El vínculo substancial leibniziano como universal antropológico. A través de Carnap, Anderson-Bernalp, y Miguel Sánchez Mazas

Carnap’s logical positivism misunderstood Leibniz’s notion of substantial bond, as if this type of correlations could be justified from infinitist logical assumption. However, after 1970, an anthropological Copernican twist of a finitist type in the formalization of Leibniz’s bones was produced, giving rise to more specialized, fragmented and casuistic, logical formalism, as in the proposals of Anderson-Bernalp and Sánchez-Mazas.