Comprehension vs. production of oblique relatives by Italian-speaking typically developing individuals, from primary school to adulthood

Main Article Content

Francesca Volpato
Elisa Piccoli

This paper discusses both the comprehension and the production of oblique, pied-piping relative clauses from primary school age to adulthood. Relative clauses that are not produced before 10 years (Guasti & Cardinaletti 2003) are however comprehended in high percentages and above chance since primary school age. Production appears to be related to the educational level and experience with the formal register, as shown here by the comparison of different groups of students and adults. Unlike what happens with object relatives (Adani et al. 2010, 2014; Volpato 2010, 2019), number mismatch does not facilitate the comprehension of oblique relatives, nor their production.

Keywords
oblique relatives, comprehension, production, Italian, Pied-piping, formal register

Article Details

How to Cite
Volpato, Francesca et al. “Comprehension vs. production of oblique relatives by Italian-speaking typically developing individuals, from primary school to adulthood ”. Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics, 2025, vol.VOL 11, no. 7, pp. 1-19, doi:10.5565/rev/isogloss.589.
References

Adani, Flavia (2011). Rethinking the acquisition of relative clauses in Italian: towards a grammatically based account. Journal of Child Language 38, 141-165.

Adani, Flavia, Van der Lely, Heather K.J., Forgiarini, Matteo & Guasti, Maria Teresa (2010). Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian children. Lingua 120, 2148-2166.

Adani, Flavia, Forgiarini, Matteo, Guasti, Maria Teresa., & Van der Lely, Heather K. J. (2014). Number dissimilarities facilitate the comprehension of relative clauses in children with (Grammatical) Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Child Language 41, 811-841.

Belletti, Adriana & Contemori, Carla. 2010. Intervention and attraction. On the production of subject and object relatives by Italian (young) children and adults. In A. Castro, J. Costa, M. Lobo, & F. Pratas (eds.), Language Acquisition and Development. Proceedings of GALA 2009, Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press, 39-52.

Bianchi, Valentina. 1999. Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

Cardinaletti, Anna. 1998. On the deficient/strong opposition in possessive systems. In A. Alexiadou & Ch. Wilder (eds), Possessors, Predicates, and Movement in the Determiner Phrase, 17-53. Amsterdam, Benjamins.

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1982. On the theory of relative clauses and markedness. The Linguistic Review 1, 247-294.

Contemori, Carla & Belletti, Adriana. 2014. Relatives and passive object relatives in Italian-speaking children and adults: intervention in production and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics 35(6): 1021-1053.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000689

Costa, João, Friedmann, Naama, Silva, Carolina, & Yachini, Maya. 2014. The boy that the chef cooked: Acquisition of PP relatives in European Portuguese and Hebrew. Lingua 150, 386-409.

Costa, João, Friedmann, Naama, Silva, Carolina, & Yachini, Maya. 2015. The acquisition of PP relatives in Hebrew and European Portuguese: another window into the atoms of intervention. In C. Hamann, E. Ruigendijk (eds), Language Acquisition and Development. Proceedings of GALA 2013. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 35-47.

Friedman, Naama, Belletti, Adriana, Rizzi, Luigi. 2009. Relativized relatives: types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119, 67–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.002

Guasti, Maria Teresa & Cardinaletti, Anna. 2003. Relative clause formation in Romance child’s production. Probus 15, 47-89.

Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Labelle, Marie. 1990. Predication, WH-movement and the development of relative clauses. Language Acquisition 1, 95-119.

Marconi, Lucia, Ott, Michela, Pesenti Elia, Ratti, Daniela, & Tavella, Mauro. 1994. Lessico elementare. Dati statistici sull’italiano letto e scritto dai bambini delle elementari. Bologna: Zanichelli.

McDaniel, Dana, McKee, Cecile & Bernstein, Judy B. 1998. How Children's Relatives Solve a Problem for Minimalism. Language 74.2, 308-334.

Piccoli, Elisa. 2018. Ripetizione e produzione elicitata di frasi complesse in studenti adolescenti con DSA e bilingui. Un protocollo di insegnamento esplicito. MA Thesis, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.

Piccoli, Elisa. 2024. Le frasi relative oblique in italiano. Produzione e comprensione dall'età scolare all'età adulta e uno studio di priming sintattico. PhD Dissertation, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.

Piccoli, Elisa, Cardinaletti, Anna, Volpato, Francesca. 2023. L’elicitazione orale di frasi relative oblique: strategie di risposta e implicazioni per la didattica. In F. Gallina, Y. Martari (eds.), Didattica delle lingue e valutazione: tra società, scuola e università. Pisa: Pisa University Press, 149-162.

R Core Team (2024). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <https://www.R-project.org/>.

Varlokosta, Spyridoula. 1997. The acquisition of relative clauses in Modern Greek: evidence for movement. In A. Sorace, C. Heycock, & R. Shillcock (eds.), Proceedings of the GALA ‘97 Conference on Language Acquisition. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, 184-187.

Volpato, Francesca. 2010. The acquisition of relative clauses and phi-features: Evidence from hearing and hearing impaired populations. PhD Dissertation, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.

Volpato, Francesca. 2019. Relative clauses, phi features, and memory skills: Evidence from Populations with Normal Hearing and Hearing Impairment. Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari.

Volpato, Francesca. 2022. On the production of restrictive pied-piping relative clauses in Italian: Evidence from populations with typical and atypical language development. In M. Bril, M. Coene, T. Ihsane, P. Sleeman, & T. Westveer (eds.), Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics 8(5)/16, 1-25.