How expensive is it to build a visitable home? A case report
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Loneliness and social isolation of older people or those with mobility impairments may result from the physical environment not being in correspondence to their degree of mobility. Winter conditions combined with the presence of steps at the entrance to homes are among the obstacles that prevent them from participating in social or community activities necessary for their well-being. The concept of visitability is proposed in order to allow seniors or individuals with mobility impairments to visit their loved ones. The three criteria for achieving the basic visitability of a residence are: 1) an entrance without a step at the front, back or side of the home (located on a path accessible from the street); 2) wide doors on the main floor (minimum 813 mm (32") opening); and 3) an adapted bathroom on the main floor. The objective of this study is to validate whether visitability can be an economically viable solution, through a comparative cost analysis, to enable older people or people with mobility impairments to visit their loved ones. The results of this case study demonstrate that the marginal costs of applying visitability criteria to new construction can be zero or negligible. These results indicate that the approach to visitability, both basic visitability and so-called improved visitability, should be taken into account more systematically by builders and developers in order to promote the social participation of older people or those with motor disabilities.
Article Details

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
(c) 2023
Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a
- Marie-Claire Bernatchez, Christèle Poirier, Ernesto Morales, Désirée Maltais, Rethinking the bathroom for adolescents with Cerebral Palsy: an exploratory pilot study addressing privacy and independence , Journal of accessibility and design for all: 2017: Vol.: 7 Núm.: 2
- Ernesto Morales, Stephanie Gamache, Geoffrey Edwards, Winter: public enemy #1 for accessibility exploring new solutions , Journal of accessibility and design for all: 2014: Vol.: 4 Núm.: 1
- Stephanie Gamache, Ernesto Morales, Luc Noreau, Israël Dumont, Jean Leblond, Measure of environmental accessibility (MEA): development and inter-rater reliability , Journal of accessibility and design for all: 2018: Vol.: 8 Núm.: 1
- William Thériault, Ernesto Morales, Accessibility and social participation in urban settings for people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or an intellectual disability (ID) , Journal of accessibility and design for all: Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2022)
- Stéphanie Gamache, Francois Routhier, Ernesto Morales, Marie-Hélène Vandersmissen, Jean Leblond, Normand Boucher, Bradford James McFadyen, Luc Noreau, Municipal practices and needs regarding accessibility of pedesrian infrastructures for indivduals with physical disabilities in Québec, Canada , Journal of accessibility and design for all: 2017: Vol.: 7 Núm.: 1
- Stephanie Gamache, Francois Routhier, W. Ben Mortenson, William C. Miller, Kathleen A. Martin Ginis, Objective evaluation of architectural obstacles encountered in two Canadian urban settings by mobility device users , Journal of accessibility and design for all: Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2020)
- Alicia Ruiz Rodrigo, Ernesto Morales, Cindy Louis Delsoin, Jacqueline Rousseau, Parents' perceptions of the impact of the home environment on youth living with an Autism Spectrum Disorder , Journal of accessibility and design for all: Vol. 13, Núm. 1 (2023)