La implicació de ChatGPT en l'educació i els serveis jurídics: una revisió sistemàtica de la literatura
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Aquesta revisió sistemàtica de la literatura explora les implicacions de les eines d'intel·ligència artificial (IA) en l'educació i els serveis jurídics, com ara ChatGPT, destacant el seu potencial transformador i els reptes associats. Investiga la integració de ChatGPT dins de la pedagogia i la pràctica jurídica, emfatitzant la seva capacitat per millorar les metodologies d'ensenyament, agilitzar els processos legals i democratitzar l'accés a la informació jurídica. La literatura es va recollir de tres bases de dades principals, Scopus, Science Direct i Web of Science, a través de les directrius PRISMA. D'un registre total de (n=126), es van finalitzar n=21 registres per a la seva inclusió per procedir amb l'anàlisi per buscar les respostes a les possibles preguntes de recerca. Sintetitzant el treball acadèmic existent, la revisió identifica les tendències clau, el consens i les llacunes en l'aplicació de la IA en entorns jurídics. Les troballes indiquen que ChatGPT remodela l'educació jurídica fomentant experiències d'aprenentatge interactives i personalitzades, alhora que planteja preocupacions sobre la dependència excessiva de la IA i la necessitat d'ajustos pedagògics. Les capacitats de ChatGPT en el resum, la redacció i la recerca de documents demostren la seva utilitat en la pràctica jurídica, tot i que les consideracions ètiques com la privadesa de les dades i el biaix algorítmic continuen sent importants. L'estudi emfatitza la importància d'integrar l'alfabetització en IA als currículums jurídics i d'implementar directrius ètiques sòlides per maximitzar els beneficis de ChatGPT i, alhora, mitigar els riscos potencials. En definitiva, aquesta revisió proporciona una comprensió completa de l'impacte de ChatGPT en l'educació i els serveis jurídics, oferint informació valuosa per a educadors, professionals i responsables polítics a l'hora de navegar pel panorama tecnològic en evolució.
Article Details
Aquesta obra està sota una llicència internacional Creative Commons Reconeixement 4.0.
(c) Mohsin Dhali et al, 2026
Drets d'autor
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
Texts will be published under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, provided they include an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship, its initial publication in this journal and the terms of the license.
Mohsin Dhali, Prince Sultan University
Investigador (Facultat de Dret)
Universitat Príncep Sultan, Riad, Aràbia Saudita
Muhammad Imran, Prince Sultan University
Investigador al Laboratori de Recerca Educativa de la Facultat d'Humanitats i Ciències de la Universitat Prince Sultan, Aràbia Saudita; investigador de l'Institut Científic Europeu (ESI) a la Universitat de Saint Joseph, Macau; i professor adjunt al Departament de Llengua i Literatura Angleses de la Universitat Khazar, Azerbaidjan
Norah Mansour Almusharraf, Prince Sultan University
Professor associat a la Universitat Prince Sultan (PSU), Aràbia Saudita, i líder acadèmic i executiu sènior especialitzat en governança institucional, garantia de qualitat, transformació digital i desenvolupament estratègic.
Shafiqul Hassan, Prince Sultan University
Universitat Príncep Sultan, Riad, Aràbia Saudita.
Ajevski, M., Barker, K., Gilbert, A., Hardie, L., & Ryan, F. (2023). ChatGPT and the future of legal education and practice. The Law Teacher, 57(3), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2023.2207426
Akiba, D., & Fraboni, M. C. (2023). AI-Supported Academic Advising: Exploring ChatGPT’s Current State and Future Potential toward Student Empowerment. Education Sciences 2023, Vol. 13, Page 885, 13(9), 885. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI13090885
Alkaissi, H., & McFarlane, S. I. (2023). Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35179
Azamfirei, R., Kudchadkar, S. R., & Fackler, J. (2023). Large Language Models and the Perils of their Hallucinations. Critical Care (London, England), 27(1), 120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04393-x
Bell, F., & Legg, M. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the legal profession: Becoming the AI-enhanced lawyer. University of Tasmania Law Review, 38(2), 34–59. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/agispt.20210826052346
Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. Technology in Society, 75, 102370. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2023.102370
Blair-Stanek, A., Holzenberger, N., & Van Durme, B. (2023). Can GPT-3 Perform Statutory Reasoning? 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3594536.3595163
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Callister, P. D. (2020). Law, Artificial Intelligence, and Natural Language Processing: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to My Search
Results. Law Library Journal, p. 112. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/llj112&id=163&div=25&collection=journals
Carrel, A. (2018). Legal Intelligence through Artificial Intelligence Requires Emotional Intelligence: A New Competency Model for the 21st Century Legal Professional. Georgia State University Law Review, 35. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/gslr35&id=1213&div=55&collection=journals
Carrel, A. (2019). Legal Intelligence Through Artificial Intelligence Requires Emotional Intelligence: A New Competency Model for the 21st Century Legal Professional. GA. ST. U. L. Rev, 35. https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulrAvailableat:https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr/vol35/iss4/4
Choi, J., Hickman, K., Monahan, A., & Schwarcz, D. (2022). ChatGPT Goes to Law School. Journal of Legal Education, 71(3). https://jle.aals.org/home/vol71/iss3/2
Cotton, D., Cotton, P., Education, J. S.-I. in, & 2023, undefined. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Taylor & FrancisDRE Cotton, PA Cotton, JR ShipwayInnovations in Education and Teaching International, 2023•Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Dianova, V. G., & Schultz, M. D. (2023). Discussing ChatGPT’s implications for industry and higher education: The case for transdisciplinarity and digital humanities. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/09504222231199989. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222231199989
Drake, A. M. (2016). The Need for Experiential Legal Research Education *. LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL, 108(4), 511. https://www.lexis
Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2023). GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models. http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10130
Farazouli, A., Cerratto-Pargman, T., Bolander-Laksov, K., & McGrath, C. (2023). Hello GPT! Goodbye home examination? An exploratory study of AI chatbots impact on university teachers’ assessment practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2241676
Friesen, E. (2022). The Artificial Researcher: Information Literacy and AI in the Legal Research Classroom. Legal Writing: The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute, 26(2), 241–251. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jlwriins26&id=247&div=17&collection=journals
Goltz, N. (Sean), & Dondoli, G. (2019). A note on science, legal research and artificial intelligence. Information & Communications Technology Law, 28(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2019.1644065
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications.
Guleria, A., Krishan, K., Sharma, V., & Kanchan, T. (2023). ChatGPT: Forensic, legal, and ethical issues. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/00258024231191829. https://doi.org/10.1177/00258024231191829
Haight, I. M. (2019). Digital Natives, Techno-Transplants: Framing Minimum Technology Standards for Law School Graduates. Journal of the Legal Profession, 44. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jlegpro44&id=195&div=15&collection=journals
Hamilton, S. (2023). Blind Judgement: Agent-Based Supreme Court Modelling With GPT. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.05327v1
Hargreaves, S. (2023). ‘Words are Flowing Out Like Endless Rain Into a Paper Cup’: ChatGPT & Law School Assessments. Legal
Education Review, 33(1), 69–105. https://doi.org/10.53300/001C.83297
Hutson, M. (2022). Could AI help you to write your next paper? Nature, 611(7934), 192–193. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03479-w
Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2024). Digital Learning Demand and Applicability of Quality 4.0 for Future Education: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 14(4).
Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep464.
Janatian, S., Westermann, H., Tan, J., Savelka, J., & Benyekhlef, K. (2023). From Text to Structure: Using Large Language Models to Support the Development of Legal Expert Systems. http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04911
Janoski-Haehlen, E., & Starnes, S. (2020). The Ghost in the Machine: Artificial Intelligence in Law Schools. Duquesne Law Review, 58(1). https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol58/iss1/3
Katz, D. M., Bommarito, M. J., Gao, S., & Arredondo, P. (2023). GPT-4 Passes the Bar Exam. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.4389233
Khurana, D., Koli, A., Khatter, K., & Singh, S. (2023). Natural language processing: state of the art, current trends and challenges. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(3), 3713–3744. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11042-022-13428-4/FIGURES/3
Kiršienė, J., Amilevičius, D., & Stankevičiūtė, D. (2022). Digital Transformation of Legal Services and Access to Justice: Challenges and Possibilities. Baltic Journal of Law and Politics, 15(1), 141–172. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2022-0007
Koos, S., & Wachsmann, S. (2023). Navigating the Impact of ChatGPT/GPT4 on Legal Academic Examinations: Challenges, Opportunities and Recommendations. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v6i2.45270
Liévin, V., Hother, C. E., & Winther, O. (2022). Can large language models reason about medical questions? http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.08143
Malhotra, I. (2023). Influence of Technology and Artificial Intelligence Impacting the Growth of Legal Industry. Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research, 5 Issue 2. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/injlolw11&id=4165&div=376&collection=journals
Medianik, K. (2017). Artificially Intelligent Lawyers: Updating the Model Rules of Professional Conduct in Accordance with the New Technological Era. Cardozo Law Review, 39. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/cdozo39&id=1565&div=52&collection=journals
Murray, K. (2021). Take Note: Teaching Law Students to be Responsible Stewards of Technology. Catholic University Law Review, 70(2). https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol70/iss2/7
Naumova, E. N. (2023). A mistake-find exercise: a teacher’s tool to engage with information innovations, ChatGPT, and their analogs. Journal of Public Health Policy, 44(2), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-023-00400-1
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International journal of qualitative methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.
O’leary, D. L. (2021). “Smart” Lawyering: Integrating Technology Competence into the Legal Practice Curriculum. U.N.H.L. Rev, 19. https://scholars.unh.edu/unh_lr/vol19/iss2/2
Oltz, T. P. (2022). Educating Robot-Proof Attorneys. North Dakota Law Review, 97. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nordak97&id=195&div=14&collection=journals
Oltz, T. P. (2023). ChatGPT, Professor of Law. University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 2023(1), 207–221.
Osborne, C. L. (2016). The State of Legal Research Education: A Survey of First-Year Legal Research Programs, or "Why Johnny and Jane
Cannot Research. LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL, 108(3), 403. https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlufac
Perkins, M. (2023). Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
Rajendra, J. B., & Thuraisingam, A. S. (2022). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ITS IMPACT ON THE LEGAL FRATERNITY. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 13(2), 129–161. https://doi.org/10.32890/UUMJLS2022.13.2.6
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., Teaching, S. T.-J. of A. L. and, & 2023, undefined. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journals.Sfu.CaJ Rudolph, S Tan, S TanJournal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 2023•journals.Sfu.Ca, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Savelka, J. (2023). Unlocking Practical Applications in Legal Domain: Evaluation of GPT for Zero-Shot Semantic Annotation of Legal Texts. Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2023), June 19â•fi23, 2023, Braga, Portugal, 1, 447–451. https://doi.org/10.1145/3594536.3595161
Sharma, A. (2022). The Escalation of ChatGPT: How ChatGPT Will Exert Influence on the Legal Profession? Jus Corpus Law Journal, 3. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/juscrp3&id=5069&div=491&collection=journals
Shi, C., Sourdin, T., & Li, B. (2021). The Smart Court – A New Pathway to Justice in China? International Journal for Court Administration, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.367
Simshaw, D. (2023). Toward National Regulation Of Legal Technology: A Path Forward For Access To Justice. Fordham Law Review, 92(1). https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol92/iss1/1
Smith, M. (2023). Language Models, Plagiarism, and Legal Writing. University of New Hampshire Law Review, 222. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4542723
Tan, J., Westermann, H., … K. B. A. to J. (AI4AJ 2023, & 2023, undefined. (2023). ChatGPT as an Artificial Lawyer? Ceur-Ws.OrgJ Tan, H Westermann, K BenyekhlefArtificial Intelligence for Access to Justice (AI4AJ 2023), 2023•ceur-Ws.Org. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3435/short2.pdf
Tarves, T. K. (2023). Technology Competence Instruction and Assessment under the Principles and Standards of Legal Research Competency. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 42(2), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/0270319X.2023.2216130
Vidal, D. E., Loufek, B., Kim, Y.-H., & Vidal, N. Y. (2023). Navigating US Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine—A Primer for Physicians. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health, 1(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MCPDIG.2023.01.003
Westermann, H., Meeùs, S., Godet, M., Troussel, A., Tan, J., Savelka, J., & Benyekhlef, K. (2023, June 23). Bridging the Gap: Mapping Layperson Narratives to Legal Issues with Language Models. Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Automated Semantic Analysis of Information in Legal Text (ASAIL)). https://www.
Wild, B. (2023, April 9). ChatGPT: Cardiff students admit using AI on essays. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-65167321
Yu, F., Quartey, L., & Schilder, F. (2022). Legal Prompting: Teaching a Language Model to Think Like a Lawyer. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.01326v2
Yu, R., & Alì, G. S. (2019). What’s Inside the Black Box? AI Challenges for Lawyers and Researchers. Legal Information Management, 19(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1472669619000021
Yu, Y. (2023). Discussion on the Reform of Higher Legal Education in China Based on the Application and Limitation of Artificial Intelligence in Law Represented by ChatGPT. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 14. http://drpress.org/ojs/index.php/EHSS/article/view/8840