Making urban ecosystem mapping accessible to the public the Urban Nature Atlas of Oslo (Norway)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and maps have typically been used for technical support purposes within various agencies and for model and methodology development by researchers. Maps have been identified as a valuable tool to provide knowledge and skills to various user groups. Through ecosystem service assessment and accounting of urban nature, researchers and municipal staff have generated a number of GIS datasets and maps on urban ecosystem extent, condition and selected ecosystem services in Norway. In this study, we discuss how the City of Oslo could report on trends in the extent and condition of urban nature and ecosystem services flows. Ecosystem accounting at national level is often focused on reporting in aggregate tabular format. We argue that this aggregate reporting is not conducive to promoting public awareness and engagement at local level. However, Oslo’s urban ecosystem map layers used for assessment and accounting have not been designed with only public access and awareness-raising in mind. The Urban Nature Atlas could bridge several application results (e.g. public and official) in a more accurate coverage of the complexity in valuation. In this study, we give an overview of the Urban Nature Atlas of Oslo and discuss the purposes such an atlas could have in the future (e.g. supporting local interests in public hearings). Finally, we discuss public expectations of accuracy and reliability of maps and potential barriers to public use.
Article Details
Bekessy, S.A. , M.C. Runge, A.M. Kusmanoff, D.A. Keith & B.A. Wintle (2018) Ask not what nature can do for you: A critique of ecosystem services as a communication strategy. Biological Conservation 224, 71-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.05.017
Broekx S., I. Liekens, W. Peelaerts, L. De Nocker, D. Landuyt, J. Staes, P. Meire, M. Schaafsma, W. Van Reeth, O. Van den Kerckhove & T. Cerulus (2013) A web application to support the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 40: 65-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.003
Burkhard, B. & J. Maes (Eds.) (2017) Mapping Ecosystem Services. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, 374 pp.
Chan, K. M. A. & T. Satterfield (2020) The maturation of ecosystem services: Social and policy research expands, but whither biophysically informed valuation? People and Nature. 2020;00:1–40. DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10137
European Environmental Agency (2020) Urban Atlas. https://land.copernicus.eu/local/urban-atlas
Fagerholm, N. & I. Palomo (2017) 5.6.2. Participatory GIS approaches for mapping ecosystem services. In: Burkhard, B. & J. Maes (Eds.) (2017) Mapping Ecosystem Services. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, 216-222.
Filatova, T., P.H. Verburg, D. C. Parker & C. A. Stannard (2013) Spatial agent-based models for socio-ecological systems: Challenges and prospects. Environmental Modelling & Software 45 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.003
Gómez-Baggethun, E. & D. N. Barton (2013) Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecological Economics 86 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019
Jacobs, S. & B. Burkhard (2017) 4.6. Applying expert knowledge for ecosystem services quantification. In: Burkhard, B. & J. Maes (Eds.) (2017) Mapping Ecosystem Services. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, 144-148.
Klein, T. M., E. Celio & A. Grêt-Regamey (2014) Ecosystem services visualization and communication: A demand analysis approach for designing information and conceptualizing decision support systems. Ecosystem Services 13, 173-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.006
Kranz, R. (2000) Crossing the Moat: Using Ecosystem Services to Communicate Ecological Ideas beyond the Ivory Tower. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 81 (1) 95-97. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20168399
Maes, J., G. Zulian, M. Thijssen, C. Castell, F. Baró, A.M. Ferreira, J. Melo, C.P. Garrett, N. David, C. Alzetta, D. Geneletti, C. Cortinovis, I. Zwierzchowska, F. Louro Alves, C. Souto Cruz, C. Blasi, M.M. Alós Ortí, F. Attorre, M.M. Azzella, G. Capotorti, R. Copiz, L. Fusaro, F. Manes, F. Marando, M. Marchetti, B. Mollo, E. Salvatori, L. Zavattero, P.C. Zingari, M.C. Giarratano, E.
Bianchi, E. Duprè, D. Barton, E. Stange, M. Perez-Soba, M. van Eupen, P. Verweij, A. de Vries, H. Kruse, C. Polce, M. Cugny-Seguin, M. Erhard, R. Nicolau, A. Fonseca, M Fritz & A. Teller (2016) Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. Urban Ecosystems. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Miljødirektoratet (2020a) Miljøstatus. https://miljostatus.miljodirektoratet.no/kart
Miljødirektoratet (2020b) Naturbase. https://kart.naturbase.no/
Miljødirektoratet (2020c) Nature Index for Norway. https://www.naturindeks.no/
MIT Senseable City Lab (2020) Exploring the Green Canopy in cities around the world. http://senseable.mit.edu/treepedia/cities/oslo
Oslo Kommune (2020a) Statistikk. https://www.oslo.kommune.no/statistikk/
Oslo Kommune (2020b) Miljø- og klimastatus. https://www.oslo.kommune.no/statistikk/miljo-ogklimastatus/#gref
Oslo Kommune (2020c) Tur og friluftsliv. https://www.oslo.kommune.no/natur-kultur-og-fritid/tur-ogfriluftsliv/#gref
Oslo Kommune Plan- og bygningsetaten (2018) Fagrapport Grøntregnskap: en måling av grønnstruktur i Oslos byggesone.
https://www.oslo.kommune.no/getfile.php/13300369-1539862391/Tjenester%20og%20tilbud/Politikk%20og%20administrasjon/Etater%2C%20foretak%20og%20ombud/Plan-%20og%20bygningsetaten/Grøntregnskap%20-%20fagrapport.pdf
Pascual, U., P. Balvanera, S. Díaz, G. Pataki, E. Roth, M. Stenseke, R.T. Watson, E. Bas¸ak Dessane, M. Islar, E. Kelemen, V. Maris, M. Quaas, S.M. Subramanian, H. Wittmer, A. Adlan, S. Ahn, Y.S. Al-Hafedh, E. Amankwah, S.T. Asah, P. Berry, A. Bilgin, S.J. Breslow, C. Bullock, D. Cáceres, H. Daly-Hassen, E. Figueroa, C.D. Golden, E. Gómez-Baggethun, D.González-Jiménez, J. Houdet, H. Keune, R. Kumar, K. Ma, P.H. May, A. Mead, P. O’Farrell, R. Pandit, W. Pengue, R. Pichis-Madruga, F. Popa, S. Preston, D. Pacheco-Balanza, H. Saarikoski, B.B. Strassburg, M. van den Belt, M. Verma, F. Wickson & N. Yagi (2017) Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27: 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006
Raymond, C. M., B. A. Bryan, D. H. MacDonald, A. Cast, S. Strathearn, A. Grandgirard & T. Kalivas (2009) Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 68, 1301- 1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.006
Santos-Martín, F., E. Kelemen, M. García-Llorente, S. Jacobs, E. Oteros-Rozas, D. N. Barton, I. Palomo, V. Hevia & B. Martín-López (2017) 4.2. Socio-cultural valuation approaches. In: Burkhard, B. & J. Maes (Eds.) (2017) Mapping Ecosystem Services. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, 104-114.
Schröter, M., E. Crouzat, L. Hölting, J. Massenberg, J. Rode, M. Hanisch, N. Kabisch, J. Palliwoda, J. A. Priess, R. Seppelt & M. Beckmann (2020) Assumptions in ecosystem service assessments: Increasing transparency for conservation. Ambio (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01379-9
Stange, E., G. Zulian, G. Rusch, D. Barton & M. Nowell (2017) Ecosystem services mapping for municipal policy: ESTIMAP and zoning for urban beekeeping. One Ecosystem 2: e14014. https://doi.org/10.3897/ oneeco.2.e14014
Suárez, M., D. N. Barton, Z. Cimburova, G. M. Rusch, E. Gómez-Baggethun, M. Onaindia (2020) Environmental justice and outdoor recreation opportunities: A spatially explicit assessment in Oslo metropolitan area, Norway. Environmental Science and Policy 108, 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.014
Sælthun, N.R, D.N. Barton & Z.S. Venter (2020) REO: Estimering av overflateavrenning fra urbane felt. Beregningsgrunnlag for et arealdifferensiert overvannsgebyr. NINA Rapport 1851. Norsk institutt for naturforskning.
Thompson, J. L., Al. Kaiser, E. L. Sparks, M. Shelton, E. Brunden, J. A. Cherry, Just Cebrian (2016) Ecosystem – What? Public Understanding and Trust in conservation science and ecosystem services. Frontiers in Communication 1:3. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2016.00003
US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2020) EnviroAtlas Interactive Map. https://www.epa.gov/enviroatlas/enviroatlas-interactive-map
Venter, Z. S., N. Hjertager Krog & D. N. Barton (2020) Linking green infrastructure to urban heat and human health risk mitigation in Oslo, Norway. Science of The Total Environment 709, 136193 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136193
Vorstius, A. C., & C. J. Spray (2015) A comparison of ecosystem services mapping tools for their potential to support planning and decision-making on a local scale. Ecosystem Services 15 75-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.07.007
Zafra-Calvo, N, P. Balvanera, U. Pascual, J. Merçon, B. Martín-López, M. van Noordwijk, T. Heita Mwampamba, S. Lele, C. Ifejika Speranza, P. Arias-Arévalo, D. Cabrol, D. M. Cáceres, P. O’Farrell, S. Mazhenchery Subramanian, S. Devy, S. Krishnan, R. Carmenta, L. Guibrunet, Y. Kraus-Elsin, H. Moersberger, J. Cariño & S. Díaz (2020) Plural valuation of nature for equity and sustainability: Insights from the Global South.Global Environmental Change 63, 102115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102115
Zhao, C. & H.A. Sander (2018) Assessing the sensitivity of urban ecosystem service maps to input spatial data resolution and method choice. Landscape and Urban Planning 175: 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.007
Zulian, G., I. Liekens, S. Broekx, N. Kabisch, L. Kopperoinen & D. Geneletti (2017) 7.3.1. Mapping urban ecosystem services. In: Burkhard, B. & J. Maes (Eds.) (2017) Mapping Ecosystem Services. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, 312-318.