en la percepción, valoración y uso de la naturaleza urbana y iv) la interseccionalidad. Para cada dimensión, se plantean una serie de preguntas para reflexionar sobre el proceso, las recomendaciones, los indicadores de evaluación y la propuesta de métodos. Se concluye que es necesario promover procesos participativos inclusivos a lo largo del ciclo de planeamiento de las SbN urbanas para garantizar que estas se adapten a las necesidades y capacidades locales, generen resultados justos y equitativos, incorporen diferentes tipos de conocimiento y creen un sentido de orgullo y pertenencia entre las partes involucradas.

Paraules clau
soluciones basadas en la naturaleza, empoderamiento, justicia socioambiental, inclusividad, interseccionalidad

Article Details

Com citar
Maestre Andrés, Sara et al. “Procesos participativos inclusivos para la restauración de ecosistemas urbanos en un contexto de emergencia climática”. Papers: Regió Metropolitana de Barcelona: Territori, estratègies, planejament, no. 65, pp. 79-97, https://raco.cat/index.php/PapersIERMB/article/view/421362.
Referències
Andersson, E., Langemeyer, J., Borgström, S., McPhearson, T., Haase, D., Kronenberg, J. (2019). Enabling green and blue infrastructure to improve contributions to human well-being and equity in urban systems. BioScience 69(7), 566-574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz058

Anguelovski, I., Corbera, E. (2022). Integrating justice in Nature-Based Solutions to avoid nature-enabled dispossession. Ambio 52, 45–53.

Anguelovski, I., Brand, A.L., Connolly, J.J.T. et al. (2020). Expanding the Boundaries of Justice in Urban Greening Scholarship: Toward an Emancipatory, Antisubordination, Intersectional, and Relational Approach. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(6), 1743-1769, DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1740579.

Anguelovski, I., Connolly J., Brand A.L. (2018). From landscapes of utopia to the margins of the green urban life. For whom is the new green city? City 22(3), 417-436.

Arnstein, S.R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. AIP Journal 35, 216–224.

Barbosa, O., Tratalos, J.A., Armsworth P.R. et al. (2007). Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning 83, 187–195.

Baydala, L.T., Worrell, S., Fletcher F., Letendre, S., Letendre, L., Ruttan, L. (2013). Making a Place of Respect: Lessons Learned in Carrying Out Consent Protocol With First Nations Elders. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 7(2), 135-143

Byrne, J., (2012). When green is White: The cultural politics of race, nature and social exclusion in a Los Angeles urban national park. Geoforum 43, 595–611

Campbell-Page, R. M., Shaw-Ridley, M. (2013). Managing ethical dilemmas in community-based participatory research with vulnerable populations. Health promotion practice 14(4), 485-490.

Cho, S., Crenshaw, K.W., Mccall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38(4), 785–810.

Clarke, D., Murphy, C., Lorenzoni, I. (2018). Place attachment, disruption and transformative adaptation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 55, 81e89.

Cleary, A., Fielding, K. S., Murray, Z., Roiko, A. (2020). Predictors of nature connection among urban residents: Assessing the role of childhood and adult nature experiences. Environment and Behavior, 52(6), 579-610.

Cohen-Shacham, E., Walters, G., Janzen, C., Maginnis, S. (eds.) (2016). Nature-based Solutions to address global societal challenges. Gland, Suiza: IUCN.

Comisión Europea, DG de Investigación e Innovación (2015). Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities: Final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group ‘Nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities’.

Cousins J.J. (2021). Justice in nature-based solutions: Research and pathways. Ecological Economics 180, 106874

Danford, R.S., Cheng, C., Strohbach, M.W., Ryan, R., Nicolson, C., Warren, P.S. (2014). What does it take to achieve equitable urban tree canopy distribution? A Boston case study. Cities and the Environment 7(1), 1-20.

Figueroa-Arango, C. (2020). Guía para la integración de las Soluciones Basadas en la Naturaleza en la planificación urbana. Primera aproximación para Colombia. Berlín: Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung, Ecologic Institute, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt.

Fresque-Baxter, J., Armitage, D. (2012). Place identity and climate change adaptation: a synthesis and framework for understanding. WIREs Clim. Change 3(3), 251-266.

Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review 66, 66-75

Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. Nueva York: Basic Books.

Gould K., Lewis, T. (2016). Green Gentrification. Urban sustainability and the struggle for environmental justice. Londres: Routledge.

Gundersen, V., Skår, M., O’Brien, L., Wold, L.C., Follo, G.I. (2016). Children and nearby nature: A nationwide parental survey from Norway. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 17, 116-125.

Gustafson, D.L., Brunger, F. (2014). Ethics, “vulnerability,” and feminist Participatory Action Research with a disability community. Qualitative Health Research 24(7), 997-1005

Haase, D., Kabisch, S., Haase, A., Andersson, E., Banzhaf, E., Baró, F. (2017). Greening cities - To be socially inclusive? About the alleged paradox of society and ecology in cities. Habitat International 64, 41-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.005

Heynen, N. C., Lindsey, G. (2003). Correlates of urban forest canopy cover: implications for local public works. Public Works Management & Policy 8(1), 33-47.

Kaczynski, A.T., Potwarka, L. R. , Smale B. J. A., Mark, E. H. (2009). Association of Parkland Proximity with Neighborhood and Park-based Physical Activity: Variations by Gender and Age. Leisure Sciences 31(2), 174-191, DOI: 10.1080/01490400802686045

Kotsila, P., Anguelovski, I., Baró, F, Langemeyer, J., Sekulova, F., Connolly, J.J.T. (2021). Nature-based solutions as discursive tools and contested practices in urban nature’s neoliberalisation processes. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 4(2), 252-274.

Langemeyer, J., Connolly, J.J.T. (2020). Weaving notions of justice into urban ecosystem services research and practice. Environmental Science and Policy 109, 1-14.

Lara García, Á., Berraquero-Díaz, del Moral Ituarte, L. (2022). Contested spaces for negotiated urban resilience in Seville. En Ruiz-Mallén, I., March, H., Satorras, M. (eds.) In Urban Resilience to the climate emergency. Unravelling the transformative potential of institutional and grassroots initiatives. Suiza: Springer.

Maestre-Andrés, S., Calvet-Mir, L., Apostolopoulou, E. (2018). Unravelling stakeholder participation under conditions of neoliberal biodiversity governance in Catalonia, Spain. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36(7), 1299-1318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417753624

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003). Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Mobjörk, M. (2010). Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: a refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures 42, 866-873.

Morgan, M. F., Cuskelly, M., Moni, K. B. (2014). Unanticipated ethical issues in a participatory research project with individuals with intellectual disability. Disability & Society 29(8), 1305-1318.

Osborne, N. (2015). Intersectionality and kyriarchy: A framework for approaching power and social justice in planning and climate change adaptation. Planning Theory 14(2), 130-151.

Parr, H. (2007). Mental health, nature work, and social inclusion. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25(3), 537-561.

Restall, B., Conrad, E. (2015). A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 159, 264-278.

Ryan, R. L., Buxton, J. (2015). Applying RPM to urban greening projects: Insights from the inner city. Fostering reasonableness: Supportive environments for bringing out our best. Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing (Maize Books), 176-193.

Sang, Å. O., Knez, I., Gunnarsson, B., Hedblom, M. (2016). The effects of naturalness, gender, and age on how urban green space is perceived and used. Urban forestry & urban greening 18, 268- 276

Seeland, K., Nicolè, S. (2006). Public green space and disabled users. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 5(1), 29-34.

Toxopeus, H., Kotsila, P., Conde, M., Katona, A., Van der Jagt, A. P., Polzin, F. (2020). How ‘just’ is hybrid governance of urban nature-based solutions? Cities 105, 102839.

Waitt, G., Knobel, H. (2018). Embodied geographies of liveability and urban parks. Urban Studies 55(14), 3151-3167.

Weber M. (1919). La política como vocación.

Wesselink, A., Paavola, J., Fritsch, O. et al. (2011). Rationales for public participation in environmental policy and governance: Practitioners’ perspectives. Environment and Planning A 43, 2688–2704.

Williams, R., Vogelsong, H., Green, G. y Cordell, K. (2004). Outdoor recreation participation of people with mobility disabilities: Selected results of the National Survey of Recreation and the Environment. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 22(2), 84-100.